Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 70, Issue 3, September 2006, Pages 404-409
Resuscitation

Clinical paper
Major differences in 1-month survival between hospitals in Sweden among initial survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.01.014Get rights and content

Summary

Aim

To explore the rate of survival to hospital discharge among patients who were brought to hospital alive after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in different hospitals in Sweden.

Patients and methods

All patients who had suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest which was not witnessed by the ambulance crew, in whom cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was started and who had a palpable pulse on admission to hospital were evaluated for inclusion. Each participating ambulance organisation and its corresponding hospital(s) required at least 50 patients fulfilling these criteria.

Results

Three thousand eight hundred and fifty three patients who were brought to hospital by 21 different ambulance organisations fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The number of patients rescued by each ambulance organisation varied between 55 and 900. The survival rate, defined as alive 1 month after cardiac arrest, varied from 14% to 42%. When correcting for dissimilarities in characteristics and factors of the resuscitation, the adjusted odds ratio for survival to 1 month among patients brought to hospital alive in the three ambulance organisations with the highest survival versus the three with the lowest survival was 2.63 (95% CI: 1.77–3.88).

Conclusion

There is a marked variability between hospitals in the rate of 1-month survival among patients who were alive on hospital admission after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. One possible contributory factor is the standard of post-resuscitation care.

Introduction

Among patients who suffer an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, overall survival to discharge or at one month is low.1 To improve outcome, the “chain of survival” concept has emerged. It includes (1) early recognition and call for the emergency medical service (EMS); (2) early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR); (3) early defibrillation; (4) early advanced cardiac life support (ALS).

In recent years, evidence indicates that we should introduce a fifth link into the chain of survival, i.e. post-resuscitation care. Until now, there are no clear recommendations about how survivors should be treated in the initial phase after cardiac arrest. Therefore the level of treatment may vary between hospitals and affect the outcome.

This survey aims to explore differences in survival between various hospitals in Sweden among patients who were brought to hospital alive after having suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Section snippets

Patients

Patients suffering a cardiac arrest for whom the ambulance was called were included in the registry. Cases of arrest witnessed by the ambulance crew and patients in whom CPR was inappropriate or who had obviously been dead for a long time, and were not taken to hospital, were excluded. For the others, the standardised form was completed by the ambulance crew.

Registry

This study is based on material collected by the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Registry, which is a joint venture between the Federation of

Statistical methods

Ambulance organisations that brought at least 50 patients to hospital with a palpable pulse on hospital admission were included in the analysis. Each ambulance organisation brought these patients to a single hospital, with the exception of the two largest communities (Stockholm and Göteborg), where the ambulances brought the patients to seven and two hospitals respectively. In the analysis, the seven and two hospitals were counted as one each, as we had no detailed information for each of the

Results

Thirty one thousand one hundred and twenty seven patients suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in whom CPR was attempted and which were not witnessed by the ambulance crew. Of these, 4667 were brought to hospital with a palpable pulse on hospital admission. Since only hospitals with an ambulance organisation from which at least 50 patients were admitted to hospital alive have been included, this means that hospitals to which patients were brought alive by 21 different ambulance

Discussion

In this survey comprising hospitals corresponding to 21 ambulance organisations in Sweden participating in the Swedish Cardiac Arrest Registry, we describe the variation in survival to 1 month among patients who were brought to hospital alive after having suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The survival rate varied between 14% and 42%, i.e. there was a three-fold increase in survival in the most successful hospitals compared with the least successful. There are a variety of possible

Conclusion

In a Swedish survey of initial survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the percentage of patients who survived to 1 month varied between 14% and 42%. This could be explained to some extent by a difference in patient characteristics and factors at resuscitation. However, differences in post-resuscitation care between hospitals cannot be ruled out as a contributory factor.

Cited by (122)

View all citing articles on Scopus

A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the online version at 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.01.014.

View full text