Elsevier

Neurologic Clinics

Volume 14, Issue 2, 1 May 1996, Pages 435-450
Neurologic Clinics

EPIDEMIOLOGIC ASPECTS OF BRAIN INJURY

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0733-8619(05)70266-8Get rights and content

Section snippets

METHODOLOGIC ISSUES IN THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF BRAIN INJURY RESEARCH

Although clinical aspects of brain injury have been studied widely, population-based assessments of brain injury are relatively new, and methodologies have not been standardized. A central issue in comparing various reports is that the phrase brain injury often has been used synonymously with head injury. For research purposes, however, the former should be considered a subset of the latter. Many injuries classified as head injury do not have associated neurologic involvement. Another

MORTALITY AND CASE FATALITY RATES

About 6.5% of deaths in the United States were attributed to injury causes in 1992.5 Assuming that 40% of these deaths were attributable to brain injury,27 there were approximately 56,000 brain injury deaths—an overall brain injury–associated death rate of about 22 per 100,000 per year. This rate has remained stable over the last 2 decades (D.M. Sosin, personal communication, April 1994).

In-hospital case fatality rates are one measure of severity for patient groups with the diagnosis of brain

HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS

The number of individuals admitted annually to hospitals for brain injury in the United States is not known, nor is it known for most other countries for which admission statistics are kept. The reason is similar to that for problems with using death certificate diagnoses: Brain injury may not have been the principal admission diagnosis. Hence, brain injury may be listed only after other more severe injuries. General estimates of brain injury hospital admissions may be derived using two

INCIDENCE STUDIES

Incidence rates of brain injury in the United States in the 1970s and 1980s have been estimated variously to be between 160 and 375 per 100,000 per year (Fig. 3).2, 14, 17, 23, 25, 28, 52 Although differences in brain injury incidence rates between rural and urban areas4 and between various ethnic groups are suggested, substantive methodologic differences between studies make comparisons difficult. The average US incidence rate of fatal and nonfatal hospitalized brain injury is about 237 per

EXTERNAL CAUSES OF BRAIN INJURY

Worldwide, the most frequent exposure associated with both fatal and nonfatal brain injury is transport-related causes.2, 14, 16, 17, 18, 23, 25, 28, 31, 52 This category includes accidents involving automobiles, trucks, bicycles, motorcycles, aircraft, watercraft, road farm equipment, and pedestrians struck by vehicles. The incidence of transport-related brain injury does not vary significantly among most studies. Significant differences with respect to specific subcauses are seen, however.

Age and Gender

The 15- to 24-year-old age group is at highest risk for brain injury. Younger persons, particularly those under age five, are at moderately high risk. Figure 4 illustrates age-specific brain injury incidence rates for a composite of four studies2, 17, 23, 52 and three additional individual studies.14, 25, 28 Individuals in their midlife years show consistently low rates, but these rates rise again after about age 60. The pattern reflects increased exposure in young adults to motor vehicle

PREDICTION OF OUTCOME

The issue of accurate prediction of outcome following brain injury has been addressed by many investigators. No single set of indicators has been demonstrated uniformly to be accurate in predicting outcome (Table 2). Thatcher et al47 found that electroencephalography and the GCS scores were excellent predictors of outcome if only the dichotomous outcomes of good recovery or dead were considered. Wa¨rme et al51 found that GCS motor score, systemic hypotension, and duration of hyperventilation

THE PUBLIC HEALTH IMPACT OF BRAIN INJURY PREVENTION

The worldwide incidence of brain injury may be as high as 500 million per year.2, 16 Only recently has the focus relevant to brain injury changed from clinical intervention to prevention. There is, however, a lack of reliable data to estimate the contribution of brain injury to the world's health burden so that reasonable priorities and strategies can be developed for primary and secondary prevention. A conceptual model of phases associated with primary, secondary, and tertiary brain injury

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge with appreciation Swarup Sarkar, MD, and Bonnie Blander, BA, for their library research.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (54)

  • A. Butchart et al.

    Epidemiology of non-fatal injuries due to external causes in Johannesburg—Soweto. Part II: Incidence and determinants

    South African Medical Journal

    (1991)
  • Centers for Disease Control

    National Committee for Injury Prevention and Control. Injury prevention: Meeting the challenge: The National Committee for Injury Prevention and Control

    Am J Prev Med

    (1989)
  • S.C. Choi et al.

    Enhanced specificity of prognosis in severe head injury

    J Neurosurg

    (1988)
  • J.G. Collins

    Types of injuries by selected characteristics: United States, 1985–1987

    Vital Health Stat 10

    (1990)
  • Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities

    The International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD9CM)

    (1978)
  • Committee on Trauma Research

    Commission of Life Sciences, National Research Council and the Institute of Medicine Washington

    (1985)
  • K.D. Cooper et al.

    The epidemiology of head injury in the Bronx

    Neuroepidemiology

    (1983)
  • R. Feachem et al.
  • D. Fife

    Head injury with and without hospital admission: Comparisons of incidence and short term disability

    Am J Public Health

    (1987)
  • D. Fife et al.

    Incidence and outcome of hospital-treated head injury in Rhode Island

    Am J Public Health

    (1986)
  • R.F. Frankowski et al.

    Epidemiological and descriptive studies. Part I: The descriptive epidemiology of head trauma in the United States

  • C.J. Gerber et al.

    A simple scoring system for accurate prediction of outcome within four days of a subarachnoid haemorrhage

    Acta Neurochir

    (1993)
  • J.A. Gulaid et al.

    Differences in death rates due to injury among Blacks and Whites, 1984

    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep

    (1988)
  • HaddonW.

    Advances in the epidemiology of injuries as a basis for public policy

    Public Health Rep

    (1980)
  • Insurance Institute for Highway Safety

    State Law Facts 1994

    (1994)
  • J. Jagger et al.

    Epidemiologic features of head injury in a predominantly rural population

    J Trauma

    (1984)
  • B. Jennett

    Diagnosis and management of head trauma

    J Neurotrauma

    (1991)
  • Cited by (0)

    Address reprint requests to Jess F. Kraus, MPH, PhD, Department of Epidemiology, Southern California Injury Prevention Research Center, School of Public Health, 76–078 CHS, University of California Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1772

    Work on this article was supported by the Southern California Injury Prevention Research Center, funded by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    *

    From the Department of Epidemiology, Southern California Injury Prevention Research Center, School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

    View full text