Dementia severity and Lewy bodies affect circadian rhythms in Alzheimer disease
Introduction
Sleep–wake regulation in normal adults can best be characterized as an interaction between two discrete processes. The first, circadian process promotes alertness as a function of time of day. The second, homeostatic process builds need to sleep as a function of the duration of prior wakefulness [5], [11]. Aging has been shown to contribute to a deterioration in sleep quality and an increased incidence of reported sleep disturbance [34], including increased wakefulness and decreased time in slow-wave and REM sleep [19], [28]. Age-associated changes in sleep appear to be a consequence of changed homeostatic [8] rather than altered circadian function [12].
Sleep disturbance is a frequent symptom in patients clinically diagnosed with age-associated, neurodegenerative dementias such as Alzheimer’s disease [21], [28], (AD) and Pick’s disease [26], and its presence often precipitates decisions by families and others to seek institutional care [27]. Patients diagnosed with probable AD also show direct circadian disturbances including reduced amplitude and phase-delay of circadian variation of core-body temperature and activity [30], [35] that could be contributing to the sleep disturbance.
These studies have not addressed the question of whether the circadian abnormalities and sleep–wake disturbances seen in patients with probable AD stem from endogenous or exogenous influences. Dementia patients in nursing homes [1], [9], and other institutional environments specializing in the care of patients with neurodegenerative dementia [35] have been found to have lower diurnal and greater nocturnal exposure to light than community-dwelling elderly. These changes have been linked to sleep disturbance in residents of these facilities [31], where opportunities for social interaction and other environmental time cues may be reduced and impact the sleep of nursing home patients. These exogenous influences, however, are distinct from the endogenous, neurodegenerative features of dementing illnesses normally thought to cause the emergence of behavioral symptoms, such as sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances. Evidence to date from the limited literature addressing this question, implicates endogenous factors as a prime contributor to circadian disturbances in patients with AD [18]. Patients studied at the same institution, yet with different dementia diagnoses, have demonstrably different circadian abnormalities [18] supporting the hypothesis that the different neurodegenerative patterns of these illnesses had a major influence on the ultimate, observed circadian disturbances.
However, a diagnostic distinction, that has not yet been examined for circadian disturbance, is dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB), a relatively recently defined nosological entity [24]. Lewy bodies are spherical, eosinophilic, neuronal inclusions composed of low molecular-weight neurofilaments and, when seen in the substantia nigra, are the pathological hallmark of Parkinson’s disease. In DLB, however, Lewy bodies are seen in cortical as well as in subcortical regions of the brain outside of the substantia nigra. AD and DLB share some neuropathological features such as beta-amyloid plaques, however, patients with DLB often lack the neurofibrillary tangles generally seen in AD [17]. This intricate relationship between DLB and AD makes for great difficulties in accurately distinguishing DLB and AD clinically [15], [22].
Patients with DLB have sleep disturbances similar to those with other neurodegenerative dementias, however DLB patients are noted to have greater overall sleep disturbance than patients with AD [16]. Manifestations of their sleep disturbance include some clearly non-circadian phenomena such as a greater incidence of REM sleep behavior disorder, a syndrome characterized by the loss of the ability to maintain muscle atonia during REM sleep [4], [13]. The increased daytime sleepiness and nightime arousals seen in DLB compared to AD could have a source in circadian regulation [16].
In the present study, therefore, we further test the hypothesis that endogenous, disease-specific factors are responsible for the circadian disturbances in AD. First, if central, disease-related processes govern the circadian alterations in AD then the more severe the changes, the more profound the circadian disturbances should be. Braak staging of Alzheimer-related changes [6] provides a standardized assessment tool for the evaluation of severity of pathology which correlates well with clinical progression of the illness [3]. Second, if environmental influences are most important, circadian disturbances in DLB should resemble those seen in AD.
Section snippets
Patients
The subjects were 32 elderly, male, dementia patients hospitalized at the E. N. Rogers Memorial (ENRM) Veterans Hospital in Bedford, MA. Patients were admitted with a diagnosis of probable AD. Following institutional review and informed consent being obtained from the next-of-kin of the subjects, physiological recordings of activity and temperature were obtained every 6 months. Upon the death of the subjects, consent was obtained from the subjects’ next-of-kin for autopsy and resultant donation
Braak stage comparison
All patients with antemortem temperature and activity recordings made within 1 year of death and autopsy diagnosis of either AD or LBD with Alzheimer pathology were included in the Braak stage comparison study (n=19). None of the patients were seen at stages 1–2 (a clinically silent phase of AD), five patients were at stages 3–4 and 14 were at stages 5–6. Of these, one patient (Braak Stages 5–6) did not have a significant circadian rhythm of core-body temperature and was excluded from these
Discussion
Braak stage significantly affects the circadian rhythms of core-body temperature and locomotor activity in patients with dementia due to AD, with or without DLB pathology. The presence of DLB pathology appears to be associated with greater disturbances of locomotor activity than AD, in comparison with the absence of either pathology. This finding may reflect the greater disturbances of sleep in DLB compared with AD patients.
The majority of aggregate raw and calculated circadian measures of
Acknowledgements
Supported by grants AG20654 (Dr. Harper) and AG09301 (Drs. Satlin and Volicer) and AG13846 (Dr. Volicer) from the National Institute on Aging, Bethesda, MD, and by grant NIRG 2135 from the Alzheimer’s Association (Dr. Harper) and by the Department of Veteran’s Affairs, Washington, DC. Presented in part at the Society for Neuroscience Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA November 4, 2000 and the 8’th International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders, Stockholm, Sweden, July 21,
References (37)
- et al.
Neuropathological staging of Alzheimer lesions and intellectual status in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease patients
Neurosci. Lett.
(1993) - et al.
Exposure to light in healthy elderly subjects and Alzheimer’s patients
Physiol. Behav.
(1988) - et al.
From early to late adulthood. Changes in EEG sleep of depressed patients and healthy volunteers
Biol. Psychiatry
(1991) - et al.
Disturbances of sleep and cognitive functioning in patients with dementia
Neurobiol. Aging
(1982) - et al.
Circadian locomotor activity and core-body temperature rhythms in Alzheimer’s disease
Neurobiol. Aging
(1995) - et al.
COSIFIT: an interactive program for simultaneous multioscillator cosinor analysis of time-series data
Comput. Biomed. Res.
(1990) - et al.
Circadian rest–activity rhythm disturbances in Alzheimer’s disease
Biol. Psychiatry
(1996) - et al.
Diurnally changing effects of locomotor activity on body temperature in laboratory mice
Physiol. Behav.
(1998) - et al.
Alterations in the circadian rest–activity rhythm in aging and Alzheimer’s disease
Biol. Psychiatry
(1990) - Ancoli-Israel S, Jones DW, Hanger MA, Parker L, Klauber MR, Kripke DF. Sleep in the nursing home. In: Kuna ST, Suratt...