Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of an electronic control device on muscle injury as determined by creatine kinase enzyme

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The medical literature on the effect of electronic control devices (ECD) on muscle injury is sparse. In this paper, we examine pooled data from five human studies that used creatine kinase (CK) as a marker for muscle injury. CK was measured in five separate studies involving four TASER ECDs with different exposure durations and number of circuits or contact points. Device type, exposure duration, number of circuits or contact points, and CK values at baseline and 24 h after exposure were pooled from these previous studies. Data were analyzed to determine the correlation of CK to duration of exposure, number of contact points, and distance between the probes. The pooled results contained 163 subjects. Seven were withdrawn due to incomplete data, leaving 156 subjects for analysis (median age 36, range 19–67, 93.6% male). 121 (77.6%) subjects had 2 contacts points, 10 (6.4%) had 3 contact points, 18 (11.5%) had 4 contact points, and 7 (4.5%) had 6 contact points. 81 (51.9%) subjects had a 5-s exposure, 64 (41.0%) a 10-s exposure, and, 11 (7.1%) a 30-s exposure. Median baseline CK (145 U/l, IQR 104–217, range 12–1956) did not differ between groups (P = 0.213 for number of contact points, 0.124 for duration). For the number of contacts, the median change in CK for 2 points of contact was 32 (IQR −1 to 1513, range −205 to 1821), for 3 was 1456 (IQR 634–1868, range 101–25452), for 4 was 887 (IQR 285–7481, range −1054 to 7481), and for 6 was 846 (IQR 57–1149, range −8 to 2309), (P < 0.001). For duration, the median change in CK for 5 s was 26.5 (IQR −8 to 109, range −1054 to 2309), for 10 s was 303 (IQR 34.5–1073, range −205 to 25452), and for 30 s was 47 (IQR 23–82, range −140 to 364), (P < 0.001). There was a relationship between the number of points of contact and the change in CK (P < 0.001) but not a relationship between the duration and the change in CK (P = 0.496). The median spread between the probe pairs for our pooled data was 40 cm, with a range from 18 to 70 cm (n = 76). The correlation between the change in CK and spread between the probe pairs was 0.16 at baseline (P = 0.18), and 0.24 at 24 h (P = 0.04) by Spearman’s rank correlation. ECD exposure can cause a modest increase in CK. Although we cannot draw conclusions about the individual devices included in this analysis, our findings indicated that multiple contact points or exposures may result in a larger increase in CK, but the duration of the exposure does not appear to have a significant effect on CK. There is a correlation between the distance between the probes and the change in CK.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reilly J, Diamant A, Comeaux J. Dosimetry considerations for electrical stun devices. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54:1319–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Despa F, Basati S, Zhang Z, D’Andrea J, Reilly J, Bodnar E, Lee R. Electromuscular incapacitation results from stimulation of spinal reflexes. Bioelectromagnetics. 2009;30:411–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun H, Webster J. Estimating neuromuscular stimulation within the human torso with TASER stimulus. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52:6401–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ho JD, Miner JR, Lakireddy DR, et al. Cardiovascular and physiologic effects of conducted electrical weapon discharge in resting adults. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:589–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dawes D, Ho J, Reardon R, Sweeney J, Miner J. The physiologic effects of multiple simultaneous electronic control device discharges. West J Emerg Med. 2010;11:49–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brancaccio P, Maffulli N, Buonauro R, Limongelli F. Serum enzyme monitoring in sports medicine. Clin Sports Med. 2008;27:1–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jauchem J, Sherry C, Fines D, Cook MC. Acidosis, lactate, electrolytes, muscle enzymes, and other factors in the blood of Sus scrofa following repeated TASER exposures. Forensic Sci Int. 2006;161:20–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jauchem J, Beason C, Cook M. Acute effects of an alternative electronic control device waveform in swine. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2009;5:2–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jauchem J, Cook M, Beason C. Blood factors of Sus scrofa following a series of three TASER electronic control device exposures. Forensic Sci Int. 2008;175:166–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dennis A, Valentino D, Walter R, Nagy K, Winners J, Bokhari F, Wiley D, Joseph K, Roberts R. Acute effects of TASER X26 discharges in a swine model. J Trauma. 2007;63:581–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanford J, Jacobs G, Roe E, Terndrup T. Two patients subdued with a TASER device: cases and review of complications. J Emerg Med. 2008. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.059.

  12. Bozeman W, Hauda W, Heck J, Graham D, Martin B, Winslow J. Safety and injury profile of conducted electrical weapons used by law enforcement officers against criminal suspects. Ann Emerg Med. 2009;53(4):480–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bui E, Sourkes M, Wennberg R. Generalized tonic-clonic seizure after a TASER shot to the head. CMAJ. 2009;180(6):625–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hick J, Smith S, Lynch M. Metabolic acidosis in restraint-associated cardiac arrest: a case series. Acad Emerg Med. 1999;6(3):239–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Merigian K, Roberts J. Cocaine intoxication: hyperpyrexia, rhabdomyolysis, and acute renal failure. Clin Toxicol. 1987;25:135–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Menashe P, Gottlieb J. Hyperthermia, rhabdomyolysis, and myoglobinuric renal failure after recreational use of cocaine. South Med J. 1988;81(3):379–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sinert R, Kohl L, Reinone T, Scalea T. Exercise-induced rhabdomyolysis. Ann Emerg Med. 1994;23(6):1301–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin AC-M, Lin C-M, Wang T-L, Leu J-G. Rhabdomyolysis in 119 students after repetitive exercise. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39:e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Welch R, Todd K, Krause G. Incidence of cocaine-associated rhabdomyolysis. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20(2):154–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Goldstein R, DesLauriers C, Burda A. Cocaine: history, social implications, and toxicity—a review. Dis Mon. 2009;55:6–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Horowitz B, Panacek E, Jouriles N. Severe rhabdomyolysis with renal failure after intranasal cocaine use. J Emerg Med. 1997;15(6):833–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Roth D, Alarcon F, Fernandez J, Preston R, Bourgoignie J. Acute rhabdomyolysis associated with cocaine intoxication. N Engl J Med. 1988;319:673–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Albertson T, Derlet R, Van Hoozen B. Methamphetamine and the expanding complications of amphetamines. West J Med. 1999;170:214–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kedrick WC, Hull AR, Knochel JP. Rhabdomyolyis and shock after intravenuous amphetamine administration. Ann Int Med. 1977;86(4):381–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Vanholder R, Sever M, Erek E, Lameire N. Rhabdomyolysis. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11:1553–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tan W, Herzlich B, Funaro R, Koutelos K, Pagala M, Amaladevi B, Grob D. Rhabdomyolysis and myoglobinuric acute renal failure associated with classic heat stroke. South Med J. 1995;88(10):1065–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Heatstroke and rhabdomyolysis presenting as fulminant hepatic failure. Postgrad Med J. 1988;64(748):157–9.

  28. Enoka RM. Morphologic features and activation patterns of motor units. J Clin Neurophysiol. 1995;12:538–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ding J, Wexler A, Binder-MacLeod SA. A mathematical model that predicts the force-frequency relationship of human skeletal muscle. Muscle Nerve. 2002;26:477–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson MA, Polfar J, Weightman D, Appleton D. Data on the distribution of fiber types in thirty-six human muscles: an autopsy study. J Neurol Sci. 1973;18:111–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gregory CM, Bickel CS. Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation. Phys Ther. 2005;85:358–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Drs. Dawes is an external medical consultant to TASER International, Inc. Dr. Ho is the medical director for TASER International, Inc. Both Drs. Dawes and Ho are company stockholders. Dr. Sweeney is a member of the scientific and medical advisory board for TASER International. The remaining authors have no conflicts to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey D. Ho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dawes, D.M., Ho, J.D., Sweeney, J.D. et al. The effect of an electronic control device on muscle injury as determined by creatine kinase enzyme. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 7, 3–8 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9187-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-010-9187-4

Keywords

Navigation