Elsevier

Annals of Emergency Medicine

Volume 60, Issue 3, September 2012, Pages 251-259
Annals of Emergency Medicine

Pediatrics/original research
Rapid Sequence Intubation for Pediatric Emergency Patients: Higher Frequency of Failed Attempts and Adverse Effects Found by Video Review

Presented as a poster at the Pediatric Academic Societies annual meeting, May 2011, Denver, CO.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.02.013Get rights and content

Study objective

Using video review, we seek to determine the frequencies of first-attempt success and adverse effects during rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in a large, tertiary care, pediatric emergency department (ED).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of children undergoing RSI in the ED of a pediatric institution. Data were collected from preexisting video and written records of care provided. The primary outcome was successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt at laryngoscopy. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of any adverse effect during RSI, including episodes of physiologic deterioration. We collected time data from the RSI process by using video review. We explored the association between physician type and first-attempt success.

Results

We obtained complete records for 114 of 123 (93%) children who underwent RSI in the ED during 12 months. Median age was 2.4 years, and 89 (78%) were medical resuscitations. Of the 114 subjects, 59 (52%) were tracheally intubated on the first attempt. Seventy subjects (61%) had 1 or more adverse effects during RSI; 38 (33%) experienced oxyhemoglobin desaturation and 2 required cardiopulmonary resuscitation after physiologic deterioration. Fewer adverse effects were documented in the written records than were observed on video review. The median time from induction through final endotracheal tube placement was 3 minutes. After adjusting for patient characteristics and illness severity, attending-level providers were 10 times more likely to be successful on the first attempt than all trainees combined.

Conclusion

Video review of RSI revealed that first-attempt failure and adverse effects were much more common than previously reported for children in an ED.

Introduction

Rapid sequence intubation (RSI) is the standard for definitive airway management in emergency medicine.1, 2, 3, 4 The administration, in rapid succession, of sedative and neuromuscular-blocking medications is designed to optimize conditions for emergency intubation while limiting the risk of patient harm. RSI is reported to be a highly successful and safe procedure among adult emergency department (ED) patients,1, 2, 4 with one multicenter study reporting success on the first attempt for 85% of these patients.2 Children are thought to be at greater risk during emergency intubation, for both failed attempts and adverse effects.1 To our knowledge, there are few studies that report pediatric-specific data for RSI in an ED, all of which have important limitations.3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

In a report from the National Emergency Airway Registry, 156 children (18 years or younger) had tracheal intubation attempted in an ED setting, including 1 pediatric ED. For the 127 children who underwent RSI, 78% were tracheally intubated on the first attempt and 16% had at least 1 adverse effect (including 2% with desaturation, 7% with mainstem intubation, and 4% with esophageal intubation).3 In a separate retrospective study of 143 children tracheally intubated in a pediatric ED, bradycardia was reported in 4% of patients and hypoxemia in 22%.5 These studies likely underreport the frequency of both first-attempt failure and adverse effects because of voluntary self-reporting or the limitations of chart review. Our clinical experience and quality assurance efforts suggested that failed first attempts and adverse effects occur more commonly than reported for pediatric emergency patients undergoing RSI.

RSI is among the most common critical procedures performed for pediatric emergency patients and should be a high priority for quality assurance efforts.9, 10, 11 First-attempt success is used as a measure of the quality of the RSI process and the ease of tracheal intubation.2, 3 The failure of early attempts at tracheal intubation may deplete a patient's oxygen reserve, leading to physiologic deterioration of an already critically ill or injured child. An accurate description of the frequency of first-attempt success and adverse effects of RSI for children in an ED setting will allow a better risk assessment and inform targeted interventions to reduce that risk.

The goal of our study was to accurately and thoroughly describe the process, success, and safety of RSI for patients in a busy pediatric ED. Using video review, we specifically sought to determine the frequencies of first-attempt success and adverse effects for patients undergoing RSI in a pediatric ED.

Section snippets

Study Design

We performed a retrospective, observational study, using video review as the primary method of data collection. Our institutional review board approved our protocol before study commencement.

Setting

We conducted our study in the ED of a tertiary care children's hospital, which is the major regional provider of emergency care to children and has approximately 90,000 annual visits. In this ED, critically ill or injured patients are managed in one of 4 resuscitation bays by a designated team, which

Characteristics of Study Subjects

We reviewed the medical records of 2,999 patients who were managed in the ED resuscitation area during the 12-month study period. We identified 145 patients who underwent intubation, 123 of whom met our definition of RSI (4% of all patients reviewed) and made up our study sample. Of these 123 patients, 122 were identified through the initial chart review and 1 from a list of pediatric ICU admissions. We obtained videos for 114 of 123 subjects (93%); 9 videos were unavailable for review because

Limitations

Our study has several limitations. First, the investigators who reviewed videos for data collection were not blinded to the study's objectives, which could have biased our determination of adverse effects especially. However, we used standard definitions from the relevant literature, and both measures of interreviewer agreement were high for adverse effects. Second, we relied on previously recorded videos from the resuscitation area and could not confirm clinical findings with direct

Discussion

RSI is a critical and often lifesaving procedure that, although infrequently performed in the pediatric ED, all emergency physicians must be able to perform successfully and safely. To our knowledge, we present data from the first detailed, video-based evaluation of pediatric RSI in the ED. For patients in a pediatric ED, we found a higher frequency of both failed first attempts and adverse effects than previously reported in association with RSI. Two children had physiologic deterioration

References (28)

  • M.J. Sagarin et al.

    Rapid sequence intubation for pediatric emergency airway management

    Pediatr Emerg Care

    (2002)
  • R. Fastle et al.

    Pediatric rapid sequence intubation: incidence of reflex bradycardia and effects of pretreatment with atropine

    Pediatr Emerg Care

    (2004)
  • E. Marvez-Valls et al.

    Protocol for rapid sequence intubation in pediatric patients—a four-year study

    Med Sci Monit

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    Provide feedback on this article at the journal's Web site, www.annemergmed.com.

    A podcast for this article is available at www.annemergmed.com.

    Funding and support: By Annals policy, all authors are required to disclose any and all commercial, financial, and other relationships in any way related to the subject of this article as per ICMJE conflict of interest guidelines (see www.icmje.org). This project was supported by an Institutional Clinical and Translational Science Award, NIH/NCRR grant number 5UL1RR026314. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the NIH.

    Please see page 252 for the Editor's Capsule Summary of this article.

    Supervising editor: Steven M. Green, MD

    Author contributions: BK, AR, GG, and MM conceived the study. BK, AR, and MM were responsible for supervising all study procedures and collected all study data. BK was primarily responsible for data processing and management. BK and AR were responsible for coordinating statistical support and drafted the article. GG and LEN contributed to the plan of analysis. LEN assisted in analysis of the data. All authors reviewed and approved the final article. BK takes responsibility for the paper as a whole.

    Publication date: Available online March 15, 2012.

    View full text