Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The prognostic signature of health-related quality of life in older patients admitted to the emergency department: a 6-month follow-up study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The management of older and multimorbid patients with complex care requires a personalised and comprehensive approach. The main diagnosis is often registered as the cause of hospitalisation, yet poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL) as well as multimorbidity may represent the underlying cause and markedly influence prognosis.

Aims

To analyse the association of HRQoL and clinical prognosis over time as assessed by a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)-based Multidimensional Prognostic Index (MPI) in older patients admitted to the emergency department (ED).

Methods

We used data from the prospective MPI–HOPE (Influence of the MPI on the Hospitalisation of Older Patients admitted to the Emergency department) study. Data from 165 patients (≥ 75 years) admitted to the ED of the University Hospital of Cologne, Germany, between Oct 2017 and Jan 2018 were included. Clinical prognosis was calculated by the MPI and HRQoL by the EQ5D-5L. Follow-up interviews assessed HRQoL up to 6 months after discharge.

Results

Most patients were multimorbid and presented with several geriatric syndromes. At admission, HRQoL was highest in patients with the best clinical prognosis. The MPI showed a negative correlation with the EQ-Index at admission (rs(86) = − 0.50, p < 0.0001) and follow-up assessments after 3 and 6 months (rs(86) = − 0.55 and rs(86) = − 0.47, p < 0.0001).

Discussion

Our results suggest that patients’ self-perceived HRQoL in the ED is related to functional health status and clinical prognosis.

Conclusion

The MPI as a multidimensional snapshot provides information on clinical health indicators and informs about subjective HRQoL, thereby helping in identifying patients who would benefit from a specific treatment within the frame of a patient-centered, value-based care strategy geriatric treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. European Commission (2017) Directorate General for Health and Food Safety. State of health in the EU: companion report, Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2875/684855

  2. Schüling K (2018) Kodierhandbuch Geriatrie (2018). In: Geriatrie B (ed) Schüling Verlag, Münster  

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dent E, Hoogendijk EO, Cardona-Morrell M et al (2016) Frailty in emergency departments. Lancet 387:434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carpenter CR, Shelton E, Fowler S et al (2015) Risk factors and screening instruments to predict adverse outcomes for undifferentiated older emergency department patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med 22:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weinrebe W, Schiefer Y, Weckmüller K et al (2019) Does the identification of seniors at risk (ISAR) score effectively select geriatric patients on emergency admission? Aging Clin Exp Res 31:1839–1842

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aminzadeh F, Dalziel WB (2002) Older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review of patterns of use, adverse outcomes, and effectiveness of interventions. Ann Emerg Med 39:238–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis G, Gardner M, Tsiachristas A et al (2017) Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD006211. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006211.pub3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ellis G, Whitehead MA, Robinson D et al (2011) Comprehensive geriatric assessment for older adults admitted to hospital: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 343:d6553

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Gladman JR, Conroy SP, Ranhoff AH et al (2016) New horizons in the implementation and research of comprehensive geriatric assessment: knowing, doing and the ‘know-do’gap. Age Ageing 45:194–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Polidori MC (2019) Geriatrics’ turning point. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  11. Meyer AM, Polidori MC (2019) Including prognosis evaluation in the management of older patients across different healthcare settings: the cologne experience. Geriatr Care 5:8663

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL (1993) Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118:622–629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A et al (2011) Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res 20:1727–1736

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Brazier J, Walters S, Nicholl J et al (1996) Using the SF-36 and Euroqol on an elderly population. Qual Life Res 5:195–204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lutomski JE, Krabbe PF, Bleijenberg N et al (2017) Measurement properties of the EQ-5D across four major geriatric conditions: findings from TOPICS-MDS. Health Qual Life Outcomes 15:45

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Pilotto A, Ferrucci L, Franceschi M et al (2008) Development and validation of a multidimensional prognostic index for one-year mortality from comprehensive geriatric assessment in hospitalized older patients. Rejuvenation Res 11:151–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Warnier R, Van Rossum E, Velthuijsen E et al (2016) Validity, reliability and feasibility of tools to identify frail older patients in inpatient hospital care: a systematic review. J Nutr Health Aging 20:218–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pilotto A, Rengo F, Marchionni N, group F-Ss et al (2012) Comparing the prognostic accuracy for all-cause mortality of frailty instruments: a multicentre 1-year follow-up in hospitalized older patients. PLoS ONE 7:e29090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Dent E, Kowal P, Hoogendijk EO (2016) Frailty measurement in research and clinical practice: a review. Europ J Intern Med 31:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Polidori MC (2017) Target and patient-oriented care using the comprehensive geriatric assessment: prognosis estimation for clinical decisions with elderly patients. Z Gerontol Geriatr 50:706–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Meyer AM, Becker I, Siri G et al (2019) New associations of the Multidimensional Prognostic Index. Z Gerontol Geriatr 52:460–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-018-01471-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ludwig K, von der Schulenburg J-MG, Greiner W (2018) German value set for the EQ-5D-5L. PharmacoEconomics 36:663–674

