PaperA comparison of the spinal board and the vacuum stretcher, spinal stability and interface pressure
References (7)
- et al.
Changes in transcutaneous oxygen tension as a result of prolonged pressures at the sacrum
Clin Phys Physiol Meas.
(1988) Specifications for stretchers and other patient handling equipment in ambulances
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (35)
Prehospital Transport and Whole-Body Vibration
2021, Prehospital Transport and Whole-Body VibrationWilderness Medical Society Clinical Practice Guidelines for Spinal Cord Protection
2019, Wilderness and Environmental MedicineComparison of tissue-interface pressure in healthy subjects lying on two trauma splinting devices: The vacuum mattress splint and long spine board
2016, InjuryCitation Excerpt :Our results display that the VMS exerts a mean tissue-interface pressure below a previously reported skin ischemic threshold (9.3 kPa) in all tested areas [8,9]. This parameter is comparable to the results found by Lovell and Evans [7], who saw similar reductions in pressure in the sacral region, but did not include the occiput, scapulae, or heels. In this parameter, the mean pressure was found to be nearly 3X greater on the occiput in the SB compared to the VMS.
Wilderness medical society practice guidelines for spine immobilization in the austere environment: 2014 update
2014, Wilderness and Environmental MedicineAssessing attitudes toward spinal immobilization
2013, Journal of Emergency Medicine
Copyright © 1994 Published by Elsevier Ltd.