Predicting stuttering from linguistic factors for German speakers in two age groups

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0094-730X(03)00009-3Get rights and content

Abstract

Brown’s factors [J. Speech Disorders 10 (1945) 181] predict the likely loci of disfluency in English-speaking adults who stutter. A word is more likely to be stuttered for these speakers if it is a content word, starts with a consonant, is positioned at the beginning of a sentence, and if it is a long word. These same factors were examined in native German-speaking children and adults who stutter. Speech data of 15 German adults and 17 children were coded according to Brown’s factors. For the adult group, it was predicted that words starting with consonants would not lead to as much of an increase in disfluencies compared with English samples, because of cross-linguistic differences in syllable onset properties. It was predicted that stuttering would be more likely in later sentence positions in German because in German the verb is usually near the end of a sentence. There were no obvious reasons to expect differences on the two remaining factors, content words and word length. With children, it was hypothesised that Brown’s factors that specify level of linguistic difficulty would not be such a good predictor of stuttering rate. Specifically, it was predicted that the difference in stuttering rate between function and content words would be lower in children. For the adults both word type (content/function) and word length increased stuttering rate significantly, whereas changes in stuttering rate for the other two factors were non-significant. It was also found that when word difficulty (based on a combined measure of all factors) increased, stuttering rate rose. With children, only the word-length factor was significant, and stuttering rate was not governed to the same extent by overall word difficulty. Conclusions are drawn as to the effect of linguistic and motor influences on stuttering.

Educational objectives: The reader will learn about and be able to describe: (1) how linguistic factors affect stuttering rates in German; (2) the different patterns of adults and children who stutter and how language might influence this pattern; and (3) how to interpret these findings in light of a current theory of fluency failure.

Section snippets

Participants

Participants were all native speakers of German. All had been diagnosed as exhibiting stuttering behaviour. Of the 15 adults, 5 were female and 10 were male. Their ages ranged from 16 years 3 months to 47 years 1 month, with a mean age of 29 years 8 months. They were all voluntary participants. Recordings of 17 school-aged children (6 girls, 11 boys) were analysed. All of the children were attending a speech therapy centre in Bad Salzdetfurth. Their ages ranged from 7 years 4 months to 11 years

Results

Individual stuttering rates were calculated, by dividing the number of stuttered words by the total number of words (i.e., stuttered and non-stuttered). Stuttering rates for the individual word factors were calculated in the same way. Thus, for content word stuttering rate, for instance, the number of stuttered content words was divided by the total number of content words both stuttered and non-stuttered. For the adults stuttering rates over all words ranged from 1.95 to 39.30% with a mean of

Discussion

Overall, for the adults it was shown that increasing word difficulty was associated with an increase in disfluencies. As such linguistic complexity is a good predictor for stuttering in adulthood. When considering the comparison between adults and children in respect of Brown’s four factors (the factor “grammatical class” interpreted here as the function–content word distinction) the striking and counter-intuitive finding is that children stutter more on linguistically “easier” words. For

Acknowledgements

Peter Howell is supported by the Wellcome Trust. Grateful thanks to Dipl. Psychologist Horst M. Oertle from the speech therapy centre in Bad Salzdetfurth for help with the speech samples of German children who stutter.

References (40)

  • Bock, K., & Levelt, W. (1994). Grammatical encoding. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp....
  • S.F. Brown

    Stuttering with relation to word accent and word position

    Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology

    (1938)
  • S.F. Brown

    The loci of stutterings in the speech sequence

    Journal of Speech Disorders

    (1945)
  • C.M. Brown et al.

    Electrophysiological signatures of visual lexical processing: Open- and closed-class words

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (1999)
  • Hartmann, R. R. K., & Stork, F. C. (1972). Dictionary of language and linguistics. London: Applied Science...
  • Howell, P., & Au-Yeung, J. (2002). The EXPLAN theory of fluency control and the diagnosis of stuttering. In E. Fave...
  • P. Howell et al.

    Exchange of stuttering from function words to content words with age

    Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research

    (1999)
  • M. Jayaram

    Grammatical factors in stuttering

    Journal of the Indian Institute of Science of Science

    (1981)
  • Johnson, S. (1998). Exploring the German language. London: Arnold...
  • Kanerva, J. (1989). Focus and phrasing in cichewa. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, Palo Alto,...
  • Cited by (30)

    • Effect of phonological and morphological factors on speech disfluencies of Kannada speaking preschool children who stutter

      2019, Journal of Fluency Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, in CWS mixed findings are reported. While Alqhazo and Al-Dennawi (2018) report greater frequency of stuttering with an increase in word length in Jordanian school-age CWS, increased stuttering on shorter words was reported by Dworzynski et al. (2003) in German-speaking CWS. Further, few other studies revealed no significant effect of word length on the rate of stuttering, specifically in English speaking preschool CWS (Howell & Au-Yeung, 1995; Throneburg et al., 1994).

    • Altered effective connectivity and anomalous anatomy in the basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuit of stuttering speakers

      2010, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      One interpretation of this result is that the negative project for non-stuttering speakers indicates ordered timing and sequencing signals provided for the preSMA by the basal ganglia-thalamus, whereas the positive projection for stuttering speakers may indicate insufficient control signal and much unordered signal input from the basal ganglia-thalamus, thus resulting in uncontrolled hyperactivity in the preSMA (see Fig. 3). These results reflect stuttering speakers' difficulties (but not incapability) in the selection and sequencing of speech movements (e.g., Blomgren et al., 1998; Dworzynski et al., 2003; Howell and Au-Yeung, 1995; Melnick and Conture, 2000; Ning et al., 2007). In terms of output of the preSMA, our results showed no significant differences between stuttering and non-stuttering speakers.

    • A model of serial order problems in fluent, stuttered and agrammatic speech

      2007, Human Movement Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Activation rate buildup would be rapid for these words, but less rapid for those function words which have somewhat more complex linguistic properties. For instance, all personal pronouns are single syllables with CVC structure, whereas “around” is an adverb (also a function word), is bisyllabic and ends with a consonant cluster (see Dworzynski, Howell, & Natke, 2003; Howell & Au-Yeung, 2007; Howell, Au-Yeung, Yaruss, & Eldridge, 2006, who document phonetic differences between function and content words for various languages). The rapid buildup can be represented by a sharp slope on their activation function.

    • Linguistic stress, within-word position, and grammatical class in relation to early childhood stuttering

      2004, Journal of Fluency Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      There seems to be a developmental pattern in grammatical class and stuttering. With increasing age, there is an increase in content word stuttering and a decrease in function word stuttering (Au-Yeung, Howell, & Pilgrim, 1998; Bloodstein & Gantwerk, 1967; Bloodstein & Grossman, 1981; Dworzynski, Howell, & Natke, 2003; Howell, Au-Yeung, & Sackin, 1999; Rommel, 2001). It has been suggested that the relationship between stuttering events and stress is weaker in children (Bloodstein & Gantwerk, 1967; Howell et al., 1999) due to the fact that function words are less frequently stressed.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Co-corresponding author. Tel.: +44-20-7679-5365; fax: +44-20-7436-4276.

    View full text