Selected topic: emergency radiologyThe role of computed tomography in diagnosis of blunt intestinal and mesenteric trauma (BIMT)☆
Introduction
Diagnosing blunt intestinal and mesenteric trauma (BIMT) is a constant challenge to Trauma Surgeons and Emergency Physicians. It occurs in less than 1% of blunt abdominal trauma victims 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Delayed diagnosis results in high morbidity and mortality (6). BIMT is commonly associated with automobile accidents, sports injuries, industrial accidents, assaults and falls (7). In Australia, injuries are frequently caused by horse kicks to the abdomen and a 24-h period of observation in the hospital is routinely recommended (8). Motor vehicular crashes with rapid deceleration are the most common cause of BIMT (7). The mechanisms are: 1) crushing effect of seat belt restraints or steering wheel, 2) shearing forces between relatively fixed and mobile parts of the gastrointestinal tract, and 3) burst injuries (“blow out”) that occur when intraluminal pressure exceeds tensile strength of the intestinal wall. Blowout perforations are common in the small intestine, whereas linear seromuscular tears are frequently seen in the large intestine (7).
Hemodynamically unstable multiple trauma patients with significant associated abdominal injuries usually undergo rapid diagnostic studies and laparotomy with a diagnosis of BIMT as an incidental finding. When abdominal signs are equivocal or absent and the patient is hemodynamically stable, further investigations are warranted. The diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL), focused abdominal sonogram for trauma (FAST), computed tomography (CT) scan, and laparoscopy are key diagnostic tools 2, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25. These investigations may determine the presence and severity of injuries because clinical examination alone has inherent diagnostic limitations.
Recognition of early peritoneal signs on frequent bedside re-evaluation can lead to more timely intervention. However, local signs of peritonitis like rigidity, tenderness and rebound may be undetectable due to an altered sensorium resulting from drugs, alcohol intoxication, or central nervous system trauma. In a recent report, 68% of blunt trauma patients had neurological impairment or significant distracting injury compromising reliable clinical examination (2). Presence of fever, leukocytosis, and free air in the abdomen, or other CT scan abnormalities, may be the best clues to occult intestinal trauma, mandating therapeutic surgical intervention. CT scan abnormalities are often subtle and can be ignored or misinterpreted, further delaying timely intervention.
Blunt abdominal trauma patients with positive abdominal signs, including abdominal wall ecchymosis (AWE), contusion or seat belt mark, need close observation and reassessment due to the high association of BIMT 4, 26, 27, 28.
The Institutional Review Board of The Toledo Hospital and Toledo Children's Hospital, Level One Trauma Center approved this study to assess our experience regarding the role of CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis in BIMT.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The present study was undertaken in 1998 to retrospectively analyze patients with BIMT from 1995 and prospectively accumulate data until 2002 at The Toledo Hospital and Toledo Children's Hospital. All patients with BIMT were analyzed for etiology, age, sex, site, injury severity score (ISS), associated injuries, intensive-care length of stay (ILOS), hospital length of stay (HLOS), and outcome.
Helical scanners performed all CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis. All CT scans of the abdomen and
Results
During the period of study there were 8797 patients admitted to the trauma service: 8405 blunt (95.5%) and 392 (4.5%) penetrating traumas. CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis were done in 20.5% (1719) of all blunt trauma admissions. Many patients with blunt trauma had insignificant or no abdominal trauma and had no CT scans. Other abdominal trauma patients with no CT scans were: patients with immediate deaths, hemodynamically unstable patients unfit for a trip to the CT scanner, patients
Discussion
Associated injuries in non-isolated BIMT resulted in higher injury severity scores compared with isolated BIMT with a mean ISS of 38.4 vs. 13.07, respectively (p = 0.000) and a higher mortality (35% vs.12.5%, respectively). Overall mortality in BIMT was 25% (9/36). When three patients who died in the Emergency Department immediately on arrival are excluded, the mortality was 18% (6/33); half of these deaths (3/6) occurred in the first 24 h. Mortality resulted from associated intra- and
Conclusions
Blunt intestinal and mesenteric trauma is comparatively uncommon and often associated with a delayed diagnosis. BIMT was not initially diagnosed in 35% (8 out of 23) of patients due to CT scan misinterpretation, false negative initial scans, or failure to diagnose BIMT in the presence of solid organ trauma. An algorithm for BIMT is outlined in Figure 12. In the absence of hard signs (contrast extravasation, free air), other subtle CT abnormalities mandate close observation and repeat scanning.
Acknowledgements
We thank Shekhar S. Raj, M.B.B.S., Adult Study Coordinator for his assistance in preparing the manuscript, Yahya A. H. Daoud, M.A., Director, Biostatistics Program for statistical assistance, and Rhonda Dressel, Trauma Data Systems Analyst for her help in data retrieval.
References (51)
- et al.
The pathophysiology and management of bowel and mesenteric injuries due to blunt trauma
Injury
(2002) - et al.
Effect of oral contrast administration for abdominal computed tomography in the evaluation of acute blunt trauma
Ann Emerg Med
(1997) - et al.
Free fluid on abdominal computed tomography without solid organ injury after blunt abdominal injury does not mandate celiotomy
Am J Surg
(2001) - et al.
Free fluid on abdominal computed tomography scan after blunt trauma does not mandate exploratory laparotomy in children
J Pediatr Surg
(2000) - et al.
Incidence of hollow viscus injury in blunt traumaan analysis from 275,557 trauma admissions from EAST multi-institutional trial
J Trauma
(2003) - et al.
Blunt bowel and mesenteric injuriesthe role of screening computed tomography
J Trauma
(2000) - et al.
Blast intestinal injurykeys to diagnosis and management
Arch Surg
(1990) - et al.
Hollow visceral injury and blunt trauma
J Trauma
(1998) - et al.
Injuries of the gastrointestinal tract from blunt trauma in childrena 12-year experience at a designated pediatric trauma center
J Trauma
(1999) - et al.
Relatively short delays (<8 hours) produce morbidity and mortality in blunt small bowel injuryan analysis of time to operative intervention in 198 patients from a multi-center experience
J Trauma
(2000)
A review of internal injury from blunt abdominal trauma
Aust N Z J Surg
Presentation of blunt small intestinal and mesenteric injuries
Ann R Coll Surg Engl
Small bowel perforationis urgent surgery necessary?
J Trauma
Evaluation of computed tomography and diagnostic peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma
J Trauma
Prospective evaluation of surgeons' use of ultrasound in the evaluation of trauma patients
J Trauma
2,576 Ultrasounds for blunt abdominal trauma
J Trauma
Sonography in a clinical algorithm for early evaluation of 1671 patients with blunt abdominal trauma
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) in children with blunt abdominal trauma
J Trauma
Early diagnosis of small intestine rupture from blunt abdominal trauma using computed tomographysignificance of the streaky density within the mesentery
J Trauma
Computed tomography in the diagnosis of blunt intestinal and mesenteric injuries
J Trauma
CT findings of mesenteric injury after blunt traumaimplications for surgical intervention
AJR Am J Roentgenol
Blunt intestinal injury in children. Diagnostic and therapeutic considerations
Arch Surg
Bowel and mesenteric injury following blunt abdominal traumaevaluation with CT
Radiology
Intestinal injuries missed by computed tomography
J Trauma
The accuracy of computed tomography in the diagnosis of blunt small bowel perforation
Am J Surg
Cited by (36)
Effectiveness of computed tomography scanning to detect blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries requiring surgical intervention: A systematic literature review
2019, American Journal of SurgeryCitation Excerpt :Fakhry et al. demonstrated that relatively brief delays in diagnosing small bowel injury were directly responsible for almost half of the deaths in their study.4 The appearance of individual CT signs suggestive of BBMI necessitating an operative procedure are well described in the literature and widely recognized among radiologists and trauma surgeons.1–54 Yet, the role of computed tomography (CT) in diagnosing operative hollow viscus injury after blunt abdominal trauma remains controversial with previous studies reporting both high accuracy and poor results.26
Jejunal transection following trivial trauma: Case report and review of literature
2016, International Journal of Surgery Case ReportsCitation Excerpt :In resource limited settings, diagnosis of bowel injuries especially in the setting of trivial trauma presents a challenge, due to limited access to abdominal CT scans and laparoscopy services which if available are considered expensive. Abdominal ultrasonography which is readily available is user dependant and pneumoperitoneum on an erect chest radiograph has a low sensitivity and specificity [13,15,17,18]. Therefore even in absence of a pneumoperitoneum at radiography, the clinician needs to have a high index of suspicion in a patient who continues to complain of abdominal pain following blunt abdominal trauma.
Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT): Simple CT protocol for trauma patient
2015, Clinical ImagingDiagnostic performance of 64-MDCT for blunt small bowel perforation
2013, Clinical ImagingSuperior mesenteric artery pseudoaneurysm after blunt abdominal trauma
2013, Annals of Vascular SurgeryCitation Excerpt :The presence of free fluid is one of the most sensitive and prominent CT features of bowel and/or mesenteric injuries.25 The fluid may be of low attenuation, representing extravasated bowel contents, or of intermediate to high attenuation due to acute hemorrhage or oral contrast material extravasation.34 The presence of a mesenteric hematoma should prompt a careful search for any evidence of bowel injury.
Small-bowel and mesenteric injuries in blunt trauma of the abdomen
2013, Canadian Association of Radiologists JournalCitation Excerpt :Although low in specificity, free fluid is by far the most sensitive CT feature of bowel and/or mesenteric injury [30,31] seen in up to 93% of patients [23].
- ☆
Selected Topics: Emergency Radiology is coordinated by Jack Keene, md, of Emergency Treatment Associates, Rhinebeck, New York