Skip to main content
Log in

„Speaking Up“ statt tödlichem Schweigen im Krankenhaus

Die entscheidende Rolle der Gruppenprozesse und Organisationskultur

Speaking Up instead of deadly silence in hospitals

The importance of group processes and organisation culture

  • Hauptbeiträge
  • Published:
Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie (GIO) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Artikel beschreiben wir die Relevanz des Schweigens vs. Speaking Up für die Patientenbehandlung im Krankenhaus. Schweigen bedeutet, absichtlich potentiell wichtige Informationen, Bedenken, Vorschläge oder Fragen zurückzuhalten. Das erwünschte Gegenteil des Schweigens ist Speaking Up – das absichtliche Äussern einer Idee, einer persönlichen Meinung oder Sorge und das Nachfragen bei Zweifeln – in der Regel gegenüber Vorgesetzten, aber auch gegenüber Kollegen/-innen. Speaking Up dient nicht nur der Prävention und schnellen Behebung von Fehlern, z. B. durch aufmerksam Machen und Nachfragen. Es ermöglicht auch das Zusammenarbeiten im hochkomplexen Arbeitsfeld Krankenhaus und ist ein zentrales Element organisationalen Lernens. Problematisch ist, dass in Krankenhäusern das Schweigen im Vergleich zu Speaking Up überwiegt. Wir erläutern anhand des aktuellen Forschungsstandes, dass die Gründe für Schweigen im Klima und in den sozialen Interaktionsprozessen der Gruppen und Organisationen anstatt in fehlender Motivation oder persönlicher Inkompetenz zum Speaking Up liegen. Basierend auf paradoxen Interventionen geben wir sowohl paradoxe Ratschläge – scherzhafte, kurzweilige und nicht ernstgemeinte Empfehlungen für ungewolltes Schweigen anstatt Speaking Up, als auch Speaking Up-begünstigende Handlungsempfehlungen.

Abstract

We describe the importance of silence versus speaking up for patient care. Silence is defined as intentionally withholding work-related ideas, information, and opinions. Speaking up or voice is defined as intentionally expressing work-related ideas, information, and opinions. Speaking up is not only important for error prevention and correction in healthcare. It also allows for working together in highly diverse teams in complex clinical settings in hospitals and is a core element of organizational learning. However, speaking up is rare in hospitals. Based on recent literature we describe that the scarcity of speaking up is due to organizational climates and group interaction processes rather than to lack of individual skill or motivation to speak up. In addition to provide speaking up-enabling ideas, using the concept of organizational paradoxes we provide paradoxical recommendations as humorous and unserious tips for increasing undesired silence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Notes

  1. Das Team-Time-Out ist ein von der Weltgesundheitsorganisation (WHO) vorgeschlagenes Vorgehen, bei dem alle an der Operation beteiligten Personen vor Operationsbeginn verbal eine Checkliste durcharbeiten, in der alle wichtigen Behandlungsstandards für den/die Patienten/-in enthalten sind (z. B. Identität des/der Patienten/-in, bekannte Allergien des/der Patienten/-in, Namen und Rollen aller Teammitglieder & erwartete Komplikationen, World Health Organization 2009).

Literatur

  • Argyris, C. (1980). Making the undiscussable and its undiscussability discussable. Public Administrative Review, 40(3), 205–213. doi:10.2307/975372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientic American, 193, 31–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avey, J. B., Wernsing, T. S., & Palanski, M. E. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: the mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(1), 21–34. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1298-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belyansky, I., Martin, T. R., Prabhu, A. S., Tsirline, V. B., Howley, L. D., Phillips, R., Sindram, D., Heniford, B. T., & Stefanidis, D. (2011). Poor resident-attending intraoperative communication may compromise patient safety. Journal of Surgical Research, 171, 386–394. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.04.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bienefeld, N., & Grote, G. (2012). Silence that may kill: when aircrew members don’t speak up and why. Aviation Psychology and Applied Human Factors, 2(1), 1–10. doi:10.1027/2192-0923/a000021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienefeld, N., & Grote, G. (2013). Speaking up in multiteam systems: effects of psychological safety, status, and leadership within and across teams. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology, 23, 930–945. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2013.808398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienefeld, N., & Grote, G. (2014). Shared leadership in multiteam systems: How cockpit and cabin crews lead each other to safety. Human Factors, 56, 270–286. doi:10.1177/0018720813488137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bisel, R. S., Messersmith, A. S., & Kelley, K. M. (2012). Supervisor-subordinate communication: hierarchical mum effect meets organizational learning. Journal of Business Communication, 49, 128–147. doi:10.1177/0021943612436972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blum, R. H., Raemer, D. B., Simon, R., & Pian-Smith, M. (2006). Attending anesthesiologist responses to resident challenge: the Two-Challenge Rule. Simulation in Healthcare, 1, 130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bould, M. D., Sutherland, S., Sydor, D., Naik, V., & Friedman, Z. (2015). Residents’ reluctance to challenge negative hierarchy in the operating room: a qualitative study. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d’anesthésie, 62, 576–586. doi:10.1007/s12630-015-0364-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, F., & Blackmon, K. (2003). Spirals of silence: the dynamics of diversity on organizational voice. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1393–1417. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C. S., Salas, E., Wilson-Donnelly, K., & Priest, H. (2004). How to turn a team of experts into an expert medical team: guidance from the aviation and military communities. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13(Suppl 1), i96-i104. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.009829.

