Emotional reactivity and regulation associated with fluent and stuttered utterances of preschool-age children who stutter
Introduction
Attention has recently been paid to emotional factors in childhood stuttering, specifically focusing on characteristics such as emotional reactivity and regulation (e.g., Anderson, Pellowski, Conture, & Kelly, 2003; Conture, Kelly, & Walden, 2013; Choi, Conture, Walden, Lambert, & Tumanova, 2013; Eggers, De Nil, & Van den Bergh, 2010; Eggers, De Nil, & Van den Bergh, 2012; Eggers, De Nil, & Van den Bergh, 2013; Johnson, Conture, & Walden, 2010; Kefalianos, Onslow, Block, Menzies, & Reilly, 2012; Ntourou, Conture, & Walden, 2013; Schwenk, Conture, & Walden, 2007). Although results of these empirical studies as well as related speculation have not clarified all salient aspects of the association of emotion and childhood stuttering, they have provided evidence to support the continued investigation of this association.
Anderson et al. (2003) reported that children who stutter (CWS), when compared to children who do not stutter (CWNS), were more likely to exhibit temperamental profiles consistent with vigilance, nonadaptability to change, and irregular biological functions based on parental completion of the Behavioral Style Questionnaire (BSQ; McDevitt & Carey, 1978). Likewise, Eggers et al. (2010) reported that CWS, when compared to CWNS, exhibited significantly lower inhibitory control and attention shifting, as well as significantly higher anger/frustration, approach and motor activation, based on parent completion of the Dutch version of the Children's Behavior Questionnaire (CBQ-D; Van den Bergh & Ackx, 2003).
Based on three groups of items (i.e., items related to emotional reactivity, emotional regulation and attention regulation) from the BSQ, Karrass et al. (2006) reported that preschool-age CWS, when compared to their CWNS peers, were significantly more reactive, displayed greater difficulty regulating emotions, and had poorer attention regulation. Similarly, Felsenfeld, van Beijsterveldt, and Boomsma (2010) reported that probable stuttering and highly nonfluent children, when compared to typically fluent children, received more problematic scores on parent-based questionnaire ratings of attention, with attention often suggested to be a strategy to regulate emotion (e.g., Rothbart, Ahadi, & Evans, 2000). Taken together, the above empirical findings suggest that certain aspects of emotionality differentiate CWS and CWNS, and these differences may be associated with the difficulties CWS have establishing normally fluent speech.
Results from the aforementioned studies are promising and provide a substantive objective component in the assessment of children's temperamental characteristics (Henderson and Wachs, 2007, Wachs and Bates, 2001); however, it should be noted that these studies address only part of the emotional picture (Campos, Frankel, & Camras, 2004). For example, caregiver reports that are based on relatively long epochs of observation provide insights into more stable, trait-like aspects of emotion (i.e., temperament; Rothbart, Ahadi, Hershey, & Fisher, 2001), whereas behavioral observation provides information on more state-like, variable and dynamically changing aspects of emotion (Cole, Martin, & Dennis, 2004). Therefore, caregiver reports are best considered part of a comprehensive, multi-method means to study emotions in young children (see Campbell & Fiske, 1959 for further discussion of convergent lines of evidence). The use of additional methodological approaches to study emotion augment caregiver reports and address salient realities of childhood stuttering, for example, that stuttering varies considerably within and between situations, conversations, etc.
As an example of a methodological alternative to caregiver reports, Schwenk et al. (2007) used coded behavioral observations to compare the ability of preschool-age CWS and CWNS to maintain attention to a task and ignore irrelevant background stimuli. They reported that CWS were significantly more likely to redirect attention away from a task, via repeatedly looking at nontask stimuli (i.e., noise associated with a motorized camera). These findings were taken to suggest CWS have difficulty habituating to irrelevant environmental stimuli.
