Simulation and educationPerformance and skill retention of intubation by paramedics using seven different airway devices—A manikin study☆
Introduction
In emergency situations like cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), ventilation and oxygenation of patients is a potentially lifesaving procedure.1, 2, 3 Main indications for immediate airway interventions are severe trauma, cardiac arrest and other causes of coma.4 In this context, endotracheal intubation (ETI) is perceived as the optimal method for providing and maintaining a patent and secure airway.5, 6, 7 However, ETI may lead to prolonged interruptions of CPR and in some cases laryngoscopy and intubation may prove impossible or cause a life threatening deterioration in the patient's condition.8, 9 In contrast, use of supraglottic airway devices may help to reduce time to ventilation, especially in patients with a difficult airway.10, 11, 12
ETI requires highly skilled and experienced personnel, who receive regular training and practice.13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 Especially in prehospital emergency situations, it is mandatory to secure the airway as safely and quickly as possible. Persistent and prolonged attempts at intubation may cause catastrophic respiratory events.19
Difficulties with ETI as well as airway-associated adverse outcomes led to the concept of “difficult airway management”, where supraglottic airway devices provided valuable alternatives.20, 21, 22 Supraglottic airway devices are less invasive and technically easier to use than ETI.7
In Europe, prehospital ETI is performed by physicians and paramedics. However, endotracheal intubations by paramedics are performed infrequently.18
In consequence, we performed this manikin study in order to evaluate time to ventilation, usability and skill retention of alternate supraglottic airway devices in comparison to ETI. This evaluation was repeated after 3 months. Our aim was to assess the performance of paramedics with respect to success rate and time of insertion of the alternate airway devices as compared to ETI.
Section snippets
Methods
Following approval by ethical committee of the Medical University Vienna, 41 active voluntary paramedics of the Red Cross Vorarlberg, Austria, participated after informed consent. All of them had already completed their training within the past 5 years. In Austria, training schedules for paramedics differ from other curricula, such as in Germany or the U.S.A.: basic airway management is limited to bag-valve ventilation and advanced airway management, which includes intubation, requires further
Results
This study was conducted between September 2009 and January 2010. Forty-one paramedics (8 female and 33 male, age 30 ± 13) participated in this study.
Discussion
Following a single training session, the 41 paramedics recruited for our study were more successful at performed intubations with five out of six supraglottic airway devices than with ETI.
Up until now, no study has compared the application of widely used supraglottic airway devices with ETI by paramedics. Studies have investigated various airway devices in different settings and in different populations, with varying results of success rates. Differences appear to correlate strongly with the
Conclusion
Within the limitations of this manikin setting, it might be suggested that in emergency situations safe and effective alternatives to ETI are available. ETI should preferably only be performed by trained and experienced paramedics or physicians. In inexperienced hands and used irregularly, ETI is difficult to perform and can cause substantial morbidity and mortality if positioned incorrectly. Inexperienced medical staff including paramedics may therefore benefit from airway management using
Conflict of interest statement
Supported by a grant of the Government of Vorarlberg/Austria.
The sponsor was not involved in data collection, analysis or interpretation; the manuscript was written by the investigators.
Michael Frass is the inventor of the Combitube® and has received royalties from Covidien. This study was not influenced in any way.
None of the other authors has a personal or financial interest in this research.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Red Cross Vorarlberg, Austria, as well as the Government of Vorarlberg/Austria for financial support of this study.
References (46)
- et al.
European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 4. Adult advanced life support
Resuscitation
(2005) European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 1. Introduction
Resuscitation
(2005)- et al.
Airway management by paramedics using endotracheal intubation with a laryngoscope versus the oesophageal tracheal Combitube and EasyTube on manikins: a randomised experimental trial
Resuscitation
(2006) - et al.
Comparison of a conventional tracheal airway with the Combitube in an urban emergency medical services system run by physicians
Resuscitation
(2003) - et al.
Effect of paramedic experience on orotracheal intubation success rates
J Emerg Med
(2003) - et al.
Anaesthesia in prehospital emergencies and in the emergency room
Resuscitation
(2010) - et al.
Misplaced endotracheal tubes by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system
Ann Emerg Med
(2001) - et al.
Can experienced paramedics perform tracheal intubation at cardiac arrests? Five years experience of a regional air ambulance service in the UK
Resuscitation
(2009) - et al.
The incidence of regurgitation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a comparison between the bag valve mask and laryngeal mask airway
Resuscitation
(1998) - et al.
New airways for resuscitation?
Resuscitation
(2006)
Influence of airway management strategy on “no-flow-time” in a standardized single rescuer manikin scenario (a comparison between LTS-D and I-gel)
Resuscitation
Use of the esophageal tracheal combitube by basic emergency medical technicians
Resuscitation
Application of three airway devices during emergency medical training by health care providers—a manikin study
Am J Emerg Med
The Easytube for airway management in prehospital emergency medicine
Resuscitation
The Combitube as a salvage airway device for paramedic rapid sequence intubation
Ann Emerg Med
Invasive airway techniques in resuscitation
Ann Emerg Med
Endotracheal intubation in the field improves survival in patients with severe head injury. Trauma Research and Education Foundation of San Diego
Arch Surg
Addition of physicians to paramedic helicopter services decreases blunt trauma mortality
Aust N Z J Surg
Road traffic accidents with vehicular entrapment: incidence of major injuries and need for advanced life support
Eur J Emerg Med
Prehospital and resuscitative airway care: should the gold standard be reassessed?
Curr Opin Crit Care
Prehospital rapid sequence intubation for head trauma: conditions for a successful program
J Trauma
Early intubation in the management of trauma patients: indications and outcomes in 1,000 consecutive patients
J Trauma
Interruptions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation from paramedic endotracheal intubation
Ann Emerg Med
Cited by (0)
- ☆
A Spanish translated version of the abstract of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.008.