Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: acceptability and objection aspects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Smart homes equipped with ambient intelligence technology constitute a promising direction to enable the growing number of elderly to continue to live in their own home as long as possible. However, this calls for technological solutions that suit their specific needs and capabilities. The Sweet-Home project aims at developing a new user friendly technology for home automation based on voice command. This paper reports a user evaluation assessing the acceptance and fear of this new technology. Eight healthy persons between 71 and 88 years old, 7 relatives (child, grandchild or friend) and 3 professional carers participated in a user evaluation. During about 45 min, the persons were questioned in co-discovery in the Domus smart home alternating between interview and wizard of Oz periods followed by a debriefing. The experience aimed at testing four important aspects of the project: voice command, communication with the outside world, domotics system interrupting a person’s activity, and electronic agenda. Voice interface appeared to have a great potential to ease daily living for elderly and frail persons and would be better accepted than more intrusive solutions. By considering still healthy and independent elderly people in the user evaluation, an interesting finding that came up is their overall acceptance provided the system does not drive them to a lazy lifestyle by taking control of everything. This particular fear must be addressed for the development of smart homes that support daily living by giving them more ability to control rather than putting them away from the daily routine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www.tiresias.org.

  2. http://sweet-home.imag.fr/.

  3. http://www.technosens.fr.

  4. http://camera-contact.com.

  5. http://www.knx.org.

References

  1. Augusto JC (2009) Past, present and future of ambient intelligence and smart environments. In: ICAART, pp 11–18

  2. Baba A, Yoshizawa S, Yamada M, Lee A, Shikano K (2004) Acoustic models of the elderly for large-vocabulary continuous speech recognition. Electron Commun Jpn Part 2 87(7):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Badii A, Boudy J (2009) CompanionAble—integrated cognitive assistive & domotic companion robotic systems for ability & security. In: 1’st Congres of the Société Française des Technologies pour lAutonomie et de Gérontechnologie (SFTAG’09), Troyes, pp 18–20

  4. Bahadori S, Cesta A, Grisetti G, Iocchi L, Leone R, Nardi D, Oddi A, Pecora F, Rasconi R (2004) RoboCare: pervasive intelligence for the domestic care of the elderly. Intell Artif 1(1):16–21

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bender BG, Apter A, Bogen DK, Dickinson P, Fisher L, Wamboldt FS, Westfall JM (2010) Test of an interactive voice response intervention to improve adherence to controller medications in adults with asthma. J Am Board Family Med 23(2):159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blanpain N, Chardon O (2010) Projections de population à l’horizon 2060: Un tiers de la population âgé de plus de 60 ans. Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (France) [in French]

  7. Callejas Z, López-Cózar R (2009) Designing smart home interfaces for the elderly. SIGACCESS Newslett 95

  8. Chahuara P, Portet F, Vacher M (2011) Location of an inhabitant for domotic assistance through fusion of audio and non-visual data. In: Proceedings of pervasive health, Dublin, Ireland

  9. Chan M, Campo E, Estève D, Fourniols JY (2009) Smart homes—current features and future perspectives. Maturitas 64(2):90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Demiris G, Rantz M, Aud M, Marek K, Tyrer H, Skubic M, Hussam A (2004) Older adults’ attitudes towards and perceptions of “smart home” technologies: a pilot study. Med Inform Internet Med 29(2):87–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Edwards W, Grinter R (2001) At home with ubiquitous computing: seven challenges. In: Abowd G, Brumitt B, Shafer S (eds) Ubicomp 2001: ubiquitous computing. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 2201. Springer, Berlin, pp 256–272

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Filho G, Moir TJ (2010) From science fiction to science fact: a smart-house interface using speech technology and a photo-realistic avatar. Int J Comput Appl Technol 39(8):32–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fleury A, Vacher M, Noury N (2010) SVM-based multi-modal classification of activities of daily living in health smart homes: sensors, algorithms and first experimental results. IEEE Trans Inform Technol Biomed 14(2):274–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fugger E, Prazak B, Hanke S, Wassertheurer S (2007) Requirements and ethical issues for sensor-augmented environments in elderly care. In: 4th International conference on universal access in human-computer interaction, pp 887–893

  15. Gödde F, Möller S, Engelbrecht KP, Kühnel C, Schleicher R, Naumann A, Wolters M (2008) Study of a speech-based smart home system with older users. In: International workshop on intelligent user interfaces for ambient assisted living, pp 17–22

  16. Gordon M (1993) Community care for the elderly: is it really better?. Can Med Assoc J 148:393–396

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hagras H, Doctor F, Lopez A, Callaghan V (2007) An incremental adaptive life long learning approach for type-2 fuzzy embedded agents in ambient intelligent environments. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(1):41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamill M, Young V, Boger J, Mihailidis A (2009) Development of an automated speech recognition interface for personal emergency response systems. J NeuroEng Rehabil 6

  19. Hornbrook M, Stevens V, Wingfield D, Hollis J, Greenlick M, Ory M (1994) Preventing falls among community-dwelling older persons: results from a randomized trial. Gerontologist 34(1):16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Intille SS (2002) Designing a home of the future. IEEE Pervas Comput 1(2):76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Istrate D, Vacher M, Serignat JF (2008) Embedded implementation of distress situation identification through sound analysis. J Inf Technol Healthcare 6:204–211

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jaimes A, Sebe N, Gatica-Perez D (2006) Human-centered computing: a multimedia perspective. In: MULTIMEDIA ’06: proceedings of the 14th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia. ACM, New York, pp 855–864

  23. Jambon F (2011) Human-computer interaction and innovation in handheld, mobile and wearable technologies. IGI Global 155–171

  24. Kang MS, Kim KM, Kim HC (2006) A questionnaire study for the design of smart home for the elderly. In: Healthcom, pp 265–268

  25. Keshavarz A, Tabar AM, Aghajan H (2006) Distributed vision-based reasoning for smart home care. In: ACM SenSys workshop on distributed smart cameras

  26. Kjeldskov J, Skov MB (2007) Studying usability in sitro: simulating real world phenomena in controlled environments. Int J Hum Comput Interact 22(1&2):7–36

    Google Scholar 

  27. Koskela T, Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila K (2004) Evolution towards smart home environments: empirical evaluation of three user interfaces. Personal Ubiquitous Comput 8:234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Le XHB, Di Mascolo M, Gouin A, Noury N (2008) Health smart home for elders a tool for automatic recognition of activities of daily living. In: Proceedings of the 30th annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society, EMBC, Vancouver, p. 10

  29. Lecouteux B, Vacