Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of an infectious disease consultation programme in a German tertiary care hospital

  • Clinical and Epidemiological Study
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate a newly implemented infectious disease (ID) consultation service in terms of patient care, outcome and antibiotic prescription and to describe factors influencing adherence to recommendations.

Methods

Data from consultations during the first 6 months of the ID consultation program were collected and evaluated. Consultation requests, diagnostic results, treatment outcomes and antibiotic recommendations were categorised. Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations were assessed and rated for adherence and outcome. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors influencing adherence and treatment outcome.

Results

A total of 251 consultations were assessed. In most cases, ID specialists were asked for further advice regarding a previously initiated anti-infective treatment (N = 131, 52 %). In 54 of 195 (28 %) first consultations, the ID specialist proposed a differential diagnosis that differed from that of the working diagnoses submitted with the consultation request, and which was subsequently confirmed in 80 % of these cases. Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations were made in 190 (76 %) and 240 (96 %) of the consultations, respectively. A change in the current treatment was recommended in 66 % of consultations; 37 % of recommendations were cost-saving and 26 % were cost-neutral. Compliance with diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations was rated as good by pre-specified criteria in 65 and 86 % of consultations, respectively. Treatment outcome was correlated with adherence to diagnostic recommendations (P = 0.012). Twenty-nine patients (16 %) died during the same hospital stay.

Conclusion

Infectious disease consultations may help to establish the correct diagnosis, resulting in the appropriate treatment being provided to a severely sick patient population. Treatment outcome was improved in cases of good diagnostic adherence to the recommendations of the ID specialist.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mokdad AH, Marks JS, Stroup DF, Gerberding JL. Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004;291:1238–45. doi:10.1001/jama.291.10.1238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Canton R, Novais A, Valverde A, Machado E, Peixe L, Baquero F, et al. Prevalence and spread of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:144–53. doi:10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01850.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chambers HF, Deleo FR. Waves of resistance: Staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:629–41. doi:10.1038/nrmicro2200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Deshpande LM, Fritsche TR, Moet GJ, Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN. Antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from North America and Europe: a report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;58:163–70. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.12.022.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Raineri E, Pan A, Mondello P, Acquarolo A, Candiani A, Crema L. Role of the infectious diseases specialist consultant on the appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy prescription in an intensive care unit. Am J Infect Control. 2008;36:283–90. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2007.06.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fowler VG Jr, Sanders LL, Sexton DJ, Kong L, Marr KA, Gopal AK, et al. Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia according to compliance with recommendations of infectious diseases specialists: experience with 244 patients. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;27:478–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jenkins TC, Price CS, Sabel AL, Mehler PS, Burman WJ. Impact of routine infectious diseases service consultation on the evaluation, management, and outcomes of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:1000–8. doi:10.1086/529190.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson JO, Pozzi-Langhi S, Phillips M, Pearson JC, Christiansen KJ, Coombs GW, et al. Formal infectious diseases consultation is associated with decreased mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:2421–8. doi:10.1007/s10096-012-1585-y.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rieg S, Peyerl-Hoffmann G, de With K, Theilacker C, Wagner D, Hubner J, et al. Mortality of S. aureus bacteremia and infectious diseases specialist consultation–a study of 521 patients in Germany. J Infect. 2009;59:232–9. doi:10.1016/j.jinf.2009.07.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de La Blanchardiere A, Boutemy J, Thibon P, Michon J, Verdon R, Cattoir V. Clinical benefit of infectious diseases consultation: a monocentric prospective cohort study. Infection. 2012;40:501–7. doi:10.1007/s15010-012-0283-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Forsblom E, Ruotsalainen E, Ollgren J, Jarvinen A. Telephone consultation cannot replace bedside infectious disease consultation in the management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:527–35. doi:10.1093/cid/cis889.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gomez J, Conde Cavero SJ, Hernandez Cardona JL, Nunez ML, Ruiz Gomez J, Canteras M, et al. The influence of the opinion of an infectious disease consultant on the appropriateness of antibiotic treatment in a general hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1996;38:309–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. LaRocco A Jr. Concurrent antibiotic review programs–a role for infectious diseases specialists at small community hospitals. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:742–3. doi:10.1086/377286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sellier E, Pavese P, Gennai S, Stahl JP, Labarere J, Francois P. Factors and outcomes associated with physicians’ adherence to recommendations of infectious disease consultations for inpatients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:156–62. doi:10.1093/jac/dkp406.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. John JF Jr, Fishman NO. Programmatic role of the infectious diseases physician in controlling antimicrobial costs in the hospital. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:471–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yinnon AM. Whither infectious diseases consultations? Analysis of 14,005 consultations from a 5-year period. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33:1661–7. doi:10.1086/323760.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mondain V, Lieutier F, Hasseine L, Gari-Toussaint M, Poiree M, Lions C, et al. A 6-year antifungal stewardship programme in a teaching hospital. Infection. 2013;. doi:10.1007/s15010-013-0431-1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Boulware DR, Dekarske AS, Filice GA. Physician preferences for elements of effective consultations. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;25:25–30. doi:10.1007/s11606-009-1142-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lo E, Rezai K, Evans AT, Madariaga MG, Phillips M, Brobbey W, et al. Why don’t they listen? Adherence to recommendations of infectious disease consultations. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:1212–8. doi:10.1086/383315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sipahi OR, Tasbakan M, Pullukcu H, Arda B, Yamazhan T, Mizrakci S, et al. Accuracy of consultations performed by infectious diseases trainees and factors associated with adherence to them. Int J Infect Dis. 2007;11:518–23. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2007.02.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sellier E, Labarere J, Gennai S, Bal G, Francois P, Pavese P. Compliance with recommendations and clinical outcomes for formal and informal infectious disease specialist consultations. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30:887–94. doi:10.1007/s10096-011-1172-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim BN. Compliance with an infectious disease specialist’s advisory consultations on targeted antibiotic usage. J Infect Chemother. 2005;11:84–8. doi:10.1007/s10156-004-0365-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pulcini C, Pradier C, Samat-Long C, Hyvernat H, Bernardin G, Ichai C, et al. Factors associated with adherence to infectious diseases advice in two intensive care units. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;57:546–50. doi:10.1093/jac/dki483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pavese P, Sellier E, Laborde L, Gennai S, Stahl JP, Francois P. Requesting physicians’ experiences regarding infectious disease consultations. BMC Infect Dis. 2011;11:62. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-11-62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ceyhan M, Yildirim I, Ecevit C, Aydogan A, Ornek A, Salman N, et al. Inappropriate antimicrobial use in Turkish paediatric hospitals: a multicenter point prevalence survey. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;14:e55–61. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2009.03.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ingram PR, Seet JM, Budgeon CA, Murray R. Point-prevalence study of inappropriate antibiotic use at a tertiary Australian hospital. Intern Med J. 2012;42:719–21. doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2012.02809.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee CC, Lee CH, Chuang MC, Hong MY, Hsu HC, Ko WC. Impact of inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy on outcome of bacteremic adults visiting the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2011.11.010.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paul M, Shani V, Muchtar E, Kariv G, Robenshtok E, Leibovici L. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy for sepsis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:4851–63. doi:10.1128/AAC.00627-10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shorr AF, Micek ST, Welch EC, Doherty JA, Reichley RM, Kollef MH. Inappropriate antibiotic therapy in Gram-negative sepsis increases hospital length of stay. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:46–51. doi:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fa41a7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Thu TA, Rahman M, Coffin S, Harun-Or-Rashid M, Sakamoto J, Hung NV. Antibiotic use in Vietnamese hospitals: a multicenter point-prevalence study. Am J Infect Control. 2012;40:840–4. doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2011.10.020.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The ID consultation service, J.J.V., N.J., C.L., C.W., H.S., P.H., G.F. are supported by grant 01KI 0771 from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF). The authors would like to thank Candice Jones, BAA, Johannesburg, South Africa for language editing support.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. J. Vehreschild.

Additional information

G. Fätkenheuer and N. Jung contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 29 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vehreschild, J.J., Morgen, G., Cornely, O.A. et al. Evaluation of an infectious disease consultation programme in a German tertiary care hospital. Infection 41, 1121–1128 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-013-0512-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-013-0512-1

Keywords

Navigation