Skip to main content
Log in

Reliability in Interpretation of Median Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in the Setting of Coma: Factors and Implications

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neurocritical Care Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Median nerve short-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) are useful in determining prognosis for awakening after coma following hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, but reliability of interpretation is unclear.

Objective

To measure inter- and intra-observer reliability of determining presence or absence of SSEPs in comatose patients following hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy and to identify factors that enhance reliability.

Design

Retrospective review by four readers (experience ranging from 2–27 years) of SSEP recordings in 95 comatose patients. Twenty waveforms were presented twice and five waveforms were presented pre- and post-neuromuscular junction (NMJ) blockade.

Setting

Academic teaching hospital and level 1 trauma center.

Patients

Inpatients in coma due to hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy.

Measurements and Main Results

Kappa values among the four readers, reflecting inter-observer reliability, ranged from 0.39 to 0.79 (mean 0.60, SD 0.16), a level of agreement interpreted as “moderate.” Better inter-observer reliability was seen when: cortical amplitudes were ≥0.7 μV, baseline noise was smaller, and when experience level between reviewers was most similar. In cases examined both pre- and post-NMJ blockade, average kappa values of inter-observer reliability increased significantly from 0.03 pre-NMJ blockade to 0.41 post-NMJ blockade. Intra-observer reliability was higher than that for inter-observer, with a “substantial” average kappa of 0.84 (range 0.79–0.89, SD .06).

Conclusions

Inter- and intra-observer reliability of SSEP interpretation in comatose patients varies from moderate to substantial, respectively. In order to reliably interpret the presence of small cortical responses, NMJ blockade should be used when baseline noise is excessive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ, Tirschwell DL, Lew HL. Predictive value of somatosensory evoked potential (SEPs) for awakening from coma. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:960–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zandbergen EGJ, deHaan RJ, CP Stoutenbeek, Koelman JHTM, Hijdra A. Systematic review of early prediction of poor outcome in anoxic ischemic coma. Lancet. 1998;352:1808–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson LR, Micklesen PJ. Somatosensory evoked potentials in coma prognosis. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2004;15:43–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. London: Yale University Press; 1987. p. 186.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Longstreth WT Jr, Koepsell TD, van Belle G. Clinical neuroepidemiology I. Diagnosis. Arch Neurol. 1987;44:1091–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fleiss JL. The design and analysis of clinical experiment. New York: Wiley; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fleiss J. Statistical methods for rates and proportions, Chapter 13. New York: Wiley; 1981.

  8. Zandbergen EGJ, Hijdra A, deHaan RJ, et al. Inter-observer variation in the interpretation of SSEPs in anoxic-ischaemic coma. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117:1529–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington School of Medicine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin Hakimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hakimi, K., Kinney, G., Kraft, G. et al. Reliability in Interpretation of Median Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in the Setting of Coma: Factors and Implications. Neurocrit Care 11, 353–361 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-009-9251-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-009-9251-7

Keywords

Navigation