In order to further assess CWS's emotional processes, researchers (e.g., Arnold, Conture, Key, & Walden, 2011; Johnson et al., 2010, Walden et al., 2012) assessed two aspects of emotion—positive and negative emotion. Specifically, Johnson et al. (2010) investigated the frequency of expressive behaviors displayed by preschool-age CWS and CWNS after receiving a desired (i.e., positive condition) versus a disappointing gift (i.e., negative condition). In the disappointing gift condition, CWS displayed significantly more negative emotional expressions than CWNS. Furthermore, CWS were more disfluent after receiving the desirable gift than the disappointing gift, suggesting that increased disfluency is related to the emotional tenor—positive in this case—of the associated communicative situation. To further address this issue, Arnold et al. (2011)—on the basis of coded behavioral observations—assessed preschool-age CWS's and CWNS's speech following positive and negative emotionally-arousing background conversations. Findings indicated that decreased duration and frequency of behavioral regulatory strategies were associated with significantly more stuttering for CWS. Using similar coded behavioral observations, Walden et al. (2012) reported that higher stuttering in CWS was significantly related to more emotional arousal/reactivity when associated with lower emotion regulation. Conversely, CWS's stuttering was lower when negative emotion was coupled with regulatory behaviors. This interaction of emotion and regulatory behaviors was taken by Walden et al. (2012) to suggest that emotion is part of the “causal nexus of developmental stuttering” (p. 641). Said another way, if emotion was purely a reaction to stuttering (Alm, 2004), then its regulation would not result in decreases in stuttering. In addition, Walden et al. (2012) also reported that when the first emotion condition (neutral/happy/angry) was emotional in nature (happy or angry), CWS stuttered significantly more during all three subsequent narrative tasks, whereas CWNS stuttered significantly less. This finding suggests that the impact of prior emotion, positive or negative, on subsequent stuttering may linger for some time.
Given the above review, there is growing evidence for the association between emotion and childhood stuttering. Researchers (Arnold et al., 2011, Johnson et al., 2010, Walden et al., 2012) have speculated that conditions that elicit emotion and emotion regulation may divert CWS's attentional resources away from speech-language planning and production. Evidence has shown that CWS, compared to CWNS, exhibit poorer attentional control (Eggers et al., 2010; cf. Johnson, Conture, & Walden, 2012), attention regulation (Felsenfeld et al., 2010, Karrass et al., 2006, Schwenk et al., 2007), and lower efficiency of the orienting subsystem of the attentional system (Eggers et al., 2012). Therefore, emotions may interact with less adaptive attentional processes, and divert resources away from CWS's speech-language system, interfering with rapid and efficient planning for speech (e.g., Anderson and Conture, 2004, Pellowski and Conture, 2005, Weber-Fox et al., 2008). Further, it is possible that this disruption is greatest during the period just prior to and during the overt initiation of speech-language, which is theoretically associated with a number of speech-language planning processes (for review, see Levelt, Roelofs, & Meyer, 1999).
The purpose of the present study was to further empirically investigate the association of emotional reactivity, emotion regulation, and childhood stuttering. Although other empirical studies have assessed differences in emotion between CWS and CWNS (e.g., Eggers et al., 2013), as well as the influence of emotion on stuttering (e.g., Choi et al., 2013), the present study employed an experimental paradigm developed to investigate emotional reactivity and regulation in a more focused and narrow timeframe. Specifically, the temporal epoch immediately prior to and during onset of children's utterances was chosen because it is a time period when (1) stuttering is apt to occur and (2) both speech-language planning and production processes exhibit considerable activity, as well as temporal overlap with one another (for review, see Levelt et al., 1999). We hypothesized that heightened emotional reactivity and/or decreased emotion regulation immediately prior to and during overt production of an utterance would be associated with instances of stuttering.
