Australian normative data for the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering
Highlights
► Australian normative data for the OASES are presented. ► We compared the Australian dataset with datasets from Holland and the US. ► We explored the relationship of age, sex, and stuttering frequency with the OASES. ► Percent syllable stuttered scores influenced OASES scores.
Introduction
The ability to communicate effectively is an integral part of an individual's life (Kagan et al., 2008, Yaruss, 2004). Consequently, it is possible that a communication disorder could result in psychosocial problems that may negatively impact quality of life (Costa and Kroll, 2000, Craig et al., 2009, Shapiro, 1999, Treon et al., 2006). Stuttering is a fluency disorder that can have negative psychological, emotional, and social repercussions (Bothe et al., 2006, Craig et al., 2003, Messenger et al., 2004, Prins and Ingham, 2009, Yaruss et al., 2002a, Yaruss et al., 2002b). Typical problems include elevated levels of social anxiety (Blumgart et al., 2010a, Iverach et al., 2009), a reduced capacity to function in the work environment (Klein and Hood, 2004, Klompas and Ross, 2004), and physical and emotional fatigue from having to constantly monitor speech in an effort to control stuttering. These aspects contribute to the individual's perception of his or her quality of life (QOL; Craig et al., 2009).
The notion underlying QOL investigation is that physical improvement resulting from treatment is no longer considered the only treatment goal. Rather, the individual's perceptions of their personal wellbeing, ability to participate freely in daily activities and levels of self-confidence, are considered equally important to any physical improvement post-treatment (Garratt, 2009, McCabe and Priebe, 2002, Pope and Tarlov, 1991, Yaruss, 2010). While it has been noted that QOL is an important measure when estimating the impact of communication disorders and the efficacy of treatment (Klompas and Ross, 2004, Yaruss and Quesal, 2006), unfortunately QOL research in stuttering is only recently being conducted (Blumgart et al., 2010b, Bramlett et al., 2006, Craig et al., 2009, Franic and Bothe, 2008, Klompas and Ross, 2004, Yaruss and Quesal, 2006). Although generic or general measures of QOL have been widely used to determine QOL impact, there is a need for stuttering specific QOL measures (Franic and Bothe, 2008, Yaruss and Quesal, 2006).
The Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES; Yaruss and Quesal, 2006, Yaruss and Quesal, 2010) is the first published psychometric measure designed to examine functional communication difficulties and QOL from the perspective of individuals who stutter (Yaruss & Quesal, 2006). The measure consists of 100 items in four separate parts or sections: ‘General Information,’ ‘Reactions to Stuttering,’ ‘Communication in Daily Situations’ and ‘Quality of Life’. A detailed description of the development, nature, and ongoing use of the OASES in research has been described elsewhere (Yaruss, 2001, Yaruss and Quesal, 2004, Yaruss and Quesal, 2006). Items are rated on a Likert scale, from 1 to 5 (Likert, 1932). Higher scores for the OASES indicate higher levels of impact. All response choices require an estimate of impact. The scores provide an indication of the extent to which stuttering impacts aspects of the speaker's life. This scoring method does not allow for a zero impact rating. This could be seen as a design shortcoming as it assumes that all people who stutter will experience some impact. The OASES provides an impact rating and impact score, calculated out of 100.
The design of the OASES was based on the World Health Organization's original International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps (ICIDH; WHO, 1980, WHO, 1993) and current ICF International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health frameworks (ICF: WHO, 2001). It was developed using a varied sample of individuals who stutter aged from 7 years to almost 80 years. The OASES is a comprehensive, pen and paper, self-report measure. It was designed as a descriptive outcome measure to supplement other clinician-administered measures of stuttering in order to provide a more complete account of the speaker's experience of stuttering. The contribution of the OASES lies in serving as a monitoring tool in the evaluation of stuttering treatment outcomes.
Empirical data have provided preliminary support for the reliability and validity of the OASES, based on samples collected in the United States (Yaruss & Quesal, 2006). Analyses have revealed a high degree of test–retest reliability for impact scores, with mean differences ranging from 2.1 to 3 (standard error ranged from 1.9 to 2.6). Comparison between impact ratings revealed strong reliability between initial and follow-up administration of the OASES. The authors concluded that the OASES demonstrates acceptable reliability and validity sufficient to support its use in the evaluation of treatment outcomes.
Available normative data for the OASES over the past decade has come exclusively from a North American cohort of 173 adults who stutter, aged 18–78 years. This cohort was drawn primarily from the National Stuttering Association (NSA) database and several clinics throughout the USA. Owing to the likelihood that different English speaking populations as well as culturally diverse populations may have different attitudes towards stuttering (ASHA, 1986, Bebout and Arthur, 1992, Finn and Cordes, 1997, Holland and Forbes, 1986, Leith, 1988), the authors have called for further collaborative normative data worldwide (Yaruss, 2010). Normative data for a Dutch cohort of 138 adults who stutter were investigated (Koedoot, Versteegh, & Yaruss, 2011). This paper reports on the translation process of the OASES from English into Dutch and evaluates the psychometric performance of a Dutch version of the OASES (n = 138). Clearly, additional normative data are required for the OASES, and to date the OASES has not been standardized on an Australian population. The current investigation was designed to provide an Australian normative dataset for the OASES. Specific research aims for this study are: (i) to determine the distribution of the Australian normative dataset for the OASES, (ii) to ascertain whether the USA and Australian OASES datasets are comparable, and (iii) to reveal if a relationship exists between sex, age, and percent syllables stuttered with the OASES.
