Review articleNurse-led case management for ambulatory complex patients in general health care: A systematic review
Introduction
Case management has, in recent years, been described as a solution to improve outcomes in complex patients [1], [2], [3]. Case management is concerned with an optimisation of multidisciplinary treatment for complex patients and on the integral care needs of the individual patient without focusing on only one specific illness or population (as in disease management [4]). Case management has been applied in the field of psychiatry for a long time. A review of the literature [6] showed that psychiatric case management in psychiatric health care may be associated with improved compliance and reductions in hospitalization. Over the past decade, more attention has been directed toward the effects of case management in general health care [2], [7], [8], [9], [10].
With respect to the characteristics of complex patients in general health care, these patients have by definition multiple health problems in various health domains. In other words, case management is about flexible treatment plans in mixed populations. We defined complex patients as patients with acute or chronic multimorbid medical condition(s) or symptoms with psychiatric comorbidity [11] and/or social vulnerabilities, with more than one health care worker involved in the care process. These complex conditions have a deleterious effect on health care utilization, quality of life, morbidity, compliance, and mortality in primary care as well as in hospital care [5], [12], [13], [14], leading to an extended duration of hospital stay, more doctor visits and emergency department (ED) visits, and more readmissions [15], [16], [17]. Because of an increase in the number of patients with complex problems due to an ageing population, increasing comorbidity, and a more complex health care organisation [20], [21], it is expected that more patients will need case management in the years to come [3], [7], [18], [19]. We aimed to summarize evidence for the effectiveness of postdischarge nurse-led case management for complex patients by means of a systematic review.
Section snippets
Types of studies
Studies published from 1966 until June 15, 2005, were eligible for inclusion in the review; no language restrictions were applied. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), controlled clinical trials (CCTs), controlled before/after studies (CBAs), and time series studies addressing the effectiveness of postdischarge nurse-led case management for complex patients in general health care.
Types of participants
Studies considered for inclusion in this review focused on ambulatory patients over 18 years of age and
Literature search and study selection
We first performed our search in MEDLINE (928 titles of articles), then in EMBASE (195 additional hits), and subsequently in the Cochrane Library (79 additional hits) and Cinahl (416 additional hits). By reference checking, we identified an additional 20 hits, resulting in a total of 1638 hits. (Fig. 1) Based on titles and abstracts, 105 full-text articles were retrieved, 10 of which met the inclusion criteria [1], [2], [3], [7], [9], [18], [19], [24], [25], [26].
Of the 95 studies that were
Discussion
In this systematic review, we summarized the available literature on the effectiveness of a postdischarge nurse-led case management for complex patients in general health care. The review provides moderate evidence that case management has a positive effect on patient satisfaction. There is strong evidence that case management has no significant effect on the number of ED visits.
However, given the conflicting results on the other outcome variables it was not possible to draw firm conclusions
References (36)
- et al.
Effects of a multidisciplinary, home-based intervention on unplanned readmissions and survival among patients with chronic congestive heart failure: a randomised controlled study
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
A comprehensive management system for heart failure improves clinical outcomes and reduces medical resource utilization
Am J Cardiol
(1997) - et al.
Depression and diabetes symptom burden
Gen Hosp Psychiatry
(2004) - et al.
Psychiatric comorbidity and length of stay in the general hospital. A critical review of outcome studies
Psychosomatics
(1994) - et al.
Publication bias in clinical research
Lancet
(1991) - et al.
The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes. A systematic review
Am J Prev Med
(2002) - et al.
Operationalizing the biopsychosocial model: the Intermed
Psychosomatics
(2001) - et al.
Disease management for the diabetic foot: effectiveness of a diabetic foot prevention program to reduce amputations and hospitalizations
Diabetes Res Clin Pract
(2005) - et al.
Case management in a heterogeneous congestive heart failure population: a randomized controlled trial
Arch Intern Med
(2003) - et al.
Comprehensive discharge planning and home follow-up of hospitalized elders: a randomized clinical trial
JAMA
(1999)
A multidisciplinary intervention to prevent the readmission of elderly patients with congestive heart failure
N Engl J Med
Interventions used in disease management programmes for patients with chronic illness—which ones work? Meta-analysis of published reports
Br Med J
Technology assessment: care management for chronic illness, the frail elderly, and acute myocardial infarction
Case management
Br J Psychiatry
Physician, nurse, and social worker collaboration in primary care for chronically ill seniors
Arch Intern Med
Does increased access to primary care reduce hospital readmissions? Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Primary Care and Hospital Readmission
N Engl J Med
Predictors of health care costs in adults with diabetes
Diabetes Care
Cited by (37)
Clinical and economic outcomes of nurse-led services in the ambulatory care setting: A systematic review
2018, International Journal of Nursing StudiesCitation Excerpt :To the best of our knowledge, this systematic review is the largest review examining the effects of a nurse-led model of care in the ambulatory setting, including 25 original research studies of 180,308 participants. While several reviews exist in the literature (Schadewaldt and Schultz, 2011; Laurant et al., 2005; Latour et al., 2007), this review specifically focussed on studies that examined models of care where registered nurses have the primary responsibilities of care over the patient’s condition. Of the 17 studies that reported HRQoL as an outcome measure (Mårtensson et al., 2005; Nathan et al., 2006; Willems et al., 2008; Borbasi et al., 2011; Chan et al., 2009; Hernández et al., 2014; Sørensen and Frich, 2008; Hill et al., 2009; Verschuur et al., 2009; Young et al., 2013; Chow and Wong, 2010; Buszewicz et al., 2016; Foreman and Morton, 2011; Houweling et al., 2011; Dierick-van Daele et al., 2009; Kneipp et al., 2011), 13 reported equivocal outcomes (Nathan et al., 2006; Willems et al., 2008; Borbasi et al., 2011; Hernández et al., 2014; Sørensen and Frich, 2008; Larsson et al., 2014; Verschuur et al., 2009; Young et al., 2013; Chow and Wong, 2010; Buszewicz et al., 2016; Foreman and Morton, 2011; Dierick-van Daele et al., 2009; Kneipp et al., 2011), three (Mårtensson et al., 2005; Chan et al., 2009; Chow and Wong, 2010) reported superior outcomes and one (Houweling et al., 2011) reported a small reduction in a single HRQoL domain.
A nurse-led case management program on home exercise training for hemodialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial
2015, International Journal of Nursing StudiesReflections on the draft of the Nursing in Medical-Surgical Care speciality training program
2013, Enfermeria ClinicaComprehensive care programs for patients with multiple chronic conditions: A systematic literature review
2012, Health PolicyCitation Excerpt :Moreover, we observed a wide variety in outcome measurements and how they were made operational, and a high rate of missing data (e.g. standard deviations for mean values). These issues are generally acknowledged by researchers investigating comprehensive care [21–23,91–93]. Against this backdrop we considered estimating an average effect of comprehensive care by means of meta-analysis of little value.
Health and health service usage outcomes of case management for patients with long-term conditions: A review of reviews
2020, Primary Health Care Research and Development