As an index of emotional reactivity, positive (e.g., smiles) and negative (e.g., frowns) affective behaviors were coded (Calkins, 1997, Dollar and Stifter, 2012, Graziano et al., 2011; Kidwell and Barnett, 2007, Walden et al., 2012). As an index of emotion regulation, fidgeting and repetitive movements were coded (e.g., tapping fingers together, tugging at the ear lobe; Calkins, 1997, Cole et al., 1992; Dollar and Stifter, 2012, Graziano et al., 2011, Kidwell and Barnett, 2007, Stifter and Braungart, 1995, Walden et al., 2012). These measures were employed for various reasons. First, these measures have been previously used to assess the association of emotion and childhood stuttering (Johnson et al., 2010, Walden et al., 2012), and thus provide continuity with emotional behaviors coded in previous empirical studies of preschool-age CWS and CWNS. Second, these behaviors have been extensively used in the field of psychology as indexes of emotional reactivity and regulation in the preschool-age population (e.g., Calkins, 1997, Cole et al., 1992, Stifter and Braungart, 1995). Third, these behaviors change relatively rapidly and were codeable during the temporal epoch of interest, a timeframe during which instances of stuttering are apt to occur.
Measures of emotional reactivity and regulation were assessed prior to and during fluent and stuttered utterances from narratives that were immediately preceded by emotionally-arousing listening conditions. These conditions were similar to those used in previous research on emotion and childhood stuttering (Arnold et al., 2011, Walden et al., 2012), and consisted of auditory recordings of three “overheard” conversations between two adults (happy, angry, and neutral). This method was adapted from empirical studies that found overheard anger increases arousal and distress in preschool-age children (Cummings, 1987, Cummings et al., 1989). We hypothesized that exposure to emotionally-arousing conditions (happy and angry) before engaging in a speaking task would influence emotional processes and speech fluency, both within- and between-groups.
The present investigation addressed two specific issues. The first was whether preschool-age CWS and CWNS differ in terms of emotional processes associated with their fluent speech, and whether such processes were differentially influenced by the emotional tenor of the preceding emotion condition (between-group comparison). We hypothesized that preschool-age CWS, compared to their CWNS peers, would exhibit greater emotional reactivity and lower emotion regulation prior to and during their fluent utterances, particularly following the emotionally-arousing listening conditions. The second issue was whether emotions were more likely to be associated with CWS's stuttered than their fluent utterances, especially following the experimentally manipulated emotion conditions (within-group comparison). We hypothesized that CWS's stuttered, when compared to their fluent, utterances would be more likely associated with increased emotional reactivity and decreased emotion regulation, particularly following the emotionally-arousing listening conditions.
Section snippets
Participants
Participants were eight preschool-age children who stutter (CWS) and eight preschool-age children who do not stutter (CWNS), all of whom were monolingual, native speakers of Standard American English.1
Between-group differences in total disfluencies and stutterings during conversation
Speech disfluencies were assessed during the 300-word conversational sample at the diagnostic visit. As expected, based on participant classification criteria, independent samples t-tests indicated a significant difference in total disfluencies between CWS (M = 29.75, SD = 7.09) and CWNS (M = 12.13, SD = 5.3), t (14) = 5.6, p < .001, effect size (ES) = 2.658, standard error (SE) = .686. Similarly, there was a significant difference in stuttered disfluencies between CWS (M = 15.88, SD = 7.94) and CWNS (M = 2.88, SD =
Overview of main findings
The present study resulted in one main between-group finding and three main within-group findings. The first main between-group finding indicated that the fluent utterances of preschool-age CWS were more likely to be associated with emotion regulation attempts following the happy than the angry condition, whereas CWNS were more likely to exhibit emotion regulation attempts prior to and during fluent utterances following the angry rather than happy condition. The first of three within-group
Conclusions
The present study used direct, coded behavioral observations to assess whether emotional processes predict fluent and stuttered utterances in preschool-age children who do and do not stutter. Between-group findings indicate that during fluent utterances, preschool-age CWS exhibited more regulation attempts following the positive condition (compared to the negative condition), suggesting that they are more apt to regulate emotion associated with positive conditions. Within-group findings
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors received financial support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants from the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) to Vanderbilt University (R01 DC000523-17), by the National Center for Research Resources, Grant UL1 RR024975-01 that is now at the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant 2 UL1 TR000445-06, and a Vanderbilt University Discovery Grant. There are no nonfinancial relationships to disclose.
Acknowledgements
This paper was based on a research project of the first author completed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for his Ph.D. degree at Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232.
