Survey of astronaut opinions on medical crewmembers for a mission to Mars
Introduction
A human mission to Mars will be an extraordinary undertaking demanding preparation to a level beyond that currently used for missions to low earth orbit. Exploration class missions returning to the Moon or going to Mars are the current focus for NASA's future and the next big step in human space exploration.
The health risks to the crew will be dependent on mission architecture but are not entirely predictable. For Mars missions, medical autonomy will play a critical role should a health problem occur, since returning to Earth is not a viable option. Real-time telemedicine will be limited due to round-trip signal delays of up to 45 min, depending on the distance from the Earth, and there may be periods when communication is not possible.
The inclusion of appropriately trained medical officers in the crew is critical to achieve medical autonomy. The number and training of medical personnel for a Mars mission is yet to be determined, and both initial training and skill maintenance will present unique challenges as crews prepare for missions that may last up to three years. Exploration missions will include specific training in the skills required to operate spacecraft systems, perform spacecraft rendezvous, planetary EVA, and operate habitat systems. Astronauts will also require more generic exploration skills such as first aid, navigation, and photography, as well as expeditionary behavioral skills. Wilderness training and terrestrial analogs are currently being employed to train individuals in leadership, teamwork, and survival skills in addition to self-care and self-management skills. The combination of generic and mission-specific exploration training will give astronauts the necessary skills to optimize mission success. Future crew medical officers (CMOs) will require additional medical training to prevent, diagnose, and treat illness and injury to mitigate the health risks associated with long-duration exploration missions.
Several authors have discussed the need for a physician to provide medical care on spacecraft [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. While the medical requirements for a mission to Mars will ultimately be developed in consultation with a spectrum of specialists, the perspective of astronauts on the desired crew skill sets to optimize mission success is important.
Exploration missions beyond low earth orbit will be associated with a number of potential risks to crew health, safety, and mission success. Determination of the fact that the level of risk is acceptable will be based on a wide range of risk management strategies to mitigate risks associated with vehicle design, mission architecture, systems operation, and human performance in extreme, harsh, isolated environments. As in the case of the Apollo lunar missions, exploration astronauts will play a critical role in assisting engineers, mission planners, and crew training teams in developing the hardware, procedures, and training requirements for generic and mission-specific exploration training. Similarly, the astronaut's perspective on the requirements for exploration clinical capability is of considerable importance, since they are all potential patients accepting risks to their health in unpredictable and new environments, and so their opinions should be integrated with recommendations of other expert groups.
Historically, there has been considerable discussion about the need for physicians on exploration missions and the type of medical training required [3], [6], [8]. There is a lack of consensus on the level of medical care required for exploration missions. While the predominant opinion is that physician-astronauts should be part of an exploration crew, Zubrin [9] has taken the position that having a dedicated physician on a mission to Mars is “cumbersome” and “unnecessary”. On the other hand, Hamilton [3] was one of the first to consider the need for a physician as a primary medical provider in a spacecraft crew and stated that “where man goes, his illness will follow, and so must physicians.”
Section snippets
Methods
A web-based, self-administered, confidential questionnaire was made available to the current astronaut corps online using a web link that was included in an e-mail explaining the purpose of the survey. Participation in the survey was voluntary. The survey was composed of 43 questions, primarily in Likert-type format. Some of the questions provided a range of alternative answers that the astronauts could choose from. Open-ended comments were also accepted. This survey was adapted from an
Results
Sixty-three completed surveys were received representing 60.6% (63/104) of the active duty astronaut corps at the time of the study. The most common age range was 41–45 (41.3%, ), while 84.1% of the respondents were male, and 12.7% confirmed that they were physicians (MD or equivalent). Of the respondents, 65.1% have worked in the military, 87.3% have had pilot experience, 57.1% have flown in space, and 65.1% reported having space analog experience.
Discussion
The majority of the astronauts who completed this survey felt that a physician should be a member of the crew on a mission to Mars (, 79.4%). These results are consistent with data from a subsequent survey of the astronaut office to determine the desired career backgrounds for exploration astronauts. In the latter survey 86% (39/45) of the responses selected physicians as a desirable career background for exploration astronauts (Williams, unpublished data). In this study, the perceived need
Conclusions
There is a perceived need amongst the majority of the astronauts surveyed for clinical skills in the crew participating in a mission to Mars. Almost 80% of the astronauts surveyed clearly support the inclusion of a physician, and the majority felt that at least one additional CMO, who may be a non-physician, should also be included. While all specialties mentioned were considered of variable importance in terms of background training essential for a physician crewmember, most felt that
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Institutional Review Boards (Johnson Space Center and Kennedy Space Center) for providing expedient approval, and to the Canadian Space Agency for their sponsorship and support for the project.
References (19)
- et al.
Medical concerns for exploration-class missions
Acta Astronautica
(1993) Human missions to Mars: new psychological challenges and research issues
Acta Astronautica
(2004)- et al.
Space analog studies in Antarctica
Acta Astronautica
(1999) - M.R. Campbell, Surgical care during long duration spaceflight, in: Presented at the Aerospace Medical Association 71st...
Medical issues for a mission to mars
Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine
(1999)Space medicine branch report: what kind of physicians for space?
Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine
(1987)- R.P. Janney, Medical training issues and skill mix for exploration missions, in: Presented at the Aerospace Medical...
Psychosocial training for physicians on board the space station
Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine
(1988)Letter to the Editor: the space station physician selection controversy
Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine
(1989)
Cited by (14)
Fundamentals of Anesthesiology for Spaceflight
2016, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular AnesthesiaCitation Excerpt :With electronic transmissions limited by the speed of light, telemedicine, telementoring, and telesurgery all become impractical options. The exact crew composition has not been decided, but could be limited to a crew medical officer who is not necessarily a physician.13 An astronaut survey argued against this and recommended having a medical doctor with broad medical skills on board.13
Features of adaptive training algorithms for improved complex skill acquisition
2024, Frontiers in Virtual RealityAdequacy of in-mission training to treat tibial shaft fractures in mars analogue testing
2023, Scientific ReportsAn Easy-To-Use External Fixator for All Hostile Environments, from Space to War Medicine: Is It Meant for Everyone’s Hands?
2023, Journal of Clinical Medicine