Skip to main content
Log in

Was ist Partizipative Gesundheitsforschung?

Positionspapier der International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research

What is participatory health research?

A position paper of the international collaboration for participatory health research

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die „International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research“ (ICPHR) ist eine internationale Arbeitsgemeinschaft mit dem Ziel, die Stellung der Partizipativen Gesundheitsforschung (PGF) in der Praxis, Forschung und Politik zu stärken. Die ICPHR setzt ihren Fokus auf die systematische Zusammenführung internationaler Erkenntnisse und Erfahrungen in der Anwendung des partizipativen Forschungsansatzes zur Verbesserung der Gesundheitslage sozial benachteiligter Bevölkerungsgruppen. Sie strebt die Formulierung von gemeinsamen Grundprinzipien, Gütekriterien und Leitlinien für PGF an. Als relativ neuer wissenschaftlicher Ansatz fehlt bisher sowohl für die PGF als auch für andere Formen der Partizipativen Sozialforschung eine allgemeine, international anerkannte Grundlage.

Ziel

In einem ersten Positionspapier definiert die ICPHR die Kernmerkmale der PGF. Dieser Aufsatz stellt die zentralen Aussagen des Papiers vor.

Ergebnis

Die ICPHR versteht PGF nicht als Methode, sondern als eigenständigen wissenschaftlichen Ansatz. Der Ansatz wird anhand von 11 Kernmerkmalen definiert. Die Merkmale beschreiben u. a. den Forschungsprozess, die Methodologie, die erkenntnistheoretische Grundlage und Validitätskriterien.

Abstract

Background

The International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR) has the goal of strengthening the role of Participatory Health Research (PHR) in practice, research and policy. The work of the ICPHR is focused on bringing together systematically the knowledge and experience of PHR in different countries for the purpose of improving the health of disadvantaged communities. The ICPHR is working to develop common principles, guidelines and quality criteria for conducting PHR. As a relatively new research approach, PHR has to this point lacked an internationally recognized definition and scientific basis.

Goal

The first position paper of the ICPHR defines the core features of this approach. This article presents key issues raised in the paper.

Result

The ICPHR understands PGF as being a research approach rather than a research method. The approach is characterized by eleven key criteria. These criteria address such issues as research process, methodology, epistemology and validity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. http://www.icphr.org.

Literatur

  1. Argyris C, Putnam R, Smith D (1985) Action science: concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop R (2005) Freeing ourselves from neo-colonial domination in research. A Kaupapa Maori approach to creating knowledge. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (eds) The sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 109–138

    Google Scholar 

  3. Blackstock KL, Kelly GJ, Horsey BL (2007) Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecol Econ 60(4):726–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chambers R (1981) Rapid rural appraisal–rationale. Discussion Paper 155. Institute of Development Studies, Brighton

  5. Cook T (2009) The purpose of mess in action research: building rigour through a messy turn. Educa Action Res 17(2):277–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooperrider DL, Whitney D (1999) Collaborating for change: appreciative inquiry. Barrett-Koehler Communications, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cornwall A (2008) Unpacking “Participation” models, meanings and practices. Community Dev J 43(3):269–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fetterman DM, Kaftarian SJ, Wandersman A (1995) Empowerment evaluation: knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  9. Freire P (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder & Herder, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Greenwood DJ, Levin M (2006) Introduction to action research: social research for social change. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guba E, Lincoln Y (1989) Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gustavsen B (1992) Dialogue and development. van Gorcum, Assen

    Google Scholar 

  13. Heron J (1996) Co-operative inquiry: research in the human condition. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  14. International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research (ICPHR) (2013) What is Participatory Health Research? Position Paper No. 1; Version February 2013. International Collaboration for Participatory Health Research, Berlin (http://www.icphr.org). Accessed: 31 May 2013

  15. Ismail S (2009) Participatory health research. International Observatory on Health Research Systems. RAND Europe, Cambridge

  16. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, Becker AB (1998) Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health 19:173–202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kemmis S, McTaggart R (1986) The action research planner. Deakin University Press, Geelong

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ledwith M, Springett J (2010) Participatory practice. Community-based action for transformative change. The Policy Press, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lewin K (1948) Resolving social conflicts. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Macquire P (1987) Doing participatory research: a feminist approach. University of Massachusetts, Amherst

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nutbeam D (2000) Health literacy as a public health goal: a challenge for contemporary health education and communication strategies into the 21st Century. Health Promot Int 15(3):259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Park P (2001) Knowledge and participatory research. In: Reason P, Bradbury H (eds) Handbook of action research: participatory inquiry and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 81–90

    Google Scholar 

  23. Reason P, Bradbury H (Hrsg) (2008) Handbook of action research. 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  24. Smithies J, Webster G (1998) Community involvement in health. From passive recipients to active participants. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  25. Staley K (2009) Exploring impact: public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. INVOLVE, Eastleigh

    Google Scholar 

  26. Unger H von (2012) Partizipative Gesundheitsforschung: Wer partizipiert woran? Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung 13(1):7 (http://www.pakomi.de). Zugegriffen: 31. Mai 2013

  27. Wadsworth Y (1998) What is Participatory Research? Action Research International, November (www.scu.edu.au)

  28. Waterman H, Tillen D, Dickson R, Koning K de (2001) Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health Technology Assessment 5:23 (http://www.hta.ac.uk). Accessed: 31 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  29. Whitelaw S, Beattie A, Balogh R, Watson J (2003) A review of the nature of action research. Welsh Assembly Government, Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wright MT (2012) Partizipation in der Praxis: die Herausforderung einer kritisch reflektierten Professionalität. In: Rosenbrock R, Hartung S (Hrsg) Partizipation und Gesundheit. Hans Huber, Bern, S 91–101

    Google Scholar 

  31. Wright MT, Roche B, Unger H von et al (2009) A call for an international collaboration on participatory research for health. Health Promot Int 25(1):115–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wright MT, Unger H von, Block M (2010) Lokales Wissen, lokale Theorie und lokale Evidenz für die Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung. In: Wright MT (Hrsg) Partizipative Qualitätsentwicklung in der Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention. Hans-Huber, Bern, S 53–74

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt.

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael T. Wright LICSW, MS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, M. Was ist Partizipative Gesundheitsforschung?. Präv Gesundheitsf 8, 122–131 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-013-0395-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11553-013-0395-0

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation