Designing ergonomic interventions for EMS workers: Concept generation of patient-handling devices
Introduction
Musculoskeletal injuries account for over half of the injuries suffered by firefighters in the United States (US). Many of these injuries occur while performing non-fire emergency tasks, such as emergency medical services (EMS) (Karter and Molis, 2006). This is not unexpected given that today, the majority of fire department calls in the US are for EMS rather than fire suppression. In 2005, 62% of fire department calls were for medical aid, with the numbers increasing steadily over time from about 6 million EMS calls in 1986 to over 14 million in 2005 (National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), 2006). The same injury profile holds true for EMS workers in the private sector, such as paramedics working for ambulance companies where in 2004, of the 5170 injuries reported, 3410 (67%) were sprain/strain injuries (United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2006a). These injuries are typically due to overexertion and affect primarily the back (Maguire et al., 2005; United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2006b; Walton et al., 2003). The consequence of these injuries is high worker compensation costs (Theberge et al., 2006; Walton et al., 2003), permanent disability, and premature retirement (Conrad et al., 1994).
Although EMS workers do a variety of tasks, the most frequently performed strenuous job tasks entail either lifting and carrying patients down the stairs or performing lateral transfers of patients at the emergency scene and at the hospital (Conrad et al., 2000). Very few researchers have described the physical demands associated specifically with EMS worker job tasks (Doormaal et al., 1995; Furber et al., 1997; Lavender et al., 2000a, Lavender et al., 2000b; Massad et al., 2000).
In contrast, there is a large body of research addressing the ergonomic risks associated with patient handling among health care workers, almost all of which has been conducted on nursing personnel (see reviews by Bos et al., 2006; Hignett, 2003; Waters et al., 2006). Like EMS workers, nursing personnel in settings such as hospitals, nursing homes, and home health care perform patient transfers from a bed to a stretcher or gurney and seated transfers, such as from a bed to a chair (Lloyd and Baptiste, 2006; McGill and Kavcic, 2005; Nelson et al., 2003a; Parsons et al., 2006). Unlike other healthcare workers, EMS workers must often transport patients down the stairs. Further, mechanical lifts or hoists (Evanoff et al., 2003; Parsons et al., 2006), patient lift teams, or adjustable beds (Trinkoff et al., 2003) used in institutional healthcare settings are not options for EMS workers. There are several unique aspects of patient handling during the provision of EMS that preclude a ready, direct application of these types of devices or administrative controls used in more controlled environments. EMS workers must function with a limited number of personnel in uncontrolled conditions such as tight, confined spaces and in inclement weather. They require portable patient-handling devices of a size and weight that can easily and quickly be brought to the emergency scene. Affordability is an issue, especially in volunteer fire departments with limited equipment budgets. Given these considerations, compact and affordable patient-handling devices, such as transfer boards and gait belts used in the healthcare setting, are two options that could conceivably be adapted for EMS use.
This study was guided by a theoretical framework that we developed a number of years ago using focus groups of firefighter/paramedics to elicit their perceptions about the factors that they thought contributed to their musculoskeletal injuries (Conrad et al., 1994). The model posits that situational factors (e.g., the EMS scene such as a confined space, presence of stairs, the patient's medical condition and physical characteristics, the EMS job task), worker factors (e.g., firefighter/paramedic EMS experience and the number of personnel available), and workplace factors (e.g., the EMS patient-handling devices) influence risk of musculoskeletal injury to firefighter/paramedics.
The purpose of this qualitative study was to generate initial design ideas for EMS patient-handling devices that were framed within the contextual reality of the end user firefighter/paramedics. This study was the initial phase of a multi-phase mixed methods (Creswell, 2003) research study aimed at creating ergonomic solutions for EMS patient-handling tasks that reduce biomechanical loads and that are viewed by the end users as worthy alternatives to current approaches. More specifically, the information collected in this study was subsequently applied in the following research phases where lab prototype devices were built and biomechanically tested (Lavender et al., 2007a, Lavender et al., 2007b, Lavender et al., 2007c). This study builds upon our earlier research that defined and quantified the postural and biomechanical risks related to EMS patient-handling tasks (Conrad et al., 2000; Lavender et al., 2000a, Lavender et al., 2000b).
