Original article
Passive Stretching Does Not Enhance Outcomes in Patients With Plantarflexion Contracture After Cast Immobilization for Ankle Fracture: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Presented to the 8th International Physiotherapy Congress, May 15–18, 2004, Adelaide, Australia.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.11.017Get rights and content

Abstract

Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Nightingale EJ, Taylor DA, Evans TM, Robertson GJ, Gupta SK, Penn J. Passive stretching does not enhance outcomes in patients with plantarflexion contracture after cast immobilization for ankle fracture: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1118–26.

Objective

To compare the efficacy of short- and long-duration passive stretches with a control treatment for the management of plantarflexion contracture after cast immobilization for ankle fracture.

Design

Assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial.

Setting

Hospital physical therapy outpatient departments.

Participants

Adults with plantarflexion contracture (N=150) after cast immobilization for ankle fracture. All subjects were weight bearing or partial weight bearing.

Interventions

Exercise only, exercise plus short-duration passive stretch, and exercise plus long-duration passive stretch. All subjects had a 4-week course of exercises. In addition, subjects in the short-duration stretch plus exercise group completed 6 minutes of stretching per day, and subjects in the long-duration stretch plus exercise group completed 30 minutes of stretching per day.

Main Outcome Measures

Lower Extremity Functional Scale and passive dorsiflexion range of motion with the knee bent and straight at baseline, and at 4 weeks and 3 months postintervention.

Results

One hundred thirty-nine (93%) subjects completed the 4-week assessment and 134 (89%) subjects completed the 3-month assessment. There were no statistically significant or clinically important between-group differences for the primary outcomes.

Conclusions

The addition of passive stretching confers no benefit over exercise alone for the treatment of plantarflexion contracture after cast immobilization for ankle fracture.

Section snippets

Participants

Subjects were recruited from the plaster clinics of 2 large teaching hospitals (Royal North Shore Hospital and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia). All patients referred to the outpatient PT service who met the following criteria were invited to participate: (1) ankle fracture treated with cast immobilization (with or without surgical fixation), (2) cast removed in preceding 5 days, (3) approval received from orthopedic specialist to weight-bear as tolerated or partial weight-bear,

Participants

The subject flow is illustrated in figure 1. One hundred thirty-nine subjects (139/150; 93%) completed the 4-week assessment and 134 (134/150; 89%) completed the 3-month assessment.

Subject characteristics and baseline values of primary variables are listed in table 1. There were no clinically important differences between the groups at baseline for any of the variables listed in table 1, although there were more right-sided fractures in the short duration stretch group than in the exercise only

Discussion

The principal finding of this trial was that the addition of a program of passive stretches confers no benefit over exercise alone in treating plantarflexion contracture after cast immobilization for ankle fracture. There were no statistically significant or clinically worthwhile differences between the exercise only, short-duration stretch plus exercise, and long-duration stretch plus exercise groups for perceived disability or passive dorsiflexion ROM. This result is consistent with those of

Conclusions

The addition of a program of passive stretches confers no benefit over exercise alone for the treatment of plantarflexion contracture after cast immobilization for ankle fracture.

Acknowledgments

The contributions of Stephanie Lanzarone and Adrian Byak, who were employed as assessors, and Dr Jeffrey Petchell (Orthopaedic Surgeon, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital), who performed the fracture severity ratings, are gratefully acknowledged.

References (45)

  • A.M. Moseley et al.

    Measurement of passive ankle dorsiflexionprocedure and reliability

    Aust J Physiother

    (1991)
  • J.G. Kennedy et al.

    An evaluation of the Weber classification of ankle fractures

    Injury

    (1998)
  • A.M. Moseley et al.

    Normative data for passive ankle plantarflexion-dorsiflexion flexibility

    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)

    (2001)
  • A.M. Carlsson

    Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale

    Pain

    (1983)
  • A.J. Beurskens et al.

    Responsiveness of functional status in low back paina comparison of different instruments

    Pain

    (1996)
  • B.R. Singer et al.

    Epidemiology of fractures in 15,000 adultsthe influence of age and gender

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1998)
  • J.D. Michelson

    Fractures about the ankle

    J Bone Joint Surg Am

    (1995)
  • B.M. Chesworth et al.

    Comparison of passive stiffness variables and range of motion in uninvolved and involved ankle joints of patients following ankle fractures

    Phys Ther

    (1995)
  • W.K. Pun et al.

    A study of function and residual joint stiffness after functional bracing of tibial shaft fractures

    Clin Orthop

    (1991)
  • R.D. Herbert et al.

    The effect of position of immobilisation on resting length, resting stiffness, and weight of the soleus muscle of the rabbit

    J Orthop Res

    (1993)
  • J.C. Tabary et al.

    Physiological and structural changes in the cat’s soleus muscle due to immobilization at different lengths by plaster casts

    J Physiol

    (1972)
  • P.E. Williams et al.

    Connective tissue changes in immobilised muscle

    J Anat

    (1984)
  • Cited by (59)

    • Three-week joint immobilization increases anterior-posterior laxity without alterations in mechanical properties of the anterior cruciate ligament in the rat knee

      2020, Clinical Biomechanics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Joint immobilization is often used to treat orthopedic disorders, including ligament injuries, fractures, and dislocation. ( Ardevol et al., 2002; Eiff et al., 1994; Hendey, 2016; Kim et al., 2003; Lysholm et al., 1982; Moseley et al., 2005; Paterson et al., 2010). Joint immobilization facilitates healing of the injured tissues by avoiding the harmful stimuli such as excessive lengthening of joint tissues, but exerts adverse effects on uninjured tissues via the reduction of mechanical stress (Kannus and Jarvinen, 1990).

    • Stretch for the treatment and prevention of contracture: an abridged republication of a Cochrane Systematic Review

      2017, Journal of Physiotherapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      There was no obvious explanation for this but the extreme results all favouring the experimental condition seemed implausible. Therefore, 18 studies with a total of 865 participants were included in the present analyses.36–42,44–54 The participants included frail elderly and people with ankle fracture, anklylosing spondylitis, oral submucous fibrosis, post radiation therapy to the breast, post-radiation therapy to the jaw, progressive systemic sclerosis, total knee replacement, arthritis, Dupuytren’s contractures, shoulder adhesive capsulitis/frozen shoulder, hallux limitus, wrist fracture and burns.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Supported by the University of Sydney and National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia.

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

    View full text