Exploring factors associated with pressure ulcers: A data mining approach

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.08.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Pressure ulcers are associated with a nearly three-fold increase in in-hospital mortality. It is essential to investigate how other factors besides the Braden scale could enhance the prediction of pressure ulcers. Data mining modeling techniques can be beneficial to conduct this type of analysis. Data mining techniques have been applied extensively in health care, but are not widely used in nursing research.

Purpose

To remedy this methodological gap, this paper will review, explain, and compare several data mining models to examine patient level factors associated with pressure ulcers based on a four year study from military hospitals in the United States.

Methods

The variables included in the analysis are easily accessible demographic information and medical measurements. Logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and multivariate adaptive regression splines were compared based on their performance and interpretability.

Results

The random forests model had the highest accuracy (C-statistic) with the following variables, in order of importance, ranked highest in predicting pressure ulcers: days in the hospital, serum albumin, age, blood urea nitrogen, and total Braden score.

Conclusion

Data mining, particularly, random forests are useful in predictive modeling. It is important for hospitals and health care systems to use their own data over time for pressure ulcer risk prediction, to develop risk models based upon more than the total Braden score, and specific to their patient population.

Introduction

Pressure ulcers (PU) are a substantial burden for patients and for the health care system in general. The National Patient Care Safety Monitoring Study (Lyder et al., 2012) of over 51,000 patients found that 4.5% of Medicare beneficiaries developed a pressure ulcer during their hospital stay and 5.8% had a pressure ulcer on admission. Pressure ulcers regardless of whether they were present on admission were associated with a nearly three-fold increase in in-hospital mortality, 69% increase in 30-day mortality, and an increased length of stay of 6.4 days (Lyder et al., 2012). As of 2008, hospital acquired stage III and IV pressure ulcers are no longer reimbursed by the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), leaving the hospitals themselves to absorb the cost of care for patients, which is estimated at $43,180 per patient (Armstrong et al., 2008). Thus it is imperative to discover factors associated with both community and hospital acquired pressure ulcers and institute additional care measures to prevent their occurrence.

Because the causative factors for pressure ulcers are “multifactorial and not well understood” (Benoit and Mion, 2012, p. 341), it is critical for hospitals, nursing homes, and home care agencies to systematically monitor patients for pressure ulcer rates, assess risk, and enhance prevention efforts. Although not all pressure ulcers are avoidable (Black et al., 2011), frequent monitoring may lead to better risk predictions and more thoughtful application of resources (i.e., evidence-based nursing preventive interventions such as turning and repositioning) to those who need it most. As more hospitals adopt electronic medical records, the large clinical data repositories could help improve clinical care through the study of their own best practices and lessons learned directly from their patients. Analyzing clinical data collected from discharge abstracts or directly from clinical records and comparing those who developed or did not develop a pressure ulcer can inform problem identification in quality improvement. Data mining modeling techniques can be beneficial to conduct this analysis. The purpose of this paper is to build and compare data mining models for pressure ulcer prevalence (both community and hospital acquired) and determine the variables that are associated with pressure ulcers based on a four year study database collected from 12 military hospitals. The variables included in the analysis are easily accessible demographical information and medical measurements. We carefully selected a group of data mining techniques that not only supply high predictive accuracy but also allow for meaningful interpretations. The Braden scale developed by Bergstrom et al. (1987) is one currently available tool for assessing pressure ulcer risk. Given the multifaceted nature of pressure ulcers, it is of keen interest to see whether and how other factors could enhance the performance of predicting pressure ulcers when combined with the Braden scale. The eventual wide scale use of electronic medical records will enable hospitals to apply these data mining techniques to their own patient level data to determine factors associated with pressure ulcers.

Section snippets

Background

Identifying patients who may have a pressure ulcer on admission to a health care facility or who may develop one during hospitalization is the starting point for primary, secondary and tertiary preventive activities aimed at reducing this costly and debilitating complication. A recent systematic review of 54 pressure ulcer studies (Coleman et al., 2013) identified three primary risk factors: mobility level, perfusion, and skin status. Other secondary risk factors that emerged from this

Data mining models

There are numerous methods and procedures available for exploring factors associated with binary outcome (i.e., prevalence of pressure ulcers), but of course, the model choices depend on the research aims. Because the research objectives were to accurately predict pressure ulcer prevalence and identify clinically relevant factors that are associated with pressure ulcers, we cautiously selected four predictive modeling methods: logistic regression, decision trees, random forests (RF), and

Exploratory data analysis

The full dataset contained 1653 patients, among which 333 (20%) had a pressure ulcer of any stage. Table 1 shows the demographic and summary statistics of variables included in the analysis for the full dataset. Serum Albumin had the highest percent missing (753/1653 = .5) followed by Creatinine (.3) and BUN (.2). The overall average patient was 54 years old (SD 21.5; range 18–93) and was in the hospital nearly 11 days (SD 23.5; range 1–468). The Braden score for patients without pressure ulcers

Discussion

The prevalence of all stages of pressure ulcers among this sample for the entire dataset, regardless of whether hospital-acquired or not, was 20.3%, a much higher rate than nationally reported in the recent literature. During our data collection period, a 14–17% prevalence in acute care settings was reported (Whittington and Briones, 2004). There is evidence that pressure ulcers have decreased over time with national rates of 13.5 and 12.3 in 2008 and 2009, respectively (Vangilder et al., 2009

Conclusion

Data mining is a useful method when one has a dataset of many variables that are potentially associated with an outcome. In particular, the Random Forest model was most predictive of pressure ulcers in this sample. The final predictive model included the following in order of importance to predicting pressure ulcers: days in the hospital, serum albumin, age, BUN, and total Braden score. It is important for hospitals and health care systems to use their own data over time for pressure ulcer risk

References (42)

  • N. Lahmann et al.

    Relation between pressure, friction and pressure ulcer categories: a secondary data analysis of hospital patients using CHAID methods

    Int. J. Nurs. Stud.

    (2011)
  • T.-T. Lee et al.

    Application of data mining to identification of critical factors in patient falls using a web-based reporting system

    Int. J. Med. Inf.

    (2011)
  • F. Almasalha et al.

    Data mining nursing care plans of end-of-life patients: a study to improve healthcare decision making

    Int. J. Nurs. Knowl.

    (2013)
  • D.G. Armstrong et al.

    New opportunities to improve pressure ulcer prevention and treatment

    J. Wound. Ostomy Continence Nurs.

    (2008)
  • M.M. Baharestani et al.

    Dilemmas in measuring and using pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence: an international consensus

    Int. Would J.

    (2009)
  • K. Balzer et al.

    The Norton, Waterlow, Braden, and Care Dependency Scales. Comparing their validity when identifying patients’ presure sore risk

    J. Wound. Ostomy Continence Nurs.

    (2007)
  • R. Benoit et al.

    Risk factors for pressure ulcer development in critically ill patients: a conceptual model to guide research

    Res. Nurs. Health

    (2012)
  • N. Bergstrom et al.

    The Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk

    Nurs. Res.

    (1987)
  • M. Berry et al.

    Data Mining Techniques for Marketing, Sales, and Customet Relationship Management

    (2004)
  • J.M. Black et al.

    Pressure ulcers: avoidable or unavoidable? Results of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Consensus Conference

    Ostomy Wound Manage.

    (2011)
  • B. Braden

    The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk: reflections after 25 years

    Adv. Skin Would Care

    (2012)
  • P. Breheny et al.

    Coordinate descent algorithms for nonconvex penalized regression, with applications to biological feature selection

    Ann. Appl. Stat.

    (2011)
  • L. Breiman et al.

    Classification and Regression Trees

    (1984)
  • L. Brieman

    Random forests

    Mach. Learn.

    (2001)
  • L. Brieman et al.

    Package ‘Randomforest’. Random forests for classification and regression

    (2011)
  • B.-W. Cheng et al.

    Enhancing care services quality of nursing homes using data mining

    Total Qual. Manag.

    (2005)
  • C. Coleman et al.

    Patient risk factors for pressure ulcer development: systematic review

    Int. J. Nurs. Stud.

    (2013)
  • J. Cox

    Predictors of pressure ulcers in adult critical care patients

    Am. J. Crit. Care

    (2011)
  • M.F. Cremasco et al.

    Pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit: the relationship between nusing workload, illness severity and pressure ulcer risk

    J. Clin. Nurs.

    (2012)
  • D.R. Crumble et al.

    Development of an evidence-based pressure ulcer program at the National Naval Medical Center: Nurses’ role in risk factor assessment, prevention, and intervention among young service members returning from OIF/OEF

    Nurs. Clin. North Am.

    (2010)
  • R. Cutler et al.

    Random forests for classification in ecology

    Ecology

    (2007)
  • Cited by (72)

    • Incidence and risk factors associated with hospital-acquired pressure ulcers following total hip arthroplasty: A retrospective nationwide inpatient sample database study

      2022, Journal of Tissue Viability
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, postoperative complications may occur. Pressure ulcers (PUs) are common complications to affect bedridden or frail hospitalized patients globally, posing substantial burden on the patients and the healthcare system [3–7]. The elderly are particularly vulnerable [5,7–9].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text