Section snippets
Research design
This was a qualitative descriptive study using focus groups with content analysis as the analytic approach. As described by Sandelowski (2000), a qualitative descriptive design is a method of choice when straight descriptions of phenomena are desired. The qualitative descriptive study is not highly interpretive but rather “entails the presentation of the facts of the case in everyday language” (Sandelowski, 2000, p. 336). This qualitative approach was appropriate for this study given that our
End user acceptance criteria for the new devices
The ideas for new devices often included some evaluative comments beyond the goal of making the firefighter/paramedic's job safer and easier while not adversely impacting the patient. Content analysis of “the design features of the ideal device” quickly revealed a set of commonly held end user acceptance criteria that if attained would make the device desirable and likely to be adopted by EMS workers. The criteria were echoed across groups and were continually referred back to when evaluating
End user acceptance criteria
The end user acceptance criteria, except for affordability, reflect an emphasis on ease of use. The first criterion arises from the fire chief's need to consider cost as well as utility when evaluating a firefighter/paramedic's request to purchase equipment. Participants at all levels frequently complained that items marketed to the fire service are priced significantly higher than similar items marketed to other industries, in part perhaps due to manufacturers’ liability concerns when
Conclusion
Together, firefighter/paramedics, an industrial designer, and university researchers developed a worthy set of initial design ideas for EMS patient-handling devices. The participants articulated clear end user acceptance criteria that should be considered when designing devices if we are to increase the likelihood of their future adoption. The design ideas generated in this focus group study were further developed in subsequent phases of a mixed methods research study.
Acknowledgments
This publication was supported by R01 OH 007490 from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NIOSH. We wish to thank the fire chiefs and firefighter/paramedics from Mutual Aid Box Alarm System (M.A.B.A.S.) Division III and the Intergovernmental Risk Management Agency (IRMA) for their assistance. We would also like to thank two of our colleagues and the
References (39)
- et al.
Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: a review based on current literature and designers’ feedback
Appl. Ergon.
(2002) - et al.
Patient handling with and without slings: an analysis of the risk of injury to the lumbar spine
Appl. Ergon.
(2000) - et al.
Prevention of back injuries in healthcare workers
Int. J. Ind. Ergon.
(1994) - et al.
Pushing and pulling carts and two-wheeled hand trucks
Int. J. Ind. Ergon.
(2005) - et al.
Biomechanical analyses of paramedics simulating frequently performed strenuous work tasks
Appl. Ergon.
(2000) - et al.
Postural analysis of paramedics simulating frequently performed strenuous work tasks
Appl. Ergon.
(2000) - et al.
Designing ergonomic interventions for EMS workers—part I: transporting patients down the stairs
Appl. Ergon.
(2007) - et al.
Designing ergonomic interventions for emergency medical service workers—part III: bed to stairchair transfers
Appl. Ergon.
(2007) - et al.
Designing ergonomic interventions for EMS workers—part II: lateral transfers
Appl. Ergon.
(2007) - et al.
Negotiating participation: understanding the “how” in an ergonomic change team
Appl. Ergon.
(2006)
Biomechanical evaluation of assistive devices for transferring residents
Appl. Ergon.
Friction-reducing devices for lateral patient transfers: a clinical evaluation
AAOHN J.
The effects of occupational interventions on reduction of musculoskeletal symptoms in the nursing profession
Ergonomics
Musculoskeletal injuries in the fire service: views from a focus group study
AAOHN J.
Initiating an ergonomic analysis: a process for jobs with highly variable tasks
AAOHN J.
Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research
Physical workload of ambulance assistants
Ergonomics
Reduction in injury rates in nursing personnel through introduction of mechanical lifts in the workplace
Am. J. Ind. Med.