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 851–875. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: the mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 250–260. doi:10.1080/10400419.2010.504654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. B., Singer, S. J., Hayes, J., Sales, M., Vogt, J. W., Raemer, D., & Meyer, G. S. (2011). Design and evaluation of simulation scenarios for a program introducing patient safety, teamwork, safety leadership, and simulation to healthcare leaders and managers. Simulation in Healthcare, 6, 231–238. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31821da9ec.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crant, J. M., Kim, T.-Y., & Wang, J. (2011). Dispositional antecedents of demonstration and usefulness of voice behavior. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dankoski, M. E., Bickel, J., & Gusic, M. E. (2014). Discussing the undiscussable with the powerful: Why and how faculty must learn to counteract organizational silence. Academic Medicine, 89, 1610–1613. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000428.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • DeRue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Hollenbeck, J. R., & Workman, K. (2012). A quasi-experimental study of after-event reviews and leadership development. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 997–1015. doi:10.1037/a0028244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 869–884. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.26279183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. (2011). Implicit voice theories: taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 461–488. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2011.61967925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2007). Why employees are afraid to speak. Harvard Business Review, 5, 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J. R., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisor’s and skil-level leaders influence employee voice. Organization Science, 21(1), 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, J. (1994). Primum non tacere. An ethics of speaking up. Hastings Center Report, 24(1), 13–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, E. R., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Mathieu, J. E. (2013). Helping teams to help themselves: comparing two team-led debriefing methods. Personnel Psychology, 66, 975–1008. doi:10.1111/peps.12041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383. doi:10.2307/2666999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1419–1452. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2012a). Teaming: How organizations learn, innovate, and compete in the knowledge economy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. (2012b). Teamwork on the Fly. Harvard Business Review, 90(4). http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=42421. Zugegriffen: 22.11.2016

  • Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23–43. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C., & McLain Smith, D. (2006). Too hot to handle? How to manage relationship conflict. California Management Review, 49(1), 6–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M., Ashkanasy, N. M., & Gardner, J. (2009). Deciding to speak up or to remain silent following observed wrongdoing: The role of discrete emotions and climate of silence. In J. Greenberg & M. Edwards (Hrsg.), Voice and Silence in Organizations (S. 83–109). Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eppich, W. (2015). “Speaking Up” for patient safety in the pediatric emergency department. Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine, 16, 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eppich, W., Mullan, P. C., Brett-Fleegler, M., & Cheng, A. (2016). “Let’s talk about it”: translating lessons from healthcare simulation to clinical event debriefings and clinical coaching conversations. Clinical Pediatric Emergency Medicine, 17, 200–211. doi:10.1016/j.cpem.2016.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farh, C. I. C., & Chen, Z. (2014). Beyond the individual victim: multilevel consequences of abusive supervision in teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1074–1095. doi:10.1037/a0037636.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R., & Bartel, C. A. (2014). Managing to stay in the dark: managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1013–1034. doi:10.5465/amj.2012.0393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, P., Greitemeyer, T., Pollozek, F., & Frey, D. (2006). The unresponsive bystander: Are bystanders more responsive in dangerous emergencies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36, 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, M. L., & Fainshmidt, S. (2012). Voice climate, work outcomes, and the mediating role of psychological empowerment: a multilevel examination. Group & Organization Management, 37, 691–715. doi:10.1177/1059601112463960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, J. B., Marler, L. E., & Hester, K. (2006). Promoting felt responsibility for constructive change and proactive behavior: exploring aspects of an elaborated model of work design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 1089–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginnett, R. C. (1993). Crews as groups: their formation and their leadership. In E. L. Wiener, B. G. Kanki & R. L. Helmreich (Hrsg.), Cockpit resource mangement (S. 71–98). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, B., Weiss, M., Biro, P., Grote, G., Steiger, P., Spahn, D. R., & Kolbe, M. (2015). Ist Reden wichtig? Technisches versus kombiniert technisches/nicht-technisches Atemwegstraining in der Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin. Anästhesiologie & Intensivmedizin, 56, 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2013). Rocking the boat but keeping it steady: the role of emotion regulation in employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 1703–1723. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.0035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Gino, F. (2010). A little thanks goes a long way: explaining why gratitude expressions motivate prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 946–955. doi:10.1037/a0017935.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grote, G., & Kolbe, M. (2015). Organisationstheoretische Ansätze und Systemtheorien. In P. Gausmann, M. Henninger & J. Koppenberg (Hrsg.), Patientensicherheitsmanagement (S. 57–61). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen, K., & Dayton, E. (2006). Organizational silence and hidden threats to patient safety. Health Services Research, 41, 1539–1554. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00564.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hirak, R., Peng, A. C., Carmeli, A., & Schaubroeck, J. M. (2012). Linking leader inclusiveness to work unit performance: the importance of psychological safety and learning from failures. The Leadership Quaterly, 23(1), 107–117. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, E. L., Wampold, B. E., & Nelson, M. L. (1990). Use of paradoxical intervention with a couple: an interactional analysis. Journal of Family Therapy, 3, 385–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, T. M., Harrison, D. A., Burris, E. R., & Detert, J. R. (2015). Who gets credit for input? Demographic and structural status cues in voice recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1765–1784. doi:10.1037/apl0000025.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jentsch, F., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2001). Assertiveness and team performance: More than “just say no”. In E. Salas, C. A. Bowers & E. Edens (Hrsg.), Improving teamwork in organizations. Applications of resource management training (S. 73–94). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakkar, H., Tangirala, S., Srivastava, N. K., & Kamdar, D. (2016). The dispositional antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 1342–1351. doi:10.1037/apl0000130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, D. O., Cheng, A., & Mullan, P. C. (2015). Debriefing in the emergency department after clinical events: a practical guide. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 65, 690–698. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Edmondson, A. C. (2009). Silenced by fear: the nature, sources, and consequneces of fear at work. Research in organizational behavior, 29, 163–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoll, M., & Dick, R. (2012). Do I hear the whistle…? A first attempt to measure four forms of employee silence and their correlates. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 349–362. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1308-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, H., Pian-Smith, M., Sato, M., Sawa, R., Takeshita, T., & Raemer, D. (2006). A cross-cultural survey of residents’ perceived barriers in questioning/challenging authority. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 15, 277–283. doi:10.1136/qshc.2005.017368.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, M. (2013). Five simple processes that improve high-risk team effectiveness. In E. Salas, S. Tannenbaum, D. Cohen & G. Latham (Hrsg.), Developing and enhancing teamwork in organizations: evidence-based best practices and guidelines (S. 609–643). