Elsevier

Resuscitation

Volume 31, Issue 1, February 1996, Pages 39-44
Resuscitation

Clinical paper
Automatic external defibrillators in the hospital as well?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9572(95)00914-0Get rights and content

Abstract

When a cardiac arrest occurs in a non-intensive area of the hospital, the emergency response is not always adequate from the point of view of timeliness and technical quality. The aims of this study were to evaluate an experimental programme to improve the CPR skills of staff operating in non-intensive areas of our general hospital and to test the usefulness of placing automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) within these areas. In the experimental phase, two AEDs were placed in 2 non-intensive wards of our hospital for 8 months. The staff of these wards received specific training in CPR and early defibrillation (CPR-D). The devices were used in 19 cases: for defibrillation in four cases of ventricular fibrillation (VF) (three patients were discharged alive from hospital), and for monitoring three supraventricular arrhythmias, one bradyarrhythmia and 11 cardiac rhythms during critical clinical situations. In the implementation phase, four AEDs were indefinitely assigned to as many non-intensive wards. Periodical CPR-D courses and refresher exercises were run; the cardiology staff co-operated in the maintenance of the AEDs and in the registration of technical and clinical data. In the first period of this phase (9 months), AEDs were utilized in 24 cases by the ward-staff: in nine cases for VF (three patients were discharged alive from hospital) and in 15 cases for other rhythm detection in critical conditions. The number and the quality of these uses seem to confirm the favourable impact of the adoption of a more user-friendly defibrillator, such as an AED. The active co-operation between intensive and non-intensive staff was important to facilitate a quick activation of the chain of survival outside the intensive care units. We conclude that AEDs, which were developed for out-of-hospital use by non-physician operators, are suitable for use inside the hospital as well.

References (28)

  • W Kaye et al.

    Organizing and implementing a hospital-wide first-responder automated external defibrillation program: strengthening the in-hospital chain of survival

    Resuscitation

    (1995)
  • H Tunstall-Pedoe et al.

    Survey of 3765 cardiopulmonary resuscitations in British hospitals (the BRESUS study): methods and overall results

    Br Med J

    (1992)
  • C Lazzam et al.

    Predictors of survival of in-hospital cardiac arrest

    Can J Cardiol

    (1991)
  • SE Bedell et al.

    Survival after cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the hospital

    N Engl J Med

    (1983)
  • Cited by (61)

    • Electrical therapies in cardiac arrest

      2012, Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America
    • European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary

      2010, Resuscitation
      Citation Excerpt :

      At the time of the 2010 Consensus on CPR Science Conference, there were no published randomised trials comparing in-hospital use of AEDs with manual defibrillators. Two lower-level studies of adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest from shockable rhythms showed higher survival-to-hospital discharge rates when defibrillation was provided through an AED programme than with manual defibrillation alone.102,103 Despite limited evidence, AEDs should be considered for the hospital setting as a way to facilitate early defibrillation (a goal of <3 min from collapse), especially in areas where healthcare providers have no rhythm recognition skills or where they use defibrillators infrequently.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text