Elsevier

Burns

Volume 24, Issue 6, September 1998, Pages 552-558
Burns

Scientific and clinical paper
Non-accidental burns in children

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-4179(98)00062-XGet rights and content

Abstract

A retrospective review of five hundred and seven consecutive admissions to a state-wide paediatric burns unit over a three year period was made to assess the characteristics of the burn injuries and to see which, if any, characteristics would help to distinguish accidental burns from burns which were due to abuse or neglect. In 86% of admissions (the ‘accident group’) it was considered that the injury was accidental, with no evidence of deliberate injury or gross neglect. Eight percent of admissions (the ‘abuse/neglect group’) were referred to the State Department of Community Services for abuse or neglect resulting in the Department becoming involved in the family's management. In six percent of cases (the ‘concern group’) the Unit had concerns that the family's emotional or social situation was a significant factor in the child's injury, or made further injury more likely, and discussed the family's situation with the Department, but formal intervention was not undertaken by the Department. There were no differences between the groups in age or mortality. Children in the ‘abuse/neglect’ and the ‘concern’ groups were more likely to require skin grafting and treatment in the intensive care unit. They were more likely to come from single parent families and were more likely to have burns involving both hands or both legs. There were few other distinguishing factors. The incidence of prior notification for abuse and neglect was four percent for the ‘accident’ group, 14% for the ‘concern’ group and 46% for the ‘abuse/neglect’ group. This is considerably higher in the ‘concern’ and ‘abuse/neglect’ groups than the annual state incidence of 1.73% for abuse and neglect notifications. While the clinical features of a burn may often not be helpful in reaching a diagnosis of abuse or neglect as a cause of the burn, it appears that many children who have non-accidental burns have also had prior notifications for other types of abuse or neglect.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (90)

  • Psychodermatology

    2021, Pediatric Dermatology
  • Incidence and characteristics of non-accidental burns in children: A systematic review

    2020, Burns
    Citation Excerpt :

    A difference in gender distribution was found in one study [25], more girls suffered from intentional burns than boys did. The other 7 studies showed no difference in gender [2,12,14,18,21,23,24]. Mortality is reported and analyzed in five studies, of which in four the mortality rate was not significantly different between intentional burns and accidental burns [12,21,23,25].

  • Emergency Care of Pediatric Burns

    2018, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    Emergency physicians are mandatory reporters and do not need to definitively diagnose abuse but rather to reasonable cause to suspect abuse. Obtaining collateral information from social workers is beneficial because previous child protective services involvement is documented in 15% to 90% of reported nonaccidental burn cases.19,26,42,73,74 If there is any suspicion of nonaccidental trauma, the child should be admitted so that collateral information can be obtained while the child is safe.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text