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, M., & Grande, B. (2016). Speak Up. Wenn Schweigen gefährlich ist. In D. Schwappach & K. Gehring (Hrsg.), Sag ich’s oder sag ich’s lieber nicht’ – unser alltägliches Speaking-Up-Dilemma (S. 13–19). Zürich: Stiftung für Patientensicherheit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Nohynkova, R., Manser, T., Spahn, D., & Grote, G. (2012). Speaking-up is related to better team performance in simulated anesthesia inductions: an observational study. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 115, 1099–1108. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318269cd32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, M., Burtscher, M., & Manser, T. (2013). Co-ACT--A framework for observing coordination behavior in acute care teams. BMJ Quality & Safety, 22, 596–605. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Waller, M. J., Wacker, J., Grande, B., Burtscher, M., & Spahn, D. (2014). Monitoring and talking to the room: autochthonous coordination patterns in team interaction and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 1254–1267. doi:10.1037/a0037877.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolbe, M., Grande, B., & Spahn, D. R. (2015). Briefing and debriefing during simulation-based training and beyond: content, structure, attitude, and setting. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2015.01.002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, D. J., & Milan, M. A. (1983). Reframing and paradoxical instruction to overcome “resistance” in the treatment of delinquent youths: a multiple baseline study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 655–660.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, C. F., & Mayer, D. M. (2014). When do employees speak up for their customers? A model of voice in a customer service context. Personnel Psychology, 67, 637–666. doi:10.1111/peps.12050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané, B., & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853–868. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J. A., & Van Dyne, L. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 326–336. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.326.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, H., Dierynck, B., Anseel, F., Simons, T., Halbesleben, J. R. B., McCaughey, D., Savage, G. T., & Sels, L. (2012). Behavioral integrity for safety, priority of safety, psychological safety, and patient safety: a team-level study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 1273–1281. doi:10.1037/a0030076.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, J., Farh, C. I. C., & Farh, J.-L. (2012). Psychological antecedents of promotive and prohibitive voice: a two-wave examinination. The Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, S.-H., & Johnson, R. E. (2015). A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1381–1397. doi:10.1037/apl0000018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Zhu, R., & Yang, Y. (2010). I warn you because I like you: voice behavior, employee identifications, and transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(1), 189–202. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.10.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2013). The relational antecedents of voice targeted at different leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 841–851. doi:10.1037/a0032913.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Tangirala, S., Lam, W., Chen, Z., Jia, R. T., & Huang, X. (2015). How and when peers’ positive mood influences employees’ voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 976–989. doi:10.1037/a0038066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Luque, M. F. S., & Sommer, S. M. (2000). The impact of culture on feedback-seeking behavior: an integrated model and propositions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 829–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyndon, A., Sexton, J. B., Simpson, K. R., Rosenstein, A., Lee, K. A., & Wachter, R. M. (2012). Predictors of likelihood of speaking up about safety concerns in labour and delivery. BMJ Quality & Safety, 21, 791–799. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2010-050211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manser, T. (2009). Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: a review of the literature. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 53, 143–151. doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., & Rapp, T. L. (2009). Laying the foundation for successful team performance trajectories: the roles of team charters and performance strategies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 90–103. doi:10.1037/a0013257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1453–1476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: integration and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 373–412. doi:10.1080/19416520.2011.574506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 173–197. doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W., Wheeler-Smith, S., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Speaking up in groups: a cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183–191.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mullan, P. C., Kessler, D. O., & Cheng, A. (2014). Educational opportunities with postevent debriefing. JAMA, 312, 2333–2334. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.15741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 941–966. doi:10.1002/job.413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaou, I., Vakola, M., & Bourantas, D. (2008). Who speaks up at work? Dispositional influences on employees’ voice behavior. Personnel Review, 37, 666–679. doi:10.1108/00483480810906892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, P., Byrne, D., O’Dea, A., McVeigh, T. P., & Kerin, M. J. (2013). “Excuse Me:” teaching interns to speak up. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 39, 426–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Okuyama, A., Wagner, C., & Bijnen, B. (2014). Speaking up for patient safety by hospital-based health care professionals: a literature review. BMC Health Service Research, 14, 61–69. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-14-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pian-Smith, M. C. M., Simon, R., Minehart, R. D., Podraza, M., Rudolph, J., Walzer, T., & Raemer, D. (2009). Teaching residents the Two-Challenge Rule: a simulation-based approach to improve education and patient safety. Simulation in Healthcare, 4, 84–91. doi:10.1097/SIH.0b013e31818cffd3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. In M. R. Buckley, J. R. B. Halbesleben & A. R. Wheeler (Eds.) Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 20, 331–369. Bingley: Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porath, C. L., & Erez, A. (2009). Overlooked but not untouched: How rudeness reduces onlookers’ performance on routine and creative tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 29–44. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porath, C. L., & Pearson, C. M. (2010). The cost of bad behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 39(1), 64–71. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2009.10.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porath, C. L., Gerbasi, A., & Schorch, S. L. (2015). The effects of civility on advice, leadership, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1527–1541. doi:10.1037/apl0000016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T., & Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: a constitutive approach. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171. doi:10.1080/19416520.2016.1162421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raemer, D. B. (2010). The healthy hospital. Maximizing the satisfaction of patients, health workers, and community. In E. Yano, I. Kawachi & M. Nakao (Hrsg.), The clinician’s response to challenging cases (S. 27–32). Tokyo: Shinohara Shinsha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raemer, D. B., Kolbe, M., Minehart, R. D., Rudolph, J. W., & Pian-Smith, M. C. M. (2016). Improving anesthesiologists’ ability to speak up in the operating room: a randomized controlled experiment of a simulation-based intervention and a qualitative analysis of hurdles and enablers. Academic Medicine, 91, 530–539. doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000001033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynard, J., Reynolds, J., & Stevenson, P. (2009). Practical patient safety. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riskin, A., Erez, A., Foulk, T. A., Kugelman, A., Gover, A., Shoris, I., Riskin, K. S., & Bamberger, P. A. (2015). The impact of rudeness on medical team performance: a randomized trial. Pediatrics, 136, 487–495. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-1385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, J. W., Simon, R., Rivard, P., Dufresne, R. L., & Raemer, D. B. (2007). Debriefing with good judgment: combining rigorous feedback with genuine inquiry. Anesthesiology Clinics, 25, 361–376. doi:10.1016/j.anclin.2007.03.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russ, S., Rout, S., Caris, J., Mansell, J., Davies, R., Mayer, E., Moorthy, K., Darzi, A., Vincent, C., et al. (2015). Measuring variation in use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in the operating room: a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 220(1), 1–11.e14. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.09.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sachse, R., & Collatz, A. (2012). Wie ruiniere ich meine Karriere - und zwar systematisch! Suttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanner, B., & Bunderson, J. S. (2015). When feeling safe isn’t enough: contextualizing models of safety and learning in teams. Organizational Psychology Review, 5, 224–243. doi:10.1177/2041386614565145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, T., Loren, D., & Halamek, L. P. (2016). Post-event debriefings during neonatal care: Why are we not doing them, and how can we start. Journal of Perinatology, 36(6), 415–419. doi:10.1038/jp.2016.42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sayre, M. M., McNeese-Smith, D., Leach, L. S., & Phillips, L. R. (2012). An educational intervention to increase “Speaking-Up” behaviors in nurses and improve patient safety. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 27, 154–160. doi:10.1097/ncq.0b013e318241d9ff.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz-Hardt, S., Brodbeck, F. C., Mojzisch, A., Kerschreiter, R., & Frey, D. (2006). Group decision making in hidden profile situations: dissent as a facilitator for decision quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1080–1093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwappach, D., & Gehring, K. (2014a). Trade-offs between voice and silence: a qualitative exploration of oncology staff’s decisions to speak up about safety concerns. BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schwappach, D. L. B., & Gehring, K. (2014b). ‘Saying it without words’: a qualitative study of oncology staff’s experiences with speaking up about safety concerns. BMJ Open, 4(5), e004740. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004740.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schwappach, D. L. B., & Gehring, K. (2014c). Silence that can be dangerous: a vignette study to assess healthcare professionals’ likelihood of speaking up about safety concerns. PLoS ONE, 9, e104720. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0104720.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schwappach, D. L. B., & Gehring, K. (2015). Frequency of and predictors for withholding patient safety concerns among oncology staff: a survey study. European Journal of Cancer Care, 24, 395–403. doi:10.1111/ecc.12255.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwappach, D. L. B., & Gehring, K. (Hrsg.). (2016). Speak Up. Wenn Schweigen gefährlich ist. Zürich: Stiftung für Patientensicherheit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoham-Salomon, V., & Rosenthal, R. (1987). Paradoxical intervention: a meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55(1), 22–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, F. B., & Rech-Simon, C. (2007). Zirkuläres Fragen. Systemische Therapie in Fallbeispielen: Ein Lernbuch (7. Aufl.). Heidelberg: Carl-Auer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souba, W., Way, D., Lucey, C., Sedmak, D., & Notestine, M. (2011). Elephants in academic medicine. Academic Medicine, 86, 1492–1499. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182356559.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, R. (2013). Speaking Up — When doctors navigate medical hierarchy. New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 302–305. