Original contributionBattle Casualty Survival with Emergency Tourniquet Use to Stop Limb Bleeding
Introduction
Despite recent positive reports of the use of emergency tourniquets from studies conducted at United States (US) combat support hospitals in Iraq, these devices are still considered controversial by some providers (1, 2). We recently reported major lifesaving benefits and minor morbidity risks with emergency tourniquet use to stop bleeding in major limb trauma (3, 4). Our goal was to see if our preliminary findings would hold true as the war progressed and tourniquets continued to be used. The fielding of tourniquets during the current war and the number of casualties permitted us to study and continue to evaluate performance (5, 6). Improving prehospital hemorrhage control is vital to military and civilian trauma care, and we continue our efforts to fill knowledge gaps regarding first aid of limb-injured patients (7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). There is no consensus on tourniquet use in civilian trauma, but an adequate collection of military data may help to change this. In our continued study of patients who had tourniquets applied in the field or in the emergency department (ED), our objective was to analyze use and possibly refine our understanding of when and if tourniquets should be used as first aid, to refine doctrine and training if indicated. Specifically, our objective was to assess morbidity and mortality associated with tourniquet use.
Section snippets
Study Design, Setting, and Participant Selection
The current report was designed to test the consistency of the findings of our previous reports on emergency tourniquet use (3, 4). The design was an observational study of patient care; there was no experiment or intervention. Before the study began we predetermined the data of interest, that is, possible morbidity as well as the mortality rates with the use of tourniquets. The study was approved by our institutional review board as part of an ongoing prospective performance improvement
Results
The two study periods were similar for the number of patients, deaths, palsies at the level of the tourniquet, and limbs with major shortening, so these data were consistent (Table 1), and therefore we pooled data for further analysis.
Discussion
The main finding of the present report is that the major lifesaving benefits of emergency tourniquet use were observed again, and the consistent finding reinforces the recommendation to consider tourniquets in similar care settings. Additionally, the minor morbidity risks were also consistent with the prior reports (3, 4). Despite different providers, patients, and site investigators, albeit at the same site using the same methods, the consistent findings increase the generalizability of the
Conclusions
Battle casualty survival rates are consistently high with emergency tourniquet use to stop bleeding, and morbidity rates remain low. Evidence indicates that when used at the right time in the right way, emergency tourniquets are lifesaving.
References (40)
Surgical experience in a combat zone
Am J Surg
(1970)- et al.
Prehospital tourniquets: there should be no controversy
J Trauma
(2004) - et al.
War surgery field manual
(1995) - et al.
Practical use of emergency tourniquets to stop bleeding in major limb trauma
J Trauma
(2008) - et al.
Survival with emergency tourniquet use to stop bleeding in major limb trauma
Ann Surg
(2009) Tourniquet use on the battlefield
Mil Med
(2006)- et al.
Prehospital tourniquet use in Operation Iraqi Freedom: Effect on Hemorrhage control
J Trauma
(2008) The causes of death in conventional land warfare: implications for combat casualty care research
Mil Med
(1984)- et al.
Efficacy of a dry fibrin sealant dressing for hemorrhage control after ballistic injury
Arch Surg
(1998) - et al.
Evaluation of possible battlefield tourniquet systems for the far-forward setting
Mil Med
(2000)
Mortality from isolated civilian penetrating extremity injury
J Trauma
Issues related to the use of tourniquets on the battlefield
Mil Med
Physiological evaluation of the U.S. Army one-handed tourniquet
Mil Med
Effectiveness of self-applied tourniquets in human volunteers
Prehosp Emerg Care
Radial pulse character relationships to systolic blood pressure and trauma outcomes
Prehosp Emerg Care
The early treatment of war wounds
Fracture care of friend and foe during World War I
Aust N Z J Surg
Prospective MAST study in 911 patients
J Trauma
A large animal fatal extremity hemorrhage model and evaluation of a polymeric dressing (fatal extremity hemorrhage)
J Trauma
Cited by (247)
Prehospital tourniquet placement in extremity trauma
2023, American Journal of SurgeryExternal Hemorrhage Control Techniques for Human Space Exploration: Lessons from the Battlefield
2023, Wilderness and Environmental MedicineThe Certification Matters: A Comparative Performance Analysis of Combat Application Tourniquets versus Non-Certified CAT Look-Alike Tourniquets
2023, Prehospital and Disaster MedicinePrecise Limb Tourniquet Arterial Occlusion Pressure Determination using Real-Time Ultrasonography and a Capacitive-Based Force Sensor
2022, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
This study was performed at the 10th & 28th Combat Support Hospitals, US Army, (Ibn Sina Hospital, International Zone, Baghdad, Iraq). The trial number is NCT00517166 at www.ClinicalTrials.gov.
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or reflecting the views of the Department of Defense or United States Government. The authors are employees of the US government. This work was prepared as part of their official duties and, as such, there is no copyright to be transferred.