ReviewTiming of surgery for hip fractures: A systematic review of 52 published studies involving 291,413 patients
Introduction
The theoretical advantage of allowing a delay from admission to surgery for a hip fracture is that it will allow some time for physiological stabilisation after the injury. This may be particularly relevant after an extracapsular fracture, in which a more extensive blood loss from the fracture site occurs. Other potential advantages of delaying surgery are that it allows more time for assessment of the patient and for correction of dehydration and fluid replacement. Many hip fracture patients are found to be hypovolaemic at the time of surgery.29 Possible adverse effects of delaying surgery are there may be an increase in the incidence of the complications of recumbency, namely pressure sores, thromboembolic complications, urinary infection and pneumonia. This may even be reflected in an increase in mortality. Delaying surgery will prolong the pain and discomfort involved with the injury and may also increase the length of hospital stay and may possibly reduce the chance of a successful rehabilitation and the patient returning home.
This study aimed to review previous published studies on this topic with the aim of developing a consensus from the literature for the optimum timing of surgery for an acute hip fracture.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
The search strategy was using Medline and Pubmed searches on all studies from 1960 till October 2007, which had timing (or delay) of surgery and hip fractures in the abstract. In addition retrieved articles were studied for mention of other relevant studies within the list of references. We included only those studies which reported on the timing of surgery related to outcomes of mortality (within the follow-up period of that study), post-operative medical complications, length of hospital stay
Results
Table 2 lists the characteristics and methodology assessment score of the included studies. Table 3 details the results for the included studies for the outcomes of mortality, post-operative complications, length of hospital stay and the failure of patients to return back to where they were admitted from. The studies are listed grouped for those with similar methodology.
Amongst prospective studies with adjustment, Moran et al.’s study37 included 28 cases out of the 2148 patients studied who had
Discussion
Ideally the question of the timing of surgery should be resolved with a randomised trial with a large number of patients, but because of the ethical issues involved such a study is unlikely to be undertaken. We have identified only one study47 which randomised 70 hip fracture patients to either intensive physiological monitoring on an intensive care unit over the perioperative period or ‘standard monitoring’. The mean time to surgery was 3.7 days in the standard group vs. 6.5 days in
Conclusions
In conclusion the results of this review indicate that delaying surgery may not affect mortality but it is likely to increase morbidity, particularly the incidence of pressure sores and will increase hospital stay. Delaying surgery will inevitably prolong the distress involved from this injury. Therefore patients admitted to hospital with a hip fracture, in whom there are no specific conditions that can be improved prior to surgery, should have their operation as soon as possible after
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in connection with this paper.
References (59)
Survival following hip fracture. Long term follow-up of 607 patients
J Chronic Dis
(1972)- et al.
Mortality after hip fracture: results of operation within 12 h of admission
Injury
(1992) - et al.
Post-operative mortality related to waiting time for hip fracture surgery
Injury
(2004) - et al.
Factors influencing survival following fractures of the upper end of the femur
Injury
(1986) - et al.
Prospective, multi-centre trial of mortality following general or spinal anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery in the elderly
Br J Anaes
(1987) - et al.
The timing of surgery for intertrochanteric femoral fractures
Injury
(1988) Operation in hip fracture patients—analysis of the time factor
Injury
(1990)- et al.
The effect of the timing of hip fracture surgery on the activity of daily living and mortality in elderly
Arch Gerontol Geriatr
(2004) - et al.
The effectiveness of orthopaedic trauma theatres in decreasing morbidity and mortality: a study of 701 displaced subcapital hip fractures in two trauma centres
Injury
(2005) - et al.
Predicting survival after treatment for fracture of the proximal femur and the effect of delays to surgery
J Clin Epidemiol
(2003)
Factors affecting the outcome after proximal femoral fractures
Injury
The effects of time-to-surgery on mortality and morbidity in patients following hip fracture
Am J Med
What are the costs of queuing for hip fracture surgery in Canada?
J Health Econ
Significance of urgent (within 6 h) internal fixation in the management of fractures of the neck of the femur
Injury
Death after proximal femoral fracture–an autopsy study
Injury
New classification of physical status
Anesthesiology
Is the delay to surgery for isolated hip fracture predictive of outcome in efficient systems?
J Trauma
Mortality associated with delay in operation after hip fracture: observational study
BMJ
The effect of surgical delay on mortality of patients with hip fractures
J Bone Joint Surg [Br]
Anaesthesia for the fractured hip: a survey of 200 cases
Anesth Analg
The influence of immediate surgical treatment of proximal femoral fractures on mortality and quality of life. Operation within six hours of the fracture versus later than six hours
J Bone Joint Surg [Br]
The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions
J Epidemiol Commun Health
Risk factors influencing mortality after bipolar hemiarthroplasty in the treatment of fracture of the femoral neck
Clin Orthop Relat Res
Correspondence. Mortality associated with delay in operation after hip fracture: … but Italian data seem to contradict study findings
BMJ
Morbidity and mortality after hip fracture: the impact of operative delay
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Influence of health status and the timing of surgery on mortality in hip fracture patients
Am J Orthop
Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly: does operative delay for medical reasons affect short-term outcome?
Age Ageing
What is the role of timing in the surgical and rehabilitative care of community-dwelling older persons with acute hip fracture?
Arch Intern Med
Results of early and delayed surgical fixation of hip fractures in the elderly: a comparative retrospective study
Bull Hosp Jt Dis
Cited by (304)
Should recommended laboratory-test cut-offs allowing surgery be followed for proximal femoral fractures in patients on direct oral anticoagulant therapy?
2024, Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and ResearchTechniques for cemented hemiarthroplasty
2024, Orthopaedics and TraumaReducing morbidity and mortality in the hip fracture patient group
2024, Orthopaedics and Trauma