Injuries to ambulance officers caused by patient handling tasks
J. Occup. Health Saf. Aust. N. Z.
Cited by (33)
Ergonomic assessment of musculoskeletal risk among a sample of Portuguese emergency medical technicians
2021, International Journal of Industrial ErgonomicsCitation Excerpt :These tasks lead to the frequent adoption of inappropriate postures at the trunk level, for example, forward flexion, side bending and twisting (Jaworek et al., 2010) being associated with low back disorders (Daynard et al., 2001; Prairie and Corbeil, 2014; Rugelj, 2003). During medical care assistance in the field and patient handling tasks, ambulance technicians tend to continually adopt awkward postures, compromising their well-being so that they accommodate patients’ needs (Conrad et al., 2008). According to Larouche et al. (2019), even in favourable patient handling contexts, paramedics still execute several risky lifts; leading to frequent reports of musculoskeletal injuries among these professionals (Studnek et al., 2012).
An ergonomic assessment of using laterally-tilting operating room tables and friction reducing devices for patient lateral transfers
2020, Applied ErgonomicsCitation Excerpt :As for the latissimus dorsi muscle, one of its main functions are arm extension or medial rotation (Criswell, 2010), which are movements performed when pulling an object; this may indicate that a similar pulling exertion was required in both OR table angles, since the latissimus dorsi EMG activities were unaffected. Similar research (Lavender et al., 2007; Conrad et al., 2008) developed different ergonomic interventions to facilitate lateral patient transfer, which included: a bridgeboard to reduce the frictional force resisting the lateral sliding of the patient, the use of rods along each side of the patient to facilitate the grasping and handling of the bedsheet, and a single rod that, when rolled in the bedsheet, resulted in the task being changed from a lifting task to a pulling task. They found that erector spinae EMG activity decreased with the use of the bridgeboard and the single rod both individually and together.
Paramedic equipment bags: How their position during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) affect paramedic ergonomics and performance
2020, Applied ErgonomicsCitation Excerpt :Furthermore, they did not investigate CPR quality, work efficiency or physiological effort. Several studies have suggested ergonomics interventions (Karsh et al., 2001) to reduce the biomechanical loads and risk of injury during patient transfer (e.g., Armstrong et al., 2017; Lavender et al., 2007; Conrad et al., 2008; Prairie et al., 2016; Lad et al., 2018). Others have investigated the physiological and biomechanical loads acting on paramedics’ bodies while conducting chest compressions during CPR (Dainty and Gregory, 2017; Tsou et al., 2009, 2014; Heidenreich et al., 2006).
Overall risk index for patient transfers in total assistance mode executed by emergency medical technician-paramedics in real work situations
2019, Applied ErgonomicsCitation Excerpt :To lower the prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) among workers, some prehospital urgent care companies have opted to purchase mechanized stretchers and loading systems, which considerably reduce the number of lifts EMT-Ps have to make (Armstrong et al., 2017; Fischer et al., 2017). Nevertheless, patient transfers continue to be regular, demanding, variable activities at risk for MSDs, particularly when EMT-Ps must carry the patient's entire weight (transfers in total assistance mode) (Conrad et al., 2008; Dropkin et al., 2015; Fischer et al., 2017; Lavender et al., 2000a). Laboratory simulations have made it possible to quantify awkward postures, primarily related to sagittal flexion.
Paramedics' working strategies while loading a stretcher into an ambulance
2017, Applied ErgonomicsCitation Excerpt :Once the call has been received, a series of activities is triggered, with the purpose of transporting the patient from the call location to a hospital. Prehospital interventions are carried out in teams of two paramedics and require a high degree of physical and mental effort under varying environmental conditions (Conrad et al., 2008; Corbeil and Prairie, 2012; Gauthier, 2006; Prairie and Corbeil, 2014). During these interventions, paramedics provide emergency care and, in 83% of situations, evacuate the patient on a stretcher (Prairie et al., 2016).