Skip to main content
Log in

Home care for the elderly: the role of relatives, friends and neighbors

  • Published:
Review of Economics of the Household Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We use data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe to examine the hours of home care received by the elderly. The existing empirical literature has mostly examined informal home care from children and formal home care. We identify two additional informal home care providers, namely, relatives (other than children) and friends (including neighbors) who provide about 30 % of the hours of informal home care. Our main new empirical finding is that single elderly persons who can rely less on children—and in particular daughters—for their home care receive not only more formal care but also more care from friends and neighbors. These findings suggest that policymakers need to take into account not only home care provision from children but also home care provision from friends and neighbors to obtain accurate projections concerning the increasing costs of formal care programs due to an aging population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. SHARE release 2.5.0. SHARE data collection in 2004–2007 was primarily funded by the European Commission through its 5th and 6th framework programmes (project numbers QLK6-CT-2001- 00360; RII-CT- 2006-062193; CIT5-CT-2005-028857). Additional funding by the US National Institute on Aging (grant numbers U01 AG09740-13S2; P01 AG005842; P01 AG08291; P30 AG12815; Y1-AG-4553-01; OGHA 04-064; R21 AG025169), as well as by various national sources, is gratefully acknowledged (see http://www.share-project.org for a full list of funding institutions).

  2. Information on formal home care is missing for Greece and Switzerland and these two countries are therefore excluded from the analysis (about 14 % of the total sample).

  3. For single elderly we carried out our empirical analysis separately for North (Sweden, Denmark, The Netherlands), Central (Austria, Germany, Belgium, France) and South (Italy, Spain) European countries. Although a separate analysis yields fewer statistically significant results, our main conclusions are by and large the same.

  4. See Byrne et al. (2009) for a structural model of family decisions about the provision of informal, versus formal, care for the elderly.

  5. The Grossman model of health capital has been extended in several ways and not only to include long-term care as an input in the health function. As an example, Anderson and Grossman (2009) clarify the relation between health and human capital accumulation processes, which is crucial for a proper life cycle analysis of household economic decisions.

  6. An alternative is to model the hours of home care from each provider unconditional on receiving home care (see, e.g., Pezzin et al. 2009). Our main conclusions are not affected if we employ this alternative model.

References

  • Anderson, R., & Grossman, M. (2009). Health and the household. Review of Economics of the Household, 7(3), 219–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1976). Altruism, egoism, and genetic fitness: Economics and sociobiology. Journal of Economic Literature, 14(3), 817–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, K., Lindgren, B., & Lundborg, P. (2008a). Informal and formal care among single-living elderly in Europe. Health Economics, 17, 393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolin, K., Lindgren, B., & Lundborg, P. (2008b). Your next of kin or your own career? Caring and working among the 50+ of Europe. Journal of Health Economics, 27, 718–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonsang, E. (2008). Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe? Journal of Health Economics, forthcoming.

  • Byrne, D., Goeree, M. S., Hiedemann, B., & Stern, S. (2009). Formal home health care, informal care, and family decision making. International Economic Review, forthcoming.

  • Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics, methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, F., & Charles, S. (2003). The opportunity costs of informal care: Does gender matter? Journal of Health Economics, 22(5), 781–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, K. K., & Sevak, P. (2005). Can family caregiving substitute for nursing home care? Journal of Health Economics, 24, 1174–1190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comas-Herrera, A., Wittenberg, R., Costa-Font, J., Gori, C., Di Maio, A., Patxot, C., et al. (2006). Future long-term care expenditure in Germany, Spain, Italy and the United States. Ageing & Society, 26, 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa-Font, J., Wittenberg, R., Patxot, C., Comas-Herrera, A., Gori, C., et al. (2007). Projecting long-term care expenditure in four European Union member States: The influence of demographic scenarios. Social Indicators Research, 86(3), 303–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, M. E., & Prince, M. J. (2005). Cognitive function. In A. Börsch-Supan, A. Brugiavini, H. Jürges, J. Mackenbach, J. Siegriest, & G. Weber (Eds.), Health, aging and retirement in Europe: First results from the survey of health, aging and retirement in Europe (pp. 118–125). Mannheim: Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (2008). Europe in FiguresEurostat Yearbook 2008.

