Skip to main content
Log in

Patient autonomy: A view from the kitchen

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In contemporary liberal ethics patient autonomy is often interpreted as the right to self-determination: when it comes to treatment decisions, the patient is given the right to give or withhold informed consent. This paper joins in the philosophical and ethical criticism of the liberal interpretation as it does not regard patient autonomy as a right, rule or principle, but rather as a practice. Patient autonomy, or so I will argue, is realised in the concrete activities of day-to-day health care, in the material and technological context of care, in arrangements of health care institutions, in the physical training of people with disabilities, as well as in the concrete activities of care-giving. This move from conversations in the consultation room to other sites and situations in the practice of care takes seriously the empirical reality of medical care and intends to show that patient autonomy is practically realised in a much richer and more creative way than most ethical theory seems to assume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • G.J. Agich (1993) Autonomy and Long-term Care Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht, G.L., K.D. Seelman and M. Bury (eds.): 2001, Handbook of Disability Studies. Thousand Oaks.

  • A. Baier (1994) Moral Prejudices: Essays on Ethics Harvard University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • T.L. Beauchamp J.F. Childress (1979) Principles of Biomedical Ethics Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Callon J. Law (1997) ArticleTitle‘After the Individual in Society: Lessons on Collectivity from Science, Technology and Society.’ Canadian Journal of Sociology 22 165–182

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Conradi N. Biller-Andorno M. Boos C. Sommer C. Wiesemann (2003) ArticleTitle‘Gender in Medical Ethics: Re-examining the Conceptual Basis of Empirical Research’ Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Dahl Rendtorff (2002) ArticleTitle‘Basic Ethical Principles in European Bioethics and Biolaw: Autonomy, Dignity, Integrity and Vulnerability–Towards a Foundation of bioethics and biolaw’ Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 235–244

    Google Scholar 

  • De Beaufort, I.D. and H.M. Dupuis (eds.): 1988, Handboek gezondheidsethiek. Assen.

  • A. Donchin (1995) ArticleTitle‘Reworking Autonomy: Toward a Feminist Perspective’ Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 44–55 Occurrence Handle7627365

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • H.M. Dupuis I.D. Beaufort ParticleDe E. Does ParticleVan der M.T. Hilhorst B. Themans J.G.M. Aartsen (1994) Wat zou u doen? Medisch-ethische casuïstiete met commentaren (What Would You Do? Cases from Medical Ethics with Comments) Bohn, Stafleu & Van Loghum Houten

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Dworkin (1988) The Theory and Practice of Autonomy Cambridge University Press Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.R. Faden T.L. Beauchamp (1986) A History and Theory of Informed Consent Oxford University Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Gomart A. Hennion (1999) A Sociology of Attachment: Music Amateurs, Drug Users J. Law J. Hassard (Eds) Actor Network Theory and After Blackwell Publishers Oxford 220–247

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Harbers A. Mol A. Stollmeyer (2002) ArticleTitle‘Food Matters: Arguments for an Ethnography of Daily Care’, Theory Culture and Society 19 207–226 Occurrence Handle10.1177/026327602761899228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Keller (1997) ArticleTitle‘Autonomy, Relationality, and Feminist Ethics’ Hypatia 12 152–164

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Lelie (1999) Ethiek en nefrologie: Een empirisch-ethisch onderzoek (Ethics and Nephrology: An Inquiry from Empirical Ethics) Damon Leende

    Google Scholar 

  • A. MacIntyre (1981) After Virtue University of Notre Dame Press Notre Dame, Indiana

    Google Scholar 

  • Manschot, H.A.M.: 1994, ‘Kwetsbare autonomie? Over afhankelijkheid en onafhankelijkheid in de ethiek van de zorg’, in: H.A.M. Manschot and M. Verkerk (eds.). Amsterdam: Boom, pp. 97–118.

  • A. Mol J. Mesman (1996) ArticleTitle‘Neonatal Food and the Politics of Theory: Some Questions on Method’ Social Studies of Science 26 419–444

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Moser J. Law (1999) Good Passages, Bad Passages J. Law J. Hassard (Eds) Actor Network Theory and After Blackwell Publishers Oxford 196–219

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A.C.J. Potting (2001) Van je familie. . : Zorg, familie en sekse in de mantelzorg (Care, Family and Gender in Volunteer Aid) Aksant Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Schermer (2002) The Different Faces of Autonomy: Patient Autonomy in Ethical Theory and Hospital Practice Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • M.-J.E.H. Smits (2004) Zorgen voor een draaglijk bestaan: Morele ervaringen van verpleegkundigen (Moral Experiences of Nurses) Aksant Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • T.E. Swierstra (2002) ArticleTitle‘Ethiek op zijn plaats zetten: Normatieve ethiek als empirische filosofie (Ethics in its Place: Normative Ethics as Empirical Philosophy)’ Krisis: Tijdschrift voor empirische filosofie 3 18–38

    Google Scholar 

  • H.A.M.J. Ten Have (1998) ArticleTitle‘Editorial: Philosophy of Medicine and Health Care - European Perspectives’ Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  • J.C. Tronto (1993) Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care Routledge New York

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. Verkerk (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Care Perspective and Autonomy’ Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 289–294

    Google Scholar 

  • G.A.M. Widdershoven (2000) Ethiek in de kliniek: Hedendaagse benaderingen in de gezondheidsethiek (Ethics in the Clinic: Contemporary Approaches in Health Care Ethics) Boom Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita M. Struhkamp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Struhkamp, R.M. Patient autonomy: A view from the kitchen. Med Health Care Philos 8, 105–114 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-004-1134-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-004-1134-2

Keywords

Navigation