Original article
Reoperation in the intensive care unit

https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(90)90863-2Get rights and content

Abstract

From July 1, 1984, through June 30, 1989, after 1,239 open heart operations, 110 patients (8.7%) underwent 162 early reoperations either in the intensive care unit (144 procedures) or in the operating room (26 procedures). Reexploration for bleeding (49 procedures) (3.9%) and intraaortic balloon removal (50 procedures) (4.0%) were the two most common procedures. Ninety percent and 96% of these procedures, respectively, were performed in the intensive care unit. Mediastinal infections occurred in 4 (6.1%) of 66 patients undergoing repeat mediastinal operations for all indications. No infection occurred after reexploration for bleeding nor did mediastinal infection occur after reoperation in the intensive care unit. Post-operative death in these 110 patients was not related to reoperation except possibly in the case of 1 patient (0.9%). Average transit time to and from the operating room for patients returned there for reoperation was 89.7 minutes. Charges for procedures performed in the operating room were at least twice as great as for those performed in the intensive care unit. This experience supports expanded use of reoperation in the intensive care unit, as it is safe, effective, economical, and convenient.

References (7)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (37)

  • Planned cardiac reexploration in the intensive care unit is a safe procedure

    2014, Annals of Thoracic Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Operative mortality and the incidence of other major adverse events in this series are consistent with predicted surgical risk and other reported surgical series of high-risk surgical patients and those undergoing mediastinal reexploration. The 5.5% operative mortality rate among patients with expected mortality of 3% who underwent planned ICU reexplorations in this series compares favorably with rates in former surgical series describing reexplorations after cardiac operations in both operating room and ICU settings [1, 3, 5, 14]. In one report of patients undergoing ICU reexplorations, mortality was 6.7% among a patient population similar to those undergoing planned reexplorations in our study [1].

  • Part 8: Advanced life support: 2010 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations

    2010, Resuscitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Eleven studies documented improvement in outcome in patients with cardiac arrest following cardiac surgery who were treated with resternotomy and internal cardiac compression compared with standard protocol, when administered by experienced personnel in ICUs (LOE 2680,681; LOE 4682–690). Five studies neither supported nor opposed this finding (LOE 4691–694; LOE 5695). One study documented that the risk of infection was not significant after resternotomies conducted appropriately outside of the operating room (LOE 4)689; whereas three studies demonstrated very poor outcomes when resternotomy was performed outside an ICU (LOE 2680; LOE 4686; LOE 5695).

View all citing articles on Scopus

Presented at the Thirty-sixth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Scottsdale, AZ, Nov 9–11, 1989.

View full text