Predicting defibrillation success by ‘genetic’ programming in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest
Introduction
The current guidelines of advance life support prescribe immediate defibrillation after the onset of ventricular fibrillation (VF). With increasing duration of VF, the success of electrical defibrillation decreases [1]. However, in some patients with VF there might be a better chance of return of spontaneous circulation after a period of chest compression and ventilation before the defibrillation attempt [2]. Futile defibrillation attempts are in themselves detrimental, because tissue damage and post-resuscitation myocardial dysfunction may be caused by the shock itself and by the lack of tissue perfusion from chest compression during the shock period (analysis, charging, defibrillation and outcome evaluation) [3]. It is therefore important to know whether a defibrillation attempt will be successful.
The electrocardiogram (ECG) is a part of the current practice of advanced life support. Different algorithms and variables to analyze VF ECG signals and to predict success of defibrillation, including amplitude, frequency, bispectral analysis, amplitude spectrum area, wavelets, nonlinear dynamics, N(α) histograms and combinations of several of these parameters, have been studied [4].
There are essentially two kinds of predictive models: deterministic (mathematical models, empirical models, computer simulation models) and non-deterministic (models developed by genetic methods, neural network models, models based on chaos theory and soft logic theory), and each has its advantages and disadvantages [5]. In general, when deterministic modeling is used the models obtained are the result of strict mathematical rules or they are set in advance. In that case, the goal is merely to discover a set of numerical coefficients for a model whose form has been pre-specified. However, nowadays more and more processes and systems are modeled and optimized using non-deterministic approaches. This is due to the high degree of complexity of the systems, and consequently, the inability to study them successfully with conventional methods only. In non-deterministic modeling of systems, there are no precise, strict mathematical rules. For example, in ‘genetic’ programming (GP), no assumptions about the form, size and complexity of models are made in advance. They are left to stochastic, self-organized, intelligent and non-centralized evolutionary processes [6].
The aim of the study was to develop a model by GP to predict success of defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using features of VF ECG form time-domain, frequency-domain and nonlinear dynamics, which were shown previously to contain information to predict successful defibrillation.
Section snippets
Patients
Two hundred and three ECG recordings in 47 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurring between March 1998 and December 2000 were evaluated retrospectively. In all patients, cardiac aetiology was the immediate cause of cardiac arrest and VF was identified as the initial ECG rhythm. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation therapy were performed in the out-of-hospital setting by the staff of the medical emergency service and all patients were treated in accordance with 1998
Results
Two hundred and three (mean 4.3, median 4, range 1–16) defibrillations were administered in 47 (13 (27.6%) female) with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest due to VF. Mean age of the patients was 64.5±10.5 years. Seventy-nine (38.9%) defibrillations were successful. Characteristics of VF signal are shown in Table 1.
At the beginning the predictive model developed by GP included all four variables: TD, A, TE and H. TD was excluded during evolution of the model. The equation is presented in Fig. 2. The
Discussion
In this study of 203 defibrillations, the prediction power of a model developed by GP to predict successful defibrillation was studied. High positive and low negative likelihood ratios of the GP model indicate that the model may have a very substantial impact on clinical decision-making through a meaningful assessment of whether to administer defibrillation or not [14].
In the model developed by GP four variables from time-domain (TD and A), frequency-domain (TE) and nonlinear dynamics (H) were
References (21)
Clinical utility of likelihood ratios
Ann. Emerg. Med.
(1998)- et al.
Analysis of ventricular fibrillation ECG signal amplitude and frequency parameters as predictors of countershock success in humans
Chest
(1997) - et al.
Median frequency—a new parameter for predicting defibrillation success rate
Ann. Emerg. Med.
(1991) - et al.
Physiologic measurement of ventricular fibrillation ECG signal: estimating the duration of ventricular fibrillation
Ann. Emerg. Med.
(1993) - et al.
Ventricular fibrillation exhibits dynamical properties and self-similarity
Resuscitation
(2000) - et al.
Amplitude of ventricular fibrillation waveform and outcome after cardiac arrest
Ann. Inter. Med.
(1985) - et al.
Influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to defibrillation in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
(1999) - et al.
High-energy defibrillation increases the severity of postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction
Circulation
(1997) - et al.
Algorithms to analyze ventricular fibrillation signals
Curr. Opin. Crit. Care
(2001) - et al.
Using genetic programming to predict the macroporosity of woven cotton fabrics
Textil. Res. J.
(2002)
Cited by (37)
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Adult advanced life support
2021, ResuscitationPredicting defibrillation success in out-of-hospital cardiac arrested patients: Moving beyond feature design
2020, Artificial Intelligence in MedicineCitation Excerpt :However, by choosing the decision as in this study, this model would not be considered safe. The only model that outperforms the CNN model was suggested by Podbregar et al. [35]. Nonetheless, as we stated above there is a possibility of data leaking related to this study, and possibly unrealistically high performance.
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Section 3. Adult advanced life support.
2015, ResuscitationCitation Excerpt :Auto-PEEP (gas trapping) may be particularly high in asthmatics and may necessitate higher than usual energy levels for defibrillation.446 It is possible to predict, with varying reliability, the success of defibrillation from the fibrillation waveform.342,343,447–467 If optimal defibrillation waveforms and the optimal timing of shock delivery can be determined in prospective studies, it should be possible to prevent the delivery of unsuccessful high energy shocks and minimise myocardial injury.
Optimizing the timing of defibrillation: The role of ventricular fibrillation waveform analysis during cardiopulmonary resuscitation
2012, Critical Care ClinicsCitation Excerpt :In addition, cardiomyopathy, autonomic dysfunction, and differences in drug therapy make it probable that VF waveform analysis will never demonstrate perfect predictive ability. Because different measurements extract slightly different information from the VF waveform, it is likely that combinations of these measurements will provide superior discriminative ability.32,65,66 Neurauter and coworkers35 analyzed 770 ECG recordings of countershock parameters from 197 patients with CA.