ReviewBringing gender sensitivity into healthcare practice: A systematic review
Introduction
Men and women are not the same when it concerns their health; risks, symptoms, (presentation of) complaints and experience of a disease may vary. That sex and gender matter in health(care) has been demonstrated in a vast amount of studies [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. If sex and gender differences are not systematically taken into account by health professionals inequities may arise. Some recommendations have been given to enhance gender sensitivity in health care [8]. Gender sensitivity means that health professionals are competent to perceive existing gender differences and to incorporate these into their decisions and actions. It is commonly accepted that gender does not exist in a vacuum; gender is part of a socio-political and cultural context. Healthcare organizations are gendered, which means that male and female patients are treated differently and that male and female physicians behave differently [9]. Intersectionality goes beyond gender sensitivity and includes the consideration of other dimensions of difference, like social class and ethnicity. The interaction between these dimensions shapes patients’ health needs [10], [11], [12].
Whereas concerns about gender and health(care) have come to the fore in the scientific arena, gender sensitivity will not automatically be adopted in health care [13]. Implementation literature suggests that innovations within health care generally require comprehensive approaches at different levels [14]. Ideally implementation on an individual professional level parallels implementation at organizational level [15]. For example, a gender-training program can raise the awareness and knowledge of professionals, but organizational learning is required to change working routines.
Despite the body of literature on gender dimensions and disparities between the sexes in health, practical improvements will not be realized effectively as long as we lack an overview of the ways how to implement these ideas [16]. Insight in the obstacles and facilitating factors to enhance gender sensitivity in practice is needed [17]. This article aims to fill that gap providing a systematic analysis of the opportunities and barriers for the implementation of gender sensitivity in health care.
Section snippets
Methods
Articles were identified through searches conducted in five electronic databases: CINAHL, PsychINFO, Medline and EBSCO. A search in the Cochrane library was performed to find comparable review studies. Table 1 outlines the keywords/search terms and resulting output. All searches covered 10 years (January 1998–June 2008); it was expected that before 1998 not much would have been published in this domain. The searches were restricted to English articles for practical reasons, and conducted by two
Characteristics of the studies
Seven studies used qualitative methods, three were quantitative and one was a mixed-methods study. The studies all investigated the implementation of sex or gender related knowledge or theories. With some exception the majority of the studies focused on the healthcare sector. Most studies dealt with European countries. Concerning the implementation of gender sensitivity our results covered opportunities and barriers related to the professional, organizational and political level, as presented
Discussion
Our results show that the implementation of gender sensitivity has a variety of features. Health professionals’ and medical teachers’ attitude towards gender, the culture and men–women ratios within health organizations and the political environment help or prevent the implementation of gender sensitivity in practice. Our results suggest that gender disparities are embedded in health care and a multiple track approach to implement gender sensitivity is needed to change gendered healthcare
Conflict of interest
No competing interest.
Acknowledgements
The present study was carried out with a grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). The authors thank the participants in the training programme and the healthcare practices. Furthermore we are grateful to Sheila Matete for her valuable contribution during the database search.
References (41)
- et al.
Implementation of diversity in healthcare practices: barriers and opportunities
Patient Educ Couns
(2008) - et al.
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care
Lancet
(2003) Gender equity in health: debates and dilemmas
Soc Sci Med
(2000)- et al.
Woman-centred care
Int J Nurs Stud
(2001) Towards gender balance: but will women physicians have an impact on medicine?
Soc Sci Med
(2001)- et al.
Attitudes towards patient gender among psychiatric hospital staff: results of a case study with focus groups
Soc Sci Med
(2006) - et al.
From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients care
Lancet
(2003) Platform for action
Madrid statement. Mainstreaming gender equity in health: the need to move forward
(September 2001)- et al.
From gender bias to gender awareness in medical education
Adv Health Sci Educ
(2009)
Sex and gender: the challenges for epidemiologists
Int J Health Serv
Bringing gender expertise to biomedical and health-related research
Gend Med
Sex, gender and health. Developments in research
Eur J Women's Stud
Gender sensitivity among general practitioners: results of a training programme
BMC Med Educ
Reforming gendered health care: an assessment of change
Int J Health Serv
Investigating gender within health research is more than sex disaggregation of data: a multi-facet gender and health model
Psychol Health Med
Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color
Realising gender-sensitive health care; the role of research
Maintaining gender sensitivity in the family practice: facilitators and barriers
J Eval Clin Pract
Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice
Brit Med J
Cited by (73)
Sex differences in risk factors for mortality after release from prison
2024, Social Science ResearchThe influence of patient gender on medical students' care: Evaluation during an objective structured clinical examination
2023, Patient Education and CounselingValidation of a gender awareness scale in health sciences students
2023, Gaceta SanitariaDiscontinuity of Women Veterans’ Care in Patient-Centered Medical Homes: Does Workforce Gender Sensitivity Matter?
2022, Women's Health IssuesCitation Excerpt :Future research could link clerk surveys to patients via the medical home assignment instead of visits to provide insight into the role that clerks play in women veterans' health care outcomes. Study findings underscore the importance of increased workforce gender sensitivity in improving patient experiences and closing the gender gap in quality and outcomes (Celik et al., 2011; Yano et al., 2014). The VA has increasingly emphasized gender-sensitive care in recent years and has dedicated considerable effort toward building a culture that is more accepting and understanding of the unique needs of women veterans (U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2017).
Menopausal Voice-Related Work Limitation Scale (MenoVWL): Development and Validation
2022, Journal of VoiceCitation Excerpt :Given the complexity of female's reproductive endocrinological system and the impacts of variations in sex steroid hormones on voice quality, future inclusion of this scale in regular medical evaluations seems a step forward in improving health-care of FPVUs. Bringing sex and gender sensitivity to healthcare practice and education is required to improve decision-making and health-related outcomes.60 In addition, it would be worthwhile to apply this scale longitudinally, comparing MenoVWL scores for the same FPVUs at different stages of the STRAW menopausal staging system.