  • Fries, J. F. (1980). Aging, natural death, and the compression of morbidity. New England Journal of Medicine, 303, 130–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujisawa, R. & Colombo, F. (2009). The long-term care workforce: Overview and strategies to adapt supply to a growing demand. OECD Health Working Paper No. 44.

  • Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy, 80(2), 223–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hantrais, L. (1999). Socio-demographic change, policy impacts and outcomes in social Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 9, 291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ku, L.-J. E., Stearns, S. C., van Houtven, C. H., & Holmes, G. M. (2012). The health effects of caregiving by grandparents in Taiwan: an instrumental variable estimation. Review of Economics of the Household, forthcoming.

  • Lakdawalla, D., & Philipson, T. (2002). The rise in old-age longevity and the market for long-term care. American Economic Review, 92(1), 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. (2003). The demographic transition: Three centuries of fundamental change. Journal of Econometric Perspectives, 17(4), 167–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzin, L. E., Pollak, R. A., & Schone, B. S. (2009). Long-term care of the disabled elderly: Do children increase caregiving by spouses? Review of Economics of the Household, 7, 323–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezzin, L. E., & Schone, B. S. (1999). Intergenerational household formation, female labor supply and informal caregiving: A bargaining approach. Journal of Human Resources, 34(3), 475–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickard, L., Comas-Herrera, A., Costa-Font, J., Gori, C., Di Maio, A., Patxot, C., et al. (2007). Modelling an entitlement to long-term care services for older people in Europe: Projections for long-term care expenditure to 2050. Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posnett, J., & Jan, S. (1996). Indirect cost in economic evaluation: The opportunity cost of unpaid inputs. Health Economics, 5, 13–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reher, D. S. (1998). Family ties in Western Europe: Persistent contrasts. Population and Development Review, 24(2), 203–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillman, B. C., & Pezzin, L. E. (2000). Potential and active family caregivers: Changing networks and the “Sandwich Generation”. Milbank Quarterly, 78(3), 339–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, S. (1995). Estimating family long-term care decisions in the presence of endogenous child characteristics. Journal of Human Resources, 30(3), 551–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berg, B., Brouwer, W. B. F., & Koopmanschap, M. A. (2004). Economic valuation of informal care. European Journal of Health Economics, 5, 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Houtven, C. H., & Norton, E. C. (2004). Informal care and health care use of older adults. Journal of Health Economics, 23, 1159–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Houtven, C. H., & Norton, E. C. (2008). Informal care and Medicare expenditures: Testing for heterogeneous treatment effects. Journal of Health Economics, 27, 134–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Houtven, C. H., Wilson, M. R., & Clipp, E. C. (2005). Informal care intensity and caregiver drug utilization. Review of Economics of the Household, 3, 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, D. A., & Soldo, B. J. (1994). Married women’s allocation of time to employment and care of elderly parents. Journal of Human Resources, Special Issue: The Family and Intergenerational Relations, 29(4), 1259–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C. W., Moore, M. J., & Clipp, E. C. (2003). Dementia problem behavior and the production of informal caregiving services. Review of Economics of the Household, 1, 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Rob Alessie, Eric Bonsang, Bas van Groezen and the seminar participants at the International SHARE User Conference in Mainz, Germany, Utrecht School of Economics, University of Bologna, RWI Essen, Netspar annual workshop, and the London School of Economics (Workshop on the Future of Family Support for Older People and International Conference on Evidence-based Policy in Long Term Care) for valuable comments and discussion. Financial support has also been provided by Stichting Instituut GAK through the Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement (NETSPAR), the Tjalling Koopmans Institute (Utrecht University), the Short Stay Ph.D. Fellowship of Utrecht University and Farmafactoring Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giacomo Pasini.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 6, 7, 8, and 9.

Table 6 Variable definitions
Table 7 Household characteristics by age
Table 8 Health limitations of the elderly by gender and age
Table 9 Children’s characteristics

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalwij, A., Pasini, G. & Wu, M. Home care for the elderly: the role of relatives, friends and neighbors. Rev Econ Household 12, 379–404 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-012-9159-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-012-9159-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation