Review
Bringing gender sensitivity into healthcare practice: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.016Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

Despite the body of literature on gender dimensions and disparities between the sexes in health, practical improvements will not be realized effectively as long as we lack an overview of the ways how to implement these ideas. This systematic review provides a content analysis of literature on the implementation of gender sensitivity in health care.

Methods

Literature was identified from CINAHL, PsycINFO, Medline, EBSCO and Cochrane (1998–2008) and the reference lists of relevant articles. The quality and relevance of 752 articles were assessed and finally 11 original studies were included.

Results

Our results demonstrate that the implementation of gender sensitivity includes tailoring opportunities and barriers related to the professional, organizational and the policy level. As gender disparities are embedded in healthcare, a multiple track approach to implement gender sensitivity is needed to change gendered healthcare systems.

Conclusion

Conventional approaches, taking into account one barrier and/or opportunity, fail to prevent gender inequality in health care. For gender-sensitive health care we need to change systems and structures, but also to enhance understanding, raise awareness and develop skills among health professionals.

Practice implications

To bring gender sensitivity into healthcare practice, interventions should address a range of factors.

Introduction

Men and women are not the same when it concerns their health; risks, symptoms, (presentation of) complaints and experience of a disease may vary. That sex and gender matter in health(care) has been demonstrated in a vast amount of studies [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. If sex and gender differences are not systematically taken into account by health professionals inequities may arise. Some recommendations have been given to enhance gender sensitivity in health care [8]. Gender sensitivity means that health professionals are competent to perceive existing gender differences and to incorporate these into their decisions and actions. It is commonly accepted that gender does not exist in a vacuum; gender is part of a socio-political and cultural context. Healthcare organizations are gendered, which means that male and female patients are treated differently and that male and female physicians behave differently [9]. Intersectionality goes beyond gender sensitivity and includes the consideration of other dimensions of difference, like social class and ethnicity. The interaction between these dimensions shapes patients’ health needs [10], [11], [12].

Whereas concerns about gender and health(care) have come to the fore in the scientific arena, gender sensitivity will not automatically be adopted in health care [13]. Implementation literature suggests that innovations within health care generally require comprehensive approaches at different levels [14]. Ideally implementation on an individual professional level parallels implementation at organizational level [15]. For example, a gender-training program can raise the awareness and knowledge of professionals, but organizational learning is required to change working routines.

Despite the body of literature on gender dimensions and disparities between the sexes in health, practical improvements will not be realized effectively as long as we lack an overview of the ways how to implement these ideas [16]. Insight in the obstacles and facilitating factors to enhance gender sensitivity in practice is needed [17]. This article aims to fill that gap providing a systematic analysis of the opportunities and barriers for the implementation of gender sensitivity in health care.

Section snippets

Methods

Articles were identified through searches conducted in five electronic databases: CINAHL, PsychINFO, Medline and EBSCO. A search in the Cochrane library was performed to find comparable review studies. Table 1 outlines the keywords/search terms and resulting output. All searches covered 10 years (January 1998–June 2008); it was expected that before 1998 not much would have been published in this domain. The searches were restricted to English articles for practical reasons, and conducted by two

Characteristics of the studies

Seven studies used qualitative methods, three were quantitative and one was a mixed-methods study. The studies all investigated the implementation of sex or gender related knowledge or theories. With some exception the majority of the studies focused on the healthcare sector. Most studies dealt with European countries. Concerning the implementation of gender sensitivity our results covered opportunities and barriers related to the professional, organizational and political level, as presented

Discussion

Our results show that the implementation of gender sensitivity has a variety of features. Health professionals’ and medical teachers’ attitude towards gender, the culture and men–women ratios within health organizations and the political environment help or prevent the implementation of gender sensitivity in practice. Our results suggest that gender disparities are embedded in health care and a multiple track approach to implement gender sensitivity is needed to change gendered healthcare

Conflict of interest

No competing interest.

Acknowledgements

The present study was carried out with a grant from the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw). The authors thank the participants in the training programme and the healthcare practices. Furthermore we are grateful to Sheila Matete for her valuable contribution during the database search.

References (41)

  • L. Doyal

    Sex and gender: the challenges for epidemiologists

    Int J Health Serv

    (2003)
  • I. Klinge

    Bringing gender expertise to biomedical and health-related research

    Gend Med

    (2007)
  • T. Lagro-Janssen

    Sex, gender and health. Developments in research

    Eur J Women's Stud

    (2007)
  • H. Celik et al.

    Gender sensitivity among general practitioners: results of a training programme

    BMC Med Educ

    (2008)
  • M.K. Zimmerman et al.

    Reforming gendered health care: an assessment of change

    Int J Health Serv

    (2000)
  • M.H.J. Bekker

    Investigating gender within health research is more than sex disaggregation of data: a multi-facet gender and health model

    Psychol Health Med

    (2003)
  • K.W. Crenshaw

    Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color

  • M.H.J. Bekker et al.

    Realising gender-sensitive health care; the role of research

  • H. Celik et al.

    Maintaining gender sensitivity in the family practice: facilitators and barriers

    J Eval Clin Pract

    (2009)
  • R. Grol

    Beliefs and evidence in changing clinical practice

    Brit Med J

    (1997)
  • Cited by (73)

    • Discontinuity of Women Veterans’ Care in Patient-Centered Medical Homes: Does Workforce Gender Sensitivity Matter?

      2022, Women's Health Issues
      Citation Excerpt :

      Future research could link clerk surveys to patients via the medical home assignment instead of visits to provide insight into the role that clerks play in women veterans' health care outcomes. Study findings underscore the importance of increased workforce gender sensitivity in improving patient experiences and closing the gender gap in quality and outcomes (Celik et al., 2011; Yano et al., 2014). The VA has increasingly emphasized gender-sensitive care in recent years and has dedicated considerable effort toward building a culture that is more accepting and understanding of the unique needs of women veterans (U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, 2017).

    • Menopausal Voice-Related Work Limitation Scale (MenoVWL): Development and Validation

      2022, Journal of Voice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Given the complexity of female's reproductive endocrinological system and the impacts of variations in sex steroid hormones on voice quality, future inclusion of this scale in regular medical evaluations seems a step forward in improving health-care of FPVUs. Bringing sex and gender sensitivity to healthcare practice and education is required to improve decision-making and health-related outcomes.60 In addition, it would be worthwhile to apply this scale longitudinally, comparing MenoVWL scores for the same FPVUs at different stages of the STRAW menopausal staging system.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text