Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Incidental findings in emergency imaging: frequency, recommendations, and compliance with consensus guidelines

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of incidental findings (IFs) in emergency department (ED) imaging reports and evaluate the adherence of imaging recommendations to consensus societal guidelines for IFs. A retrospective review of consecutive ED computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) reports from two university-affiliated EDs over a 2-month period was performed. Each imaging report was reviewed in its entirety, and incidental findings were documented along with recommendations for additional imaging. Imaging recommendations were compared to published societal guidelines from the American College of Radiology (ACR) and Fleischner Society. Three thousand one hundred thirty-one total cases consisting of 1967 CTs and 1164 US contained 514 incidental findings (16.4 %), with 329 CT IFs (64 %) and 185 US IFs (36 %). The ovary was the most common organ for an IF (n = 214, 42 %). Of all IFs, 347 (67.5 %) recommendations were concordant with societal guidelines and 167 (32.5 %) were discordant. 39.8 % of CT recommendations were discordant, while 19.5 % of US recommendations were discordant (p < 0.0001). Incidental findings are commonly encountered in the emergent setting. Variable adherence to societal guidelines is noted. Targeted radiologist education and technological solutions may decrease rates of discordance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ding A, Eisenberg JD, Pandharipande PV (2011) The economic burden of incidentally detected findings. Radiol Clin North Am 49(2):257–265. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2010.11.004

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Lumbreras B, Donat L, Hernandez-Aguado I (2010) Incidental findings in imaging diagnostic tests: a systematic review. Br J Radiol 83(988):276–289. doi:10.1259/bjr/98067945

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall WB, Truitt SG, Scheunemann LP, Shah SA, Rivera MP, Parker LA et al (2009) The prevalence of clinically relevant incidental findings on chest computed tomographic angiograms ordered to diagnose pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 169(21):1961–1965. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Heller MT, Harisinghani M, Neitlich JD, Yeghiayan P, Berland LL (2013) Managing incidental findings on abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI, part 3: white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee II on splenic and nodal findings. J Am Coll Radiol 10(11):833–839. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.05.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Khosa F, Krinsky G, Macari M, Yucel EK, Berland LL (2013) Managing incidental findings on abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI, Part 2: white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee II on vascular findings. J Am Coll Radiol 10(10):789–794. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.05.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Patel MD, Ascher SM, Paspulati RM, Shanbhogue AK, Siegelman ES, Stein MW et al (2013) Managing incidental findings on abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI, part 1: white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee II on adnexal findings. J Am Coll Radiol 10(9):675–681. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.05.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sebastian S, Araujo C, Neitlich JD, Berland LL (2013) Managing incidental findings on abdominal and pelvic CT and MRI, part 4: white paper of the ACR Incidental Findings Committee II on gallbladder and biliary findings. J Am Coll Radiol 10(12):953–956. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.05.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berland LL (2011) The American College of Radiology strategy for managing incidental findings on abdominal computed tomography. Radiol Clin North Am 49(2):237–243. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2010.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, Herold CJ, Jett JR, Naidich DP et al (2005) Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237(2):395–400. doi:10.1148/radiol.2372041887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenberg RL, Bankier AA, Boiselle PM (2010) Compliance with Fleischner Society guidelines for management of small lung nodules: a survey of 834 radiologists. Radiology 255(1):218–224. doi:10.1148/radiol.09091556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lehnert BE, Sandstrom CK, Gross JA, Dighe M, Linnau KF (2014) Variability in management recommendations for incidental thyroid nodules detected on CT of the cervical spine in the emergency department. J Am Coll Radiol 11(7):681–685. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.12.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Masciocchi M, Wagner B, Lloyd B (2012) Quality review: Fleischner criteria adherence by radiologists in a large community hospital. J Am Coll Radiol 9(5):336–339. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2011.12.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenkrantz A, Matze B, Foran M, McMenamy J (2013) Recommendations for additional imaging on emergency department CT examinations: comparison of emergency- and organ-based subspecialty radiologists. Emergency Radiology 20:149–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Niska R, Bhuiya F, Xu J. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2007 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2010(26):1-31

  15. Hoang JK, Langer JE, Middleton WD, Wu CC, Hammers LW, Cronan JJ et al (2015) Managing incidental thyroid nodules detected on imaging: white paper of the ACR Incidental Thyroid Findings Committee. J Am Coll Radiol 12(2):143–150. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.09.038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Messersmith WA, Brown DF, Barry MJ (2001) The prevalence and implications of incidental findings on ED abdominal CT scans. Am J Emerg Med 19(6):479–481. doi:10.1053/ajem.2001.27137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lehman SJ, Abbara S, Cury RC, Nagurney JT, Hsu J, Goela A et al (2009) Significance of cardiac computed tomography incidental findings in acute chest pain. Am J Med 122(6):543–549. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.10.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly ME, Heeney A, Redmond CE, Costelloe J, Nason GJ, Ryan J et al (2015) Incidental findings detected on emergency abdominal CT scans: a 1-year review. Abdominal imaging 40(6):1853–1857. doi:10.1007/s00261-015-0349-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thompson RJ, Wojcik SM, Grant WD, Ko PY (2011) Incidental findings on CT scans in the emergency department. Emerg Med Int 2011:624847. doi:10.1155/2011/624847