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR et al (1970) Progress in development of the index of ADL. Gerontol 10:20–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lawton MP, Brody EM (1969) Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontol 9:179–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Linn BS, Linn MW, Gurel L (1968) Cumulative illness rating scale. J Am Geriatr Soc 16:622–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bliss M, McLaren R, Exton-Smith A (1966) Mattresses for preventing pressure sores in geriatric patients. Monthly Bull Minist Health Public Health Lab Serv 25:238

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sancarlo D, D’Onofrio G, Franceschi M et al (2011) Validation of a Modified-Multidimensional Prognostic Index (m-MPI) including the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form (MNA-SF) for the prediction of one-year mortality in hospitalized elderly patients. J Nutr Health Aging 15:169–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Pfeiffer E (1975) A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 23:433–441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kane RL, Shamliyan T, Talley K et al (2012) The association between geriatric syndromes and survival. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:896–904

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Meyer AM, Becker I, Siri G et al (2020) The prognostic significance of geriatric syndromes and resources. Aging Clin Exp Res 32:115–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01168-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kojima G, Iliffe S, Jivraj S et al (2016) Association between frailty and quality of life among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health 70:716–721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Parlevliet JL, MacNeil-Vroomen J, Buurman BM et al (2016) Health-related quality of life at admission is associated with postdischarge mortality, functional decline, and institutionalization in acutely hospitalized older medical patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 64:761–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chin MH, Jin L, Karrison TG et al (1999) Older patients’ health-related quality of life around an episode of emergency illness. Ann Emerg Med 34:595–603

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ali TF, Warkentin LM, Gazala S, Care A, Group ES et al (2015) Self-Reported outcomes in individuals aged 65 and older admitted for treatment to an acute care surgical service: a 6-month prospective cohort study. J Am Geriatr Soc 63:2388–2394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Andreasen J, Gobbens RJ, Eriksen HH et al (2019) Health-related quality of life at hospital discharge as a predictor for 6-month unplanned readmission and all-cause mortality of acutely admitted older medical patients. Qual Life Res 28:3015–3024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hutchinson AF, Graco M, Rasekaba TM et al (2015) Relationship between health-related quality of life, comorbidities and acute health care utilisation, in adults with chronic conditions. Health Qual Life Outcomes 13:69

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Boyd CM, Darer J, Boult C et al (2005) Clinical practice guidelines and quality of care for older patients with multiple comorbid diseases: implications for pay for performance. JAMA 294:716–724

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Fried TR, McGraw S, Agostini JV et al (2008) Views of older persons with multiple morbidities on competing outcomes and clinical decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:1839–1844

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Lorgunpai SJ, Grammas M, Lee DS et al (2014) Potential therapeutic competition in community-living older adults in the US: use of medications that may adversely affect a coexisting condition. PLoS ONE 9:e89447

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Williams BC, Malani PN, Wesorick DH (2013) Hospitalists’ guide to the care of older patients. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Boyd C, Smith CD, Masoudi FA et al (2019) Decision making for older adults with multiple chronic conditions: executive summary for the American Geriatrics Society Guiding Principles on the Care of Older Adults With Multimorbidity. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:665–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Wieland GD et al (1984) Effectiveness of a geriatric evaluation unit. A randomized clinical trial. N Engl J Med 311:1664–1670. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198412273112604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S (2012) Shared decision making — The pinnacle patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 366:780–781. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1109283

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study design and preliminary results of the study have been presented at the 2018 Conference of the German society of geriatrics in Cologne (oral presentation), the 16th EUGMS Congress in Berlin (2018, poster presentation) as well as the 17th EUGM Congress in Krakow (2019, oral presentation). We wish to thank Lena Sannemann for her assistance with the statistics used in this report and her critical revision.

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MPR, VB and MCP conceived and designed the clinical trial. VB provided resources. MPR. LP performed the experiments. MPR analysed the data. MPR wrote the paper. MRP, AMM and MCP were involved in the conception of the manuscript. AMM, LP, AP, TB, VB and MCP contributed to critical revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Cristina Polidori.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Statement of human and animal rights

The study was registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00012694) and complies with the ethical rules for human experimentation that are stated in the Declaration of Helsinki (1983). It was approved by the Ethical Committee of the University Hospital of Cologne, Germany.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants or proxy respondent included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rarek, M.P., Meyer, A.M., Pickert, L. et al. The prognostic signature of health-related quality of life in older patients admitted to the emergency department: a 6-month follow-up study. Aging Clin Exp Res 33, 2203–2211 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01732-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-020-01732-8

Keywords

Navigation