The authors would like to thanks Drs. Anthony P. Buhr and Aikaterini Ntourou for their assistance with measurement reliability coding, Dr. Carl B. Frankel for assistance with some statistical analyses on an earlier draft of the manuscript, and Dr. Ellen M. Kelly for review of an earlier draft of the manuscript.
References (72)
Stuttering, emotions, and heart rate during anticipatory anxiety: A critical review
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(2004)- et al.
The development of awareness of stuttering in preschool children
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(1994) - et al.
Emotional reactivity, regulation and childhood stuttering: A behavioral and electrophysiological study
Journal of Communication Disorders
(2011) - et al.
Behavioral inhibition and childhood stuttering
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(2013) - et al.
Temperament, speech and language: An overview
Journal of Communication Disorders
(2013) - et al.
Temperamental surgency and emotion regulation as predictors of childhood social competence
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
(2012) - et al.
Temperament and dimensions in stuttering and typically developing children
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(2010) - et al.
Inhibitory control in childhood stuttering
Journal of Fluency Disorders
(2013) - et al.
Temperament theory and the study of cognitive-emotion interactions across development
Developmental Review
(2007) - et al.
Efficacy of attention regulation in preschool-age children who stutter: A preliminary investigation
Journal of Communication Disorders
(2012)
Relation of emotional reactivity and regulation to childhood stuttering
Journal of Communication Disorders
Early stuttering, temperament and anxiety: Two hypotheses
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Emotional reactivity and regulation in preschool-age children who stutter
Journal of Fluency Disorders
A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Utterance complexity and stuttering on function words in preschool-age children who stutter
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Reaction to background stimulation of preschool children who do and do not stutter
Journal of Communication Disorders
Childhood stuttering and speech disfluencies in relation to children's mean length of utterance: A preliminary study
Journal of Fluency Disorders
Childhood stuttering under “positive” conditions
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Guidelines for screening for hearing impairment and middle ear disorders
ASHA
Sentence-structure priming in young children who do and do not stutter
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Temperamental characteristics of young children who stutter
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Cardiac vagal tone indices of temperamental reactivity and behavioral regulation in young children
Developmental Psychology
Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix
Psychological Bulletin
On the nature of emotion regulation
Child Development
A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis
Statistics in Medicine
A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales
Educational and Psychological Measurement
A power primer
Psychological Bulletin
Emotion displays in 2-year-olds during mishaps
Child Development
Emotion regulation as a scientific construct: Methodological challenges and directions for child development research
Child Development
Young stutterers’ nonspeech behaviors during stuttering
Journal of Speech and Hearing Research
Dual diathesis-stressor model of stuttering
Coping with background anger in early childhood
Child Development
Children's responses to angry adult behavior as a function of marital distress and history of interparent hostility
Child Development
Identification and case selection guidelines for early childhood stuttering
Peabody picture vocabulary test-III (PPVT-III)
The efficiency of attentional networks in children who stutter
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Cited by (27)
Associations between social anxiety, physiological reactivity, and speech disfluencies in autistic young adults and controls
2024, Journal of Communication DisordersEmotion-related regulation strategy use in preschool-age children who stutter
2022, Journal of Communication DisordersCitation Excerpt :One of the favored mechanisms of coding regulatory strategies has been to recognize behaviorally categorized subsectors of self-control strategy use. Attempts to operationalize behavioral regulation or inhibitory control attempts commonly recognize motoric and verbal categories of regulatory actions (Bush, 2006; Jahromi & Stifter, 2008; Jones et al., 2014, 2014b; Nuske et al., 2017). Meanwhile, due to the internal nature of attention, visual indicators (e.g., gaze aversion, visual distraction) have been used as correlates of attentional control, or the executive monitoring component of regulation (Arnold et al., 2011; Bush, 2006; Geva et al., 2013; Mahoney et al., 2011; Ntourou et al., 2013).
The role of temperament in stuttering frequency and impact in children under 7
2022, Journal of Communication DisordersResting autonomic activity in adults who stutter and its association with self-reports of social anxiety
2021, Journal of Fluency DisordersWorking memory in adults who stutter using a visual N-back task
2021, Journal of Fluency DisordersElevated attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms in children who stutter
2019, Journal of Fluency Disorders