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ekeh AP, Walusimbi M, Brigham E, Woods RJ, McCarthy MC (2010) The prevalence of incidental findings on abdominal computed tomography scans of trauma patients. J Emerg Med 38(4):484–489. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.11.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Munk MD, Peitzman AB, Hostler DP, Wolfson AB (2010) Frequency and follow-up of incidental findings on trauma computed tomography scans: experience at a level one trauma center. J Emerg Med 38(3):346–350. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2008.01.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Paluska TR, Sise MJ, Sack DI, Sise CB, Egan MC, Biondi M (2007) Incidental CT findings in trauma patients: incidence and implications for care of the injured. J Trauma 62(1):157–161. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000249129.63550.cc

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barrett TW, Schierling M, Zhou C, Colfax JD, Russ S, Conatser P et al (2009) Prevalence of incidental findings in trauma patients detected by computed tomography imaging. Am J Emerg Med 27(4):428–435. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2008.03.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tang N, Stein J, Hsia RY, Maselli JH, Gonzales R (2010) Trends and characteristics of US emergency department visits, 1997-2007. JAMA 304(6):664–670. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Broder J, Warshauer DM (2006) Increasing utilization of computed tomography in the adult emergency department, 2000-2005. Emerg Radiol 13(1):25–30. doi:10.1007/s10140-006-0493-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Larson DB, Johnson LW, Schnell BM, Salisbury SR, Forman HP (2011) National trends in CT use in the emergency department: 1995-2007. Radiology 258(1):164–173. doi:10.1148/radiol.10100640

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rao VM, Levin DC, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Sunshine JH (2011) Trends in utilization rates of the various imaging modalities in emergency departments: nationwide Medicare data from 2000 to 2008. J Am Coll Radiol 8(10):706–709. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2011.04.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kirschner J, Shah K, Runde D, Newman D, Godbout B, Wiener D et al (2014) Patterns in computed tomography utilization among emergency physicians in an urban, academic emergency department. Emerg Radiol 21(6):577–581. doi:10.1007/s10140-014-1237-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Pinheiro LW, McKenney KL, Rivas L, Nunez DB, Yu M, Harris JP (2000) Incidental findings on trauma ultrasonography. Emergency Radiology 7(1):19–24. doi:10.1007/s101400050005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson P, Horton K, Megibow A, Jeffery R, Fishman E (2011) Common incidental findings on MDCT: survey of radiologist recommendations for patient management. Journal of the American College of Radiology 8:762–767

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shuaib W, Vijayasarathi A, Johnson JO, Salastekar N, He Q, Maddu KK et al (2014) Factors affecting patient compliance in the acute setting: an analysis of 20,000 imaging reports. Emerg Radiol 21(4):373–379. doi:10.1007/s10140-014-1209-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Berland LL, Silverman SG, Megibow AJ, Mayo-Smith WW (2014) ACR members’ response to JACR white paper on the management of incidental abdominal CT findings. J Am Coll Radiol 11(1):30–35. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2013.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Brook OR, Beddy P, Pahade J, Couto C, Brennan I, Patel P et al (2015) Delayed growth in incidental pancreatic cysts: are the current American College of Radiology Recommendations for follow-up appropriate? Radiology 140972. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015140972

  34. Flicker MS, Tsoukas AT, Hazra A, Dachman AH (2008) Economic impact of extracolonic findings at computed tomographic colonography. Journal of computer assisted tomography 32(4):497–503. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181692091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kucharczyk MJ, Menezes RJ, McGregor A, Paul NS, Roberts HC (2011) Assessing the impact of incidental findings in a lung cancer screening study by using low-dose computed tomography. Can Assoc Radiol J 62(2):141–145. doi:10.1016/j.carj.2010.02.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Xiong T, McEvoy K, Morton DG, Halligan S, Lilford RJ (2006) Resources and costs associated with incidental extracolonic findings from CT colonography: a study in a symptomatic population. Br J Radiol 79(948):948–961. doi:10.1259/bjr/58438178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Wilson LA, Maccarty RL, Welch TJ, Vanness DJ et al (2003) Extracolonic findings at CT colonography: evaluation of prevalence and cost in a screening population. Gastroenterology 124(4):911–916. doi:10.1053/gast.2003.50158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ (2000) Incidental extracolonic findings at CT colonography. Radiology 215(2):353–357. doi:10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ap33353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kimberly JR, Phillips KC, Santago P, Perumpillichira J, Bechtold R, Pineau B et al (2009) Extracolonic findings at virtual colonoscopy: an important consideration in asymptomatic colorectal cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 24(1):69–73. doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0835-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Veerappan GR, Ally MR, Choi JH, Pak JS, Maydonovitch C, Wong RK (2010) Extracolonic findings on CT colonography increases yield of colorectal cancer screening. AJR American Journal of Roentgenology 195(3):677–686. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Brown SD (2013) Professional norms regarding how radiologists handle incidental findings. J Am Coll Radiol 10(4):253–257. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2012.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Berlin L (2011) The incidentaloma: a medicolegal dilemma. Radiol Clin North Am 49(2):245–255. doi:10.1016/j.rcl.2010.11.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Emergency Radiology, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 550 Peachtree Road, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA

    Tarek N. Hanna, Haris Shekhani, Matthew E. Zygmont & Jamlik-Omari Johnson

  2. Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA

    James Matthew Kerchberger

Authors
  1. Tarek N. Hanna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haris Shekhani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew E. Zygmont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James Matthew Kerchberger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jamlik-Omari Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tarek N. Hanna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Disclosures

No disclosures on behalf of any authors. This manuscript will not be submitted or published elsewhere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanna, T.N., Shekhani, H., Zygmont, M.E. et al. Incidental findings in emergency imaging: frequency, recommendations, and compliance with consensus guidelines. Emerg Radiol 23, 169–174 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-016-1378-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-016-1378-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation