Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 69, Issue 3, June 2006, Pages 395-397
Resuscitation

Clinical paper
Mortality after trauma intubation without drugs in Scottish emergency departments

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.025Get rights and content

Summary

Background

Trauma patients who are intubated without anaesthetic drugs in the pre-hospital phase of care have universally poor outcomes. This study aimed to determine the mortality of trauma patients intubated without drugs in emergency departments in Scotland.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study used the prospective Scottish Trauma Audit Group (STAG) database to identify how many patients were intubated and how many required drugs for intubation between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2002. The mortality of those intubated with drugs and without drugs was determined from the database.

Results

24,756 patients were included in the STAG database. There were 1469 intubations: 1287 with drugs and 182 without drugs. 92.5% of all intubations were for blunt trauma. There was no difference in the proportion of males or median age between groups. Median GCS was 8 (E1M5V2) in the drugs group and 3 (E1M1V1) in the no drugs group (p < 0.001). Median ISS was higher in those intubated without drugs (33 versus 25, p < 0.001). Median RTS and probability of survival were lower in those intubated without drugs (both p < 0.001). Mortality was higher in those intubated without drugs (91.2% versus 29.4%, p < 0.001). Sixteen patients, intubated without drugs, survived. These patients had a higher median respiratory rate (9 versus 0, p = 0.013) and higher median systolic blood pressure (80 mmHg versus 0 mmHg, p = 0.041) than non-survivors.

Conclusion

Trauma patients in Scottish emergency departments who are intubated without drugs have high mortality rates. Outcomes are not universally fatal and aggressive resuscitation efforts may be of benefit to a small number of such patients.

Introduction

Effective airway management is the cornerstone of major trauma management.1 Tracheal intubation is regarded as the gold standard for airway management in the emergency department (ED) for trauma patients who have a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score  8.2 Previous work from the United Kingdom3 and Denmark4 has shown the futility of tracheal intubation without drugs in the prehospital setting for patients with trauma.

Experience and anecdotal evidence suggests that trauma patients who can be intubated without anaesthetic drugs in the ED have a poor outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate the mortality of trauma patients who were intubated without drugs in the ED setting in Scotland.

Section snippets

Material and methods

The Scottish Trauma Audit Group (STAG) database collected data prospectively on the majority of trauma patients reaching hospital alive in Scotland between 1992 and 2002. Data has been collected on tracheal intubation in the ED since 1998.5 This data included whether or not the patient was intubated; speciality of the intubator; use of anaesthetic drugs; GCS score on ED admission; physiological variables (respiratory rate, systolic blood pressure); mortality (patients were followed up to

Results

During the 4-year study period, 24,756 patients were enrolled into the STAG database. 1469 patients were intubated, 1287 (87.6%) with drugs and 182 (12.4%) without drugs. 1359 intubations (92.5%) were for blunt trauma. The two groups were comparable in terms of age and sex (Table 1).

Of 151 patients who were GCS 3 on arrival and were intubated without drugs, 13 survived (8.6%). The survivors had higher median systolic blood pressure (112 mmHg versus 0 mmHg, p = 0.013), higher median respiratory rate

Discussion

8.8% of patients intubated without drugs in the ED following trauma survived in our study. Previous studies in prehospital settings (including physician and paramedic intubation) have suggested that fewer patients survive (95% CI 0.2–8%). It is possible that there is a population of severely injured patients who reach the ED at the limit of physiological compensation who may benefit from aggressive resuscitation.

Although trauma patients who are intubated without drugs have a demonstrably high

Conclusions

Trauma patients who are intubated without drugs have a very high mortality, but it suggests that intensive resuscitation efforts in the ED may yield occasional survivors in this critically injured population.

Conflict of interest

All three authors have no conflicts of interest to declare with respect to this paper.

Acknowledgements

We thank the Director of STAG, Diana Beard, and all the staff of STAG for collecting and recording the data that formed the STAG database. We also thank the Consultants and Specialist Registrars in Emergency Medicine throughout the hospitals contributing to STAG for their help in checking data at their centres. Details of contributors: Colin Graham had the original idea, designed the study, collected data, drafted and edited the manuscript. Gary Wares assisted in study design, data collection

References (5)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (5)

  • Intubation of emergency traumatic head injury patient outside the operation theatre: Cross-sectional study

    2020, International Journal of Surgery Open
    Citation Excerpt :

    Intubation after sedatives administration in this study was 72% but it needs to be improved. A retrospective cohort study in Scottish to determine mortality in the emergency department patients who were intubated without drug administration have higher mortality rates (91.2%) than patients intubated after drug administration (29.4%) [24]. Generally, in UOGCSH there was no application of a traumatic patient intubation standard so after this study, the intubation should be with the application of this standard.

  • The European Trauma Course (ETC) and the team approach: Past, present and future

    2009, Resuscitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    The main attributes of such a team are well recognised: competent team members, good leadership9,10 and excellent cooperation between all the medical specialists involved.11–13 To achieve these, team co-ordination is as important as the adequate performance of separate skills14–17 or the implementation of evidence-based guidelines.18 To address these educational needs an international Working Group was established on behalf of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), consisting of members of the European Society of Trauma and Emergency Surgery (ESTES), the European Society of Emergency Medicine (EuSEM), and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA).

  • In this issue

    2006, Resuscitation
  • European trauma course

    2009, Notfall und Rettungsmedizin

A Spanish translated version of the summary of this article appears as Appendix in the online version at 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.10.025.

View full text