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1212410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • St.Pierre, M., Scholler, A., Strembski, D., & Breuer, G. (2012). Äussern Assistenzärzte und Pflegekräfte sicherheitsrelevante Bedenken? Simulatorstudie zum Einfluss des „Autoritätsgradienten“/Do residents and nurses communicate safety relevant concerns? Simulation study on the influence of the authority gradient. Anaesthesist, 61, 857–866. doi:10.1007/s00101-012-2086-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • St.Pierre, M., Breuer, G., Strembski, D., Schmitt, C., & Lütcke, B. (2016). Briefing improves the management of a difficult mask ventilation in infants. Der Anaesthesist, 65, 681–689. doi:10.1007/s00101-016-0213-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stamper, C. L., & Dyne, L. V. (2001). Work status and organizational citizenship behavior: a field study of restaurant employees. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 517–536. doi:10.1002/job.100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, K. M., Lewton, E., & Rosenthal, M. M. (2004). Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Academic Medicine, 79, 186–194.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, R., Chen, Z., & Cheung, S. Y. (2012). Applying uncertainty management theory to employee voice behavior: an integrative investigation. Personnel Psychology, 65, 283–323. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01247.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008a). Employee silence on critical work issues: the cross level effects of procedural justice climate. Personnel Psychology, 61(1), 37–68. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2008.00105.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008b). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: the effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1189–1203. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2008.35732719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2012). Ask and you shall year (but not always): examining the relationship between manager consulting and employee voice. Personnel Psychology, 65, 251–282. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01248.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangirala, S., Kamdar, D., Venkataramani, V., & Parke, M. R. (2013). Doing right versus getting ahead: the effects of duty and achievement orientations on employees’ voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 1040–1050. doi:10.1037/a0033855.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, S. I., & Cerasoli, C. P. (2013). Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors, 55(1), 231–245. doi:10.1177/0018720812448394.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, S. I., & Goldhaber-Fiebert, S. (2013). Medical team debriefs: simple, powerful, underutilized. In E. Salas & K. Frush (Hrsg.), Improving patient safety through teamwork and team training (S. 249–256). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, A. L., & Edmondson, A. C. (2003). Why hospitals don’t learn from failures: organizational and psychological dynamics that inhibit system change. California Management Review, 45, 55–72. doi:10.2307/41166165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, S., & Turner, N. (2014). Safety voice among young workers facing dangerous work: a policy-capturing approach. Safety Science, 62, 530–537. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1359–1392. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vashdi, D. R., Bamberger, P. A., & Erez, M. (2013). Can surgical teams ever learn? The role of coordination, complexity, and transitivity in action team learning. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 945–971. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataramani, V., & Tangirala, S. (2010). When and why do central employees speak up? An examination of mediating and moderating variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 582–591. doi:10.1037/a0018315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1275–1286. doi:10.1037/a0015848.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.-D., & Hsieh, H.-H. (2013). Organizational ethical climate, perceived organizational support, and employee silence: a cross-level investigation. Human Relations, 66, 783–802. doi:10.1177/0018726712460706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, X., Zhang, Z.-X., & Chen, X.-P. (2015). I will speak up if my voice is socially desirable: a moderated mediating process of promotive versus prohibitive voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1641–1652. doi:10.1037/a0039046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M. (2014). Speaking up for the patient. Individual and team-related antecedents of voice in healthcare teams. PhD-Thesis. Zürich: ETH Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Dambach, M., Marty, A., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2014). Agency and communion predict speaking up in acute care teams. Small Group Research, 45, 290–313. doi:10.1177/1046496414531495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, M., Kolbe, M., Grote, G., Spahn, D. R., & Grande, B. (2016). Why didn’t you say something? Using after-event reviews to affect voice behavior and hierarchy beliefs in multi-professional action teams. European Journal of Work and Organization Psychology, Advanced online publication doi:10.1080/1359432X.2016.1208652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, S. W., Maynes, T. D., Podsakoff, N. P., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Effects of message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(1), 159–182. doi:10.1037/a0024871.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • World Alliance for Patient Safety (2008). World Health Organizations surgical safety checklist (1. Aufl.). Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2009). Implementation manual WHO surgical safety checklist 2009. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44186/1/9789241598590_eng.pdf. Zugegriffen: 12 October 2016.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Danksagung

Wir danken Sarah Kriech für ihre wertvolle Unterstützung bei der Literaturrecherche.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michaela Kolbe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kolbe, M., Grande, B. „Speaking Up“ statt tödlichem Schweigen im Krankenhaus. Gr Interakt Org 47, 299–311 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-016-0343-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11612-016-0343-5

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation