Research reportDiagnostic conversion from depression to bipolar disorders: results of a long-term prospective study of hospital admissions
Introduction
The homogeneity and unity of manic-depressive disorders (Kraepelin, 1898) were disproved in the late 1960s by three monographs Angst, 1966, Perris, 1966, Winokur et al., 1969 and the distinction between bipolar disorder (BP) (Falret, 1851) and depression was re-introduced. Since then, a persistent problem has been the uncertain diagnosis of depressive disorder, since it is clear that the group of recurrent depressives includes hidden bipolar subjects whose depression may develop into hypomania or mania at any time. One consequence of this is the long time elapsing between the onset of depression and a diagnosis of BP. This period was more than 7.5 years in the retrospective study of Ghaemi et al. (1999) and 8 years in a national survey of the NDMDA (1993) in the United States. Underdiagnosis of minor bipolar syndromes is the rule.
Although there have been many reports on the rates of diagnostic changes from depression to bipolar disorder (reviewed by Angst, 1988), few of them have taken the length of follow-up into account. On the basis of four large studies Kinkelin, 1954, Marneros et al., 1991, Coryell et al., 1995, Angst and Preisig, 1995a, we estimated a mean diagnostic change rate of 1% per year of observation (Angst, 2000). Coryell et al. (1995), for instance, found 5.0% diagnostic changes from depression to hypomania and 5.2% to mania over 10 years of follow-up; 7.5% of bipolar II patients developed mania.
The rates recently reported by Goldberg et al. (2001) in a 15-year follow-up of 74 initially hospitalised patients were higher, with the diagnosis changing from depression to hypomania in 26% and from depression to mania in 19% of patients. Their survival analyses suggested a constant (linear) risk of diagnostic change.
This paper will not deal with the risk of depressive episodes switching into hypomania or mania, and will therefore not discuss the hypothesis that antidepressants are risk factors for such a switch (Goodwin and Jamison, 1990). Nor will it analyse the time-point of such switches within a depressive episode.
The goal of this paper is to specifically describe the risks of long-term diagnostic conversion from depression to bipolar disorder (bipolar I and bipolar II) as a function of time, and in relation to age of onset, number of depressive episodes, sex and family history for bipolar disorder. In contrast to earlier analyses of the course (Angst and Preisig, 1995a), this paper applies survival techniques for the description of the time course of diagnostic changes over lifetime, including 26 years of prospective follow-up.
Section snippets
Sample and assessments
The sample consists of 406 patients (186 unipolar and 220 bipolar depressive or manic) who were admitted to the University Psychiatric Hospital of Zurich between 1959 and 1963 with a diagnosis of mania or endogenous depression, endo-reactive depression, manic-depressive disorder or affective disorder with mood-congruent or mood-incongruent psychotic features (hallucinations or delusions) including schizo-affective disorder. Sixty-one percent of the patients met the criteria for psychosis at
Status at first episode
As stated earlier, the sample consists of consecutive hospital admissions for major depression or mania over 5 years. It includes both first admissions and re-admissions; hence, the data collected on a subject's first episode are in many cases retrospective: 118 of 406 (29.1%) patients were selected for study in their first episode, 288 cases in later episodes. During their first episode, 45 (11.1%) patients were not treated, 38 (9.4%) treated as outpatients, 270 (66.5%) treated as inpatients;
Discussion
A change in diagnosis from depression to bipolar disorders has practical clinical implications for the prognosis and choice of treatment, and it helps define homogenous subgroups of mood disorders for biological research purposes.
In this naturalistic study, patients were recruited at many different points of their illness; it was therefore inevitable that for most patients, some data were retrospective and per se less reliable than data on the prospectively assessed episodes. To our surprise,
References (42)
- et al.
Bipolar outcome in the course of depressive illness. Phenomenologic, familial, and pharmacologic predictors
J. Affect. Disord.
(1983) - et al.
Toward a re-definition of subthreshold bipolarity: epidemiology and proposed criteria for bipolar-II, minor bipolar disorders and hypomania
J. Affect. Disord.
(2003) Bipolar II depression in late life: prevalence and clinical features in 525 depressed outpatients
J. Affect. Disord.
(2001)- et al.
Refining the evaluation of bipolar II: beyond the strict SCID-CV guidelines for hypomania
J. Affect. Disord.
(2003) - et al.
Is bipolar disorder still underdiagnosed? Are antidepressants overutilized?
J. Affect. Disord.
(1999) - et al.
The effect of episodes on recurrence in affective disorder: a case register study
J. Affect. Disord.
(1999) - et al.
The course of major depressive disorder in adolescents: I. Recovery and risk of manic switching in a follow-up of psychotic and nonpsychotic subjects
J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psych.
(1993) - et al.
Criteria for the “soft” bipolar spectrum: treatment implications
Psychopharmacol. Bull.
(1987) - et al.
Switching from “unipolar” to bipolar II. An 11-year prospective study of clinical and temperamental predictors in 559 patients
Arch. Gen. Psychiatry
(1995) - et al.
Fréquence et aspects cliniques du trouble bipolaire II dans une étude multicentrique francaise: EPIDEP
Encéphale
(2001)