Elsevier

Burns

Volume 7, Issue 4, March 1981, Pages 233-251
Burns

The los alfaques disaster: A boiling-liquid, expanding-vapour explosion

https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-4179(81)90104-2Get rights and content

Abstract

On 11 July 1978, a road tanker carrying liquefied, flammable gas ran into the Los Alfaques camping ground south of Tarragona on the east coast of Spain and exploded [what is called ‘a boiling-liquid, expanding-vapour explosion’ (BLEVE) resulted]. The road tanker was loaded with about 45 m3 of propene (propylene). For some unknown reason it ran into the ditch against the wall of the camping ground; where-upon the tank split; large quantities of propene were ejected into the surrounding area; were gasified. The cloud of gas; mixed with air; was ignited, causing a violent explosion.

For the first 12 hour, there was total chaos on the site of the disaster. The injured were removed in a completely unorganized fashion and without any triage. The number of ambulances was insufficient and long delays, about 3 hours, elapsed before the last victim was driven away. The burning tanker blocked the road, thus effectively dividing the injured into two groups one being taken northwards and the other southwards, there were hospitals with similar standards at comparable distances in both directions.

On the road to the north, the injured received adequate medical care, once they had reached either the cottage hospital at Amposta or the hospital at Tortosa. At this stage, the final destination of 58 severely burned patients was the Francisco Franco Hospital in Barcelona, which has a burn unit with 31 beds.

Eighty-two severely burned patients were taken south to the La Fe Hospital in Valencia, which has a burn unit with 14 beds. In most cases no medical steps of any importance were taken during the journey. Several of the injured developed severe shock on the journey and had no measurable blood pressure on arrival.

One hundred and two people died at the site of the explosion. Their identification—a very complicated task—was made more difficult by the efforts of unskilled helpers.

A comparative study of the group of 58 patients taken to Barcelona and the group of 82 patients taken to Valencia reveals the following facts. There is no significant difference between the two groups with regard to the patients' ages and the extent and depth of their burns. The only certain difference is that the patients taken to Barcelona received adequate medical treatment during the journey, unlike most of the patients taken to Valencia who received no medical treatment at all during the journey. The medical treatment given at the two burn units in Barcelona and Valencia is first-class and is, in all essentials, the same at both units. During the 4 days immediately following the disaster, the survival rate declined to 93 per cent for the patients taken to Barcelona and to 45 per cent for those taken to Valencia. The reason for the significantly greater mortality in the Valencia patients must be the unsatisfactory medical treatment given en route to the hospital. Twenty-seven of the 31 patients who died during the first few days at the La Fe Hospital in Valencia had deep burns covering ⩾90 per cent of the body surface. The remaining 4 deaths were also those of very severely burned patients.

A very large number of the victims were domiciled in France, Germany, Belgium and Holland. In the week immediately following the disaster, these patients were evacuated to their own countries. The evacuation took place as soon as possible and was carried out in an exemplary fashion.

A follow-up study of all the patients reveals that there was an insignificant difference in the survival rate between the Barcelona and the Valencia groups two months after the disaster. This must be interpreted as indicating that the patients were so seriously injured in the disaster that the more adequate treatment given at an early stage to the Barcelona group only extended the survival time by a week or so for a large number of patients. Taking into account the 102 who died at the site, the mortality 2 months after the disaster was about 85 per cent.

On some points our view differs from that of our Spanish colleagues. This refers to the psychological care of very severely burned patients whose lives, it was considered, could not be saved. We believe that, as far as possible (but considerately and truthfully), the questions asked by these patients and their relatives should be answered. The care of the relatives of the severely burned patients imposed too heavy a burden on the hospitals. No satisfactory arrangements had been made to provide waiting rooms and information desks at the hospitals. Communications with the mass media were not properly prepared and organized either. This led to misunderstandings and to a number of newspaper articles containing inaccurate and negative criticism of the way in which the clinics had managed the nursing and evacuation of some severely burned patients.

It must be pointed out that this was a very serious disaster which occurred in the countryside, where one cannot expect there to be in existence a disaster plan dimensioned for several hundred victims. If a similar disaster should occur in Sweden, on the west coast north of Gothenburg, for example, all the intensive-care units (6) at the hospitals within a radius of about 150 km from the site would be needed for severely burned patients. Furthermore, at least 4 surgical wards would be needed for the somewhat less severely burned patients. In addition, we would have to reckon that all the beds in Sweden's special intensive-care units for burn cases (20) would be occupied for several months to come.

References (0)

Cited by (49)

  • European Burns Association guidelines for the management of burn mass casualty incidents within a European response plan

    2023, Burns
    Citation Excerpt :

    The corresponding paucity of burn specialists makes their on-scene deployment likely to unduly lengthen the on-scene time, worsening trauma and overall casualty outcome. Conversely, even for severe burns in mass casualty situations, provided simple, early interventions including fluid resuscitation, burn outcome is not a matter of minutes but of days or hours at the earliest [50]. The latter statement does not conflict with the worldwide consensus that early burn wound excision is paramount for optimal burn care, even with still open discussions about what “early” actually refers to in the 24–72 h range [51,52].

  • Ahmedpur Sharqia oil tanker tragedy: Lessons learnt from one of the biggest road accidents in history

    2020, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
    Citation Excerpt :

    Hydrocarbon fuel tanker truck accidents are capable of causing huge catastrophic damage and loss of lives if not managed. The biggest ever road disasters in terms of death toll have nearly all been fuel tanker truck explosions (Khan and Abassi, 1999) and with an exception of the 1978 Las Aflaque disaster in Spain that cost 217 lives (Arturson, 1981), similar disasters have almost exclusively been in developing countries like the recent south Kivu tanker explosion in Congo (230 casualties) and Okibie tanker explosion in Nigeria (121 casualties). Major industrial disasters such as the Bhopal gas leak have been discussed voluminous times in literature (Amyotte et al., 2016; Broughton, 2005; Chouhan, 2005).

  • Management of severe thermal burns in the acute phase in adults and children

    2020, Anaesthesia Critical Care and Pain Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Severe burn injuries induce early hypovolaemic shock due to inflammation, capillary leak syndrome and alterations in the microcirculation [61]. The severity of this shock and the rapidity of its onset were first described in the 1930s and have been observed repeatedly ever since, including after mass casualty accidents, such as the Los Alfaques disaster in 1978 [62,63]. These observations were confirmed in animal models.

  • Human survival in volcanic eruptions: Thermal injuries in pyroclastic surges, their causes, prognosis and emergency management

    2017, Burns
    Citation Excerpt :

    In surges the radiant heat comes from the combined contribution of the individual hot particles in the enveloping hot cloud. Analogous situations arise nowadays in major industrial incidents caused by the ignition of flammable stored materials, such as liquid petroleum gas (LPG), in which the main hazard to humans from a fireball or flash fire is the flash burn received from the intense thermal radiation emitted [25,30,31]. In thermonuclear explosions fires and severe flash burns may occur, as was seen in the A-bomb attacks in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki where the waves of radiant heat formed at the moment of explosion lasted for less than a second [18] (although the wavelength from thermonuclear explosions is lower and less penetrating than that from fires of equivalent intensity).

  • Historical evolution of process safety and major-accident hazards prevention in Spain. Contribution of the pioneer Joaquim Casal

    2014, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries
    Citation Excerpt :

    A tanker truck loaded with liquefied propylene was leaking and a fire started followed by a BLEVE (Boiling Liquid Expanding Vapor Explosion). There were 217 fatalities and 200 people were severely burned (Arturson, 1981; Mans, 1985). A particular case of natural gas disaster in transport was the one of Tivissa, one of the most studied cases in Catalonia (Spain).

  • Applying HAZAN methodology to hazmat transportation risk assessment

    2012, Process Safety and Environmental Protection
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text