Review and Feature Article
Do Corticosteroids Prevent Biphasic Anaphylaxis?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2017.05.022Get rights and content

Anaphylaxis is a severe hypersensitivity reaction that is rapid in onset and can result in death. The pattern of an anaphylactic reaction can be uniphasic (or monophasic), biphasic (also called delayed or late phase), or refractory in nature. The most widely cited definition of biphasic anaphylaxis is a recurrence of anaphylactic symptoms after initial resolution despite no further exposure to the trigger. Corticosteroids are thought by some to prevent the development of biphasic symptoms and, therefore, commonly used in the emergency treatment of anaphylaxis but this has not been systemtically analyzed. In this review, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for articles using “anaphylaxis” combined with the key terms “biphasic” and/or “corticosteroids” and/or “epinephrine.” A total of 31 appropriate studies were identified. Biphasic anaphylactic reactions are more likely to occur in moderate to severe anaphylaxis or when anaphylaxis is not treated with timely epinephrine. Because of the potential detrimental adverse effects of corticosteroids and lack of compelling evidence demonstrating an effective role in reducing anaphylaxis severity or preventing biphasic anaphylaxis, we do not advocate for their routine use in anaphylaxis.

Section snippets

Methods

We defined a biphasic anaphylactic reaction as the recurrence or new symptoms of anaphylaxis after an anaphylactic event without reexposure to the trigger, following an asymptomatic interval of at least 1 hour. Studies that clearly documented reactions meeting this definition were included. We included relevant case series, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, and clinical trials. Studies that did not describe biphasic reactions and isolated case reports were excluded. We followed the

Conclusions

Biphasic anaphylactic reactions are more likely to occur in moderate to severe anaphylaxis or when anaphylaxis is not treated with timely epinephrine. Because of the potential detrimental adverse effects of corticosteroids and lack of compelling evidence demonstrating an effective role in reducing anaphylaxis severity or preventing biphasic anaphylaxis, we do not advocate for their routine use in anaphylaxis.

References (87)

  • W. Alqurashi et al.

    Epidemiology and clinical predictors of biphasic reactions in children with anaphylaxis

    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

    (2015)
  • S. Lee et al.

    Predictors of biphasic reactions in the emergency department for patients with anaphylaxis

    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract

    (2014)
  • D.V. Smit et al.

    Anaphylaxis presentations to an emergency department in Hong Kong: incidence and predictors of biphasic reactions

    J Emerg Med

    (2005)
  • O. Jirapongsananuruk et al.

    Features of patients with anaphylaxis admitted to a university hospital

    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

    (2007)
  • R. Confino-Cohen et al.

    Allergen immunotherapy-induced biphasic systemic reactions: incidence, characteristics, and outcome: a prospective study

    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

    (2010)
  • B.S. Ko et al.

    Biphasic reactions in patients with anaphylaxis treated with corticosteroids

    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

    (2015)
  • A. Sugiura et al.

    Combined use of ECMO and hemodialysis in the case of contrast-induced biphasic anaphylactic shock

    Am J Emerg Med

    (2016)
  • L.B. Grabenhenrich et al.

    Anaphylaxis in children and adolescents: the European Anaphylaxis Registry

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2016)
  • A.M. Altman et al.

    Anaphylaxis in America: a national physician survey

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2015)
  • A.K. Ellis et al.

    Incidence and characteristics of biphasic anaphylaxis: a prospective evaluation of 103 patients

    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

    (2007)
  • S.A. Bock et al.

    Further fatalities caused by anaphylactic reactions to food, 2001-2006

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2007)
  • R.S. Pumphrey et al.

    Further fatal allergic reactions to food in the United Kingdom, 1999-2006

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2007)
  • F.E. Simons et al.

    Anaphylaxis in the community: learning from the survivors

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2009)
  • E. Hochstadter et al.

    Increasing visits for anaphylaxis and the benefits of early epinephrine administration: a 4-year study at a pediatric emergency department in Montreal, Canada

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2016)
  • J.T. Fleming et al.

    Early treatment of food-induced anaphylaxis with epinephrine is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization

    J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract

    (2015)
  • A.K. Ellis

    Priority role of epinephrine in anaphylaxis further underscored–the impact on biphasic anaphylaxis

    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

    (2015)
  • P. Vadas

    The platelet-activating factor pathway in food allergy and anaphylaxis

    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

    (2016)
  • P. Vadas et al.

    Platelet-activating factor, histamine, and tryptase levels in human anaphylaxis

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2013)
  • P. Vadas et al.

    Effect of epinephrine on platelet-activating factor-stimulated human vascular smooth muscle cells

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2012)
  • P. Lieberman et al.

    Anaphylaxis—a practice parameter update 2015

    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

    (2015)
  • E.C. Matsui et al.

    Weighing the evidence: bias and confounding in epidemiologic studies in allergy/immunology

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2017)
  • H.A. Sampson et al.

    Second symposium on the definition and management of anaphylaxis: summary report–second National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network symposium

    Ann Emerg Med

    (2006)
  • S.A.M. Kularatne et al.

    Efficacy of intravenous hydrocortisone administered 2-4 h prior to antivenom as prophylaxis against adverse drug reactions to snake antivenom in Sri Lanka: an open labelled randomized controlled trial

    Toxicon

    (2016)
  • M.S. Davenport et al.

    The evidence for and against corticosteroid prophylaxis in at-risk patients

    Radiol Clin North Am

    (2017)
  • D. Liu et al.

    A practical guide to the monitoring and management of the complications of systemic corticosteroid therapy

    Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol

    (2013)
  • S. Kayani et al.

    Adverse behavioral effects of treatment for acute exacerbation of asthma in children: a comparison of two doses of oral steroids

    Chest

    (2002)
  • A. Patel et al.

    Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to corticosteroids

    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol

    (2015)
  • F.E. Simons et al.

    International consensus on (ICON) anaphylaxis

    World Allergy Organ J

    (2014)
  • J.P. Ioannidis et al.

    Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis

    Lancet

    (2014)
  • P.K. Smith et al.

    Risk multipliers for severe food anaphylaxis

    World Allergy Organ J

    (2015)
  • P. Lieberman et al.

    The diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis practice parameter: 2010 update

    J Allergy Clin Immunol

    (2010)
  • CIHI

    Anaphylaxis and allergy in the emergency department. 2015

  • A. Sheikh et al.

    Trends in national incidence, lifetime prevalence and adrenaline prescribing for anaphylaxis in England

    J R Soc Med

    (2008)
  • Cited by (87)

    • Anaphylaxis: A 2023 practice parameter update

      2024, Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology
    • Allergic Acute Coronary Syndrome—Kounis Syndrome

      2023, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
    • Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions

      2023, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
    • Anaphylaxis: Emergency Department Treatment

      2023, Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Conflicts of interest: A. K. Ellis has received research support and consultancy/speaker fees from Pfizer; has received consultancy fees from ALK Abello, Merck, and Novartis; has received research support from Circassia Ltd, Green Cross, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Sanofi, and SunPharma Advance Research Corporation; and has received lecture fees from Aralez, AstraZeneca, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, and Takeda. W. Alqurashi declares no relevant conflicts of interest.

    View full text