Training and educational paperAn evaluation of objective feedback in basic life support (BLS) training☆
Introduction
Survival from cardiac arrest remains poor.1, 2, 3 The early management of cardiac arrest is based on the concept of the “Chain of Survival”.4, 5 The correct performance of basic life support (BLS) is a critical step in this chain. Since the majority of cardiac arrests are witnessed,6 bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has been shown to be an important predictor of increased survival to hospital discharge.7, 8 The two major skills required in CPR are chest compressions and rescue breaths. Chest compressions are important for perfusion of vital organs and priming the heart for successful defibrillation.9 Delivery of adequate rescue breath volume is required for ventilation and proper performance is vital to minimise stomach inflation.3, 10, 11
Despite the importance of BLS, studies have shown that these skills are not acquired adequately. Acquisition of BLS skills can be difficult. One study reported that lay rescuers performed only 1.7% of rescue breaths and 3.5% of chest compressions correctly immediately after instruction.12 Ventilation technique has been documented to be poorly acquired13 with ventilation flow rates tending to be in excess of guidelines.9 Retention of BLS skills is also poor, particularly chest compressions and rescue breaths. Moser and Coleman reviewed the retention of these skills. They found that skill retention starts declining as early as 2 weeks after initial training and often reaches pre-training levels after 1 or 2 years.14 The poor acquisition and retention of skills are likely to contribute to the low survival rates from cardiac arrest. A large-scale study has shown that only 2% of patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survived to hospital discharge.1
Feedback devices have been used in an effort to improve the acquisition of CPR skills. Continuous correcting verbal feedback has been shown to do this.15 Wik et al. suggested that this continuous visual–audio feedback from manikins may enable BLS instructors to concentrate on factors other than psychomotor skills. For these reasons feedback may have an important role in BLS training. However, no evidence has been found to show that these skills are retained longer than when using conventional manikin teaching methods.
The aim of this study was to assess whether objective feedback from a manikin during instructor facilitated CPR training improves the acquisition and retention of BLS skills.
Section snippets
Material and methods
We recruited 100 first year healthcare students from the University of Birmingham, UK. All candidates were undertaking a compulsory 8 h peer-led BLS and automated external defibrillator course.16 Ethical approval was granted by the South Birmingham Research Ethics Committee. Verbal consent was obtained from candidates and instructors. The present study was a randomised controlled trial. The candidates were randomised into either conventional manikin (n = 50) or Skillreporter manikin groups (n = 50)
Results
In total, 98 candidates participated in initial testing. (n = 49 for both Skillreporter and conventional manikin groups). The Skillreporter group consisted of 35 women (71%) and 14 men (29%). The conventional manikin group consisted of 29 women (59%) and 20 men (41%). Mean age in both groups was similar. Despite e-mail, text message and telephone follow-up contact, only 66 of the 98 candidates attended retention testing at 6 weeks (Skillreporter group n = 32, conventional manikin group n = 34).
Figure
Discussion
The most important finding in the study was that objective feedback (using a Skillreporter manikin) improved acquisition and retention of chest compression skills significantly 6 weeks after initial training. However, despite these improvements, there was still a significant decay in skills 6 weeks after initial training, with the percentage of correct compressions and ventilations even in the Skillreporter group falling under 50% by 6 weeks.
The quality of CPR is an important determinant of
Conclusions
The use of audio and visual feedback prompts from a resuscitation manikin was associated with improved CPR performance when tested on a manikin both immediately following training and at re-testing 6 weeks later. However, CPR performance declined substantially over time in both groups.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Clare Roberts (Resuscitation Training Officer at George Elliot Hospital) for providing a Skillreporter manikin and to Dr. Jonathan Smart (Laerdal Medical) for providing the VAM system software. Also to David Watkin, Alice Dudley, Sara Mensforth, Saskia Pederson, Mike Helme and Rebecca Dicks for teaching the candidates. The manikins used in this study were provided by a grant from the Resuscitation Council (UK). Dr Perkins is supported by a DH (NIHR) Clinician Scientist Awards.
References (35)
- et al.
Outcome of CPR in a large metropolitan area—where are the survivors?
Ann Emerg Med
(1991) - et al.
In hospital cardiac arrest: missing links in the chain of survival
Resuscitation
(2005) European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2005. Section 1. Introduction
Resuscitation
(2005)- et al.
Cardiac arrest and resuscitation—a tale of 29 cities
Ann Emerg Med
(1990) - et al.
A revised role for the hospital cardiac arrest team?
Resuscitation
(1998) - et al.
The critical importance of minimal delay between chest compressions and subsequent defibrillation: a haemodynamic explanation
Resuscitation
(2003) - et al.
Poor correlation of mouth-to-mouth ventilation skills after basic life support training and 6 months later
Resuscitation
(1997) - et al.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance of subjects over forty is better following half-hour video self-instruction compared to traditional four-hour classroom training
Resuscitation
(2000) - et al.
Improving CPR performance using an audible feedback system suitable for incorporation into an automated external defibrillator
Resuscitation
(2003) - et al.
Retention of basic life support skills 6 months after training with an automated voice advisory manikin system without instructor involvement
Resuscitation
(2002)
Basic life support training for health care students
Resuscitation
European resuscitation council guidelines 2000 for adult basic life support
Resuscitation
A scoring system for basic cardiac life support skills in training situations
Resuscitation
Education in resuscitation
Resuscitation
Trials of teaching methods in basic life support (3): comparison of simulated CPR performance after first training and at 6 months, with a note on the value of re-training
Resuscitation
Uninterrupted chest compression CPR is easier to perform and remember than standard CPR
Resuscitation
CPREzy: an evaluation during simulated cardiac arrest on a hospital bed
Resuscitation
Cited by (108)
External Cardiac Massage Training of Medical Students: A Randomized Comparison of Two Feedback Methods to Standard Training
2020, Journal of Emergency MedicineComparing student nurse knowledge and performance of basic life support algorithm actions: An observational post-retention test design study
2020, Nurse Education in PracticeCitation Excerpt :A review by Hamilton (2005) provides an interesting overview of factors that appear to enhance nurses' skill and knowledge retention during or after CPR training. Multiple studies concluded that overall BLS/ALS skills deteriorate faster than BLS/ALS knowledge (Smith et al., 2008; Spooner et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2012). Ackermann (2009) investigated the use of high-fidelity simulation on the retention of CPR knowledge and skills and found a general decrease in CPR knowledge and skills after three months.
The evaluation of laypersons awareness of basic life support at the university in Izmir
2019, Turkish Journal of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :However, there was no statistically significant difference between the BLS and AED responses of those who had BLS training and who did not have any training before. Practical and simple training, multimedia presentations, and feedback from trainers are considered as factors that positively affect the permanence of the skills.24 Therefore, BLS training programs should be organized in accordance with current guidelines and include practical skills, as well as theoretical information.25
- ☆
A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the final online version at 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.10.017.