Section snippets
Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES)
The OASES questionnaire aims to describe the experience and impact of stuttering from the perspective of the individual who stutters. The measure consists of 100 items in four separate sections, each examining a different aspect of the stuttering condition. (i) General Information (20 items) describes general perspectives about stuttering such as perceived fluency, speech naturalness and knowledge about stuttering; (ii) Reactions to Stuttering (30 items) pertains to the speaker's affective,
Australian normative data for the OASES
Table 2 shows Australian normative data for all four parts of the OASES and Total OASES scores, as well as USA (Yaruss & Quesal, 2006) and Dutch (Koedoot et al., 2011) normative data. The datasets reported here follow the original scoring procedures described in Yaruss and Quesal (2006). The Australian OASES measures were normally distributed (Shapiro Wilk W = .99, p = ns). Table 3 shows a comparison of the Australian OASES impact scores to USA and Dutch norms. Again, the similarities in the
Discussion
This study provides Australian normative data for the adult version of the OASES. The Australian OASES dataset is compared to the OASES datasets from North America and Holland. Results suggest that the three international datasets are similar, with the mean scores for the samples of adults who stutter falling predominantly in the moderate impact category. For the Australian and USA datasets, the main area of impact, based on the highest mean score, was for the ‘Reaction to stuttering’ domain,
CONTINUING EDUCATION
Australian normative data for the Overall Experience of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering
QUESTIONS
- (1)
Quality of life considerations are useful in the assessment and treatment of stuttering because:
- (A)
Physical improvement is not the only treatment aim.
- (B)
Physical improvement is the only treatment aim.
- (C)
Quality of life considerations are multidimensional, and include many aspects of the person's life that may be affected by stuttering.
- (D)
Improved self-confidence is the treatment aim.
- (A)
- (2)
The design of the
Elaine Blumgart is an experienced speech pathologist. She has recently completed her doctoral studies at the Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
References (47)
Down's syndrome: Cost, quality and value of life
Social Science and Medicine
(2001)- et al.
An investigation into the personal financial costs associated with stuttering
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(2010) - et al.
The impact of stuttering on the quality of life in adult people who stutter
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(2009) - et al.
Cognitive anxiety as a function of speaker role for fluent speakers and persons who stutter
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(2003) - et al.
Multicultural identification and treatment of stuttering: A continuing need for research
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(1997) - et al.
The relationship between mental health disorders and treatment outcomes among adults who stutter
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(2009) - et al.
The impact of stuttering on employment opportunities and job performance
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(2004) - et al.
Life experiences of people who stutter, and the perceived impact of stuttering on quality of life: Personal accounts of South African individuals
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(2004) - et al.
Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch translation of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering for adults (OASES-A-D)
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(2011) - et al.
Social anxiety in stuttering: Measuring negative social expectancies
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(2004)
Evaluating treatment outcomes for adults who stutter
Journal of Communication Disorders
Assessing quality of life in stuttering treatment outcomes research
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Stuttering and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): An update
Journal of Communication Disorders
Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering (OASES): Documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment
Journal of Fluency Disorders
National Stuttering Association Members’ opinions about stuttering treatment
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Speech treatment and support group experiences of people who participate in the National Stuttering Association
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Clinical management of communicatively handicapped minority language populations
Cross-cultural attitudes toward speech disorders
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
Social anxiety disorder in adults who stutter
Depression and Anxiety
Stuttering treatment research 1970–2005. 1: Systematic review incorporating trial quality assessment of behavioural, cognitive, and related approaches
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Using preference-based measures to assess quality of life in stuttering
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Adults who stutter: Responses to cognitive stress
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
Cited by (32)
Stuttering experience of people in China: A cross-cultural perspective
2023, Journal of Fluency DisordersBehavioral and cognitive-affective features of stuttering in preschool-age children: Regression and exploratory cluster analyses
2023, Journal of Fluency DisordersEvaluating three stuttering assessments through network analysis, random forests and cluster analysis
2021, Journal of Fluency DisordersManual response inhibition and quality of life in adults who stutter
2020, Journal of Communication DisordersResilience in people who stutter: Association with covert and overt characteristics of stuttering
2020, Journal of Fluency DisordersThe relationship between the experience of stuttering and demographic characteristics of adults who stutter
2017, Journal of Fluency DisordersCitation Excerpt :On the one hand, Koedoot, Versteegh, and Yaruss (2011) as well as Yaruss and Quesal (2010) reported no significant correlation between age and the subjective experience of PWS, using the OASES-A. In contrast, Blumgart, Tran, Yaruss, and Craig (2012) who also used the OASES-A in Australian adults, suggested that age and OASES-A impact scores were mildly (though statistically significant) correlated. Further support for the possible positive impact of age on the subjective self-perception of stuttering by PWS, as well as on their cognitive and emotional adjustment, was presented in several qualitative studies.
Elaine Blumgart is an experienced speech pathologist. She has recently completed her doctoral studies at the Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Yvonne Tran is a senior research fellow in the Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. She is also a senior research fellow in the Health Technologies Centre, University of Technology, Sydney.
J. Scott Yaruss is Associate Professor and Director of MA/MS Programs in Speech-Language Pathology in the Department of Communication Science and Disorders, at the University of Pittsburgh. He is co-author of the Overall Assessment of the Speaker's Experience of Stuttering.
Ashley Craig is a Professor in the Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. He has been actively involved in the research and treatment of stuttering over the past 20 years.