Skip to main content
Log in

Causality in qualitative and quantitative research

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We are flooded with a wave of writings on causality in the social sciences during the last decades. The same holds for the relationship between quantitative and qualitative research in the social sciences. An enormous amount of texts appears on (causality in) qualitative research, mostly in a controversy with quantitative research. These writings induced us to develop the thesis of “unity in diversity”, i.e., that there is no difference “in principle” between causality in qualitative and quantitative research, because both are supported by what I will call an “experimental logic”. In developing this thesis a plea is being made for going back to the sources. A historical overview of theories of causality is presented, which develops into two prominent views: INUS-causation and causal realism. A historical framework is also outlined for the opposition between quantitative and qualitative research, in which French positivism and British empiricism are opposed to German neo-kantianism and neo-hegelianism. After having developed the thesis of “unity in diversity” for this historical framework, the same is being done for the recent literature: “mixed methods research”, the book DSI of KKV, the reactions of David Collier and “QCA” of Charles Ragin. At the end the question of small-n research and the case n = 1 is examined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Apostel L.: Matière et forme. Introduction à une épistémologie réaliste. Communication and Cognition, Gent (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle: Metaphysica. Het Wereldvenster, Baarn (1977)

  • Bhaskar R.: A Realist Theory of Science. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar R.: The Possibility of Naturalism. A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. The Harvester Press, Brighton (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Blalock H.M.: Causal Models in the Social Sciences. MacMillan, London (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Braam G.P.A.: Invloed van bedrijven op de overheid, een empirische studie over de verdeling van maatschappelijke invloed. Boom, Meppel (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady H.E., Collier D.: Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Rowman & Littlefield, Berkeley (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge M.: Causality. The Place of the Causal Principle in Modern Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright N.: Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier D., Mahoney J.: Insights and pitfalls: selection bias in qualitative research. World Polit. 49(1), 56–91 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A.: Cours de philosophie positive. Librairie Larousse, Paris (1830–1842)

  • Creswell J.W.: Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin N.K., Lincoln Y.S.: Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M., Collins M.E.: Interracial Housing. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1951)

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein H.: Case study and theory in political science. In: Greenstein, F.I., Polsby, N.W. (eds) Handbook of Political Science, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J.: Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster J.: The Cement of Society. A Study of Social Order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1989b)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B.G., Strauss A.L.: De ontwikkeling van gefundeerde theorie (The Discovery of Grounded Theory). Samson, Alphen a/d Rijn (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthorpe J.H.: On Sociology. Narratives and the Integration of Research and Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré R., Madden E.H.: Causal Powers. A Theory of Natural Necessity. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel C.G.: Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. Collier- MacMillan, London (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume D.: A Treatise of Human Nature. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1739)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D.: Het menselijk inzicht (Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding), vert. J. Kuin. Boom, Meppel 1978 (1748)

  • Hume, D.: Philosophical Essays Concerning Human Understanding (1786) (London, A. Millar, 1748) revised edition (London, M. Cooper, 1751); republished as An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding in Essays and Treatises on Several Subjects (London, A. Millar, Edinburgh, A. Kincaid & A. Donaldson, 1758); republished in 1786

  • Jöreskog, K.G.: A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In: Goldberger, A.S., Duncan, O.D. Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, pp. 85–112. Seminar Press, London (1973)

  • Kant I.: Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Felix Meiner, Hamburg (1781)

    Google Scholar 

  • King G., Keohane R.O., Verba S.: Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn Th.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackie J.: The Cement of the Universe. A Study of Causation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill J.S.: A System of Logic, Ratiocinative and Inductive. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1872)

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Hutchinson, London (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper K.: Objective Knowledge. A Realist View of Logic, Physics and History. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin C.C.: The Comparative Method. Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. University of California Press, Berkeley (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon W.C.: Scientific Explanation and the Causal Structure of the World. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Scriven M.: Explanation and prediction in evolutionary theory. Science 130, 477–482 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suppes P.: A Probabilistic Theory of Causality. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacq J.J.A: Causaliteit in Sociologisch Onderzoek. Een Beoordeling van Causale Analysetechnieken in het Licht van Wijsgerige Opvattingen over Causaliteit. Van Loghum Slaterus, Deventer (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tacq J.J.A.: Het methodologisch atelier. Adviezen en beschouwingen voor de sociale wetenschappen. Acco, Leuven (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori A., Teddlie C.: Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, W.I., Znaniecki, F.: The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Gorham Press, Boston (1918–1920)

  • van den Braembussche A.: Theorie van de maatschappijgeschiedenis. Ambo, Baarn (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Parijs Ph.: Théorie des catastrophes et materialisme historique. Revue française de sociologie 19, 195–220 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, edited by D.F Pears. Routledge, London (1981)

  • Wittgenstein, L.: Philosophical Investigations (tr. G.E.M. Anscombe). Prentice Hall, New York (1999)

  • Wright S.: The method of path coefficients. Ann. Math. Stat. 5, 161–215 (1934)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Znaniecki, F.: The Method of Sociology. Octagon, New York (1934), reprinted in 1962

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacques Tacq.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tacq, J. Causality in qualitative and quantitative research. Qual Quant 45, 263–291 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9293-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9293-0

Keywords

Navigation