Original article
Bacteraemia in surgical patients with intravenous devices: A European multicentre incidence study

https://doi.org/10.1016/0195-6701(83)90004-XGet rights and content

Abstract

A survey of the incidence of bacteraemia and the use of intravenous (IV) devices among 10,616 surgical patients was performed in 42 hospitals in eight countries. It was found that 63 per cent of the patients surveyed had an IV device inserted at some time during their hospital stay, with national variations between 40 and 99 per cent. The incidence of device related thrombophlebitis was 10·3 per cent, with national variations between 7·8 and 28·4. Among the surgical patients not given IV therapy, 1·5/1000 had a bacteraemia, 0·5/1000 of them hospital-acquired. The corresponding figures for patients with a peripheral but no central IV device were 6·9 and 3·7, and for patients with a central venous catheter (CVC) 59·0 and 44·8, respectively. Even though there was a strong correlation between the incidence of bacteraemia and certain diagnoses there was also an independent correlation between it and CVCs or peripheral IV lines. No correlation was demonstrated between the number of catheter days per site for patients with a peripheral IV device, and hospital-acquired bacteraemia. This may be due to the low mean number of catheter days per site that was observed. There was a large and not easily explained national variation in the incidence of bacteraemia in patients with CVCs of between 16 and 108/1000.

References (8)

  • R.E. Dixon

    Effect of infections on hospital care

    Annals of Internal Medicine

    (1978)
  • J.E. McGowan et al.

    Bacteremia at Boston City Hospital: Occurrence and mortality during 12 selected years (1935–1972) with special reference to hospital-acquired cases

    Journal of Infectious Diseases

    (1975)
  • D.G. Maki

    Sepsis arising from extrinsic contamination of infusion and measures for control

  • D.G. Maki

    Epidemic nosocomial bacteremias

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (61)

  • Catheter-related and infusion-related sepsis

    2013, Critical Care Clinics
    Citation Excerpt :

    Catheter-related bacteremia or fungemia is the most frequent serious complication of these devices. In fact, 80% to 90% of intravascular device–related bacteremias and candidemias arise from central venous catheters,63,67,68 and central venous catheterization is the single greatest risk factor for nosocomial candidemia.69–71 The rate of catheter-related infection with central venous catheters is far higher than with peripheral venous catheters, which is in the range of 2% to 7%.12,14,15,23–25,27,28,72–78

  • Epidural abscesses

    2006, British Journal of Anaesthesia
    Citation Excerpt :

    It follows that all instrumentation should be performed as gently as possible. Duration of catheterization: studies quoting a low incidence of epidural infection often relate to catheterization for 2 days or less,102 119 but longer duration has been associated with an incidence of infection of 4.3%, a figure approaching that for intravascular devices.49 89 If increases in infection rates with time do approach those for intravascular devices it may be appropriate to extrapolate from data on pulmonary artery catheters where a greater risk of colonization exists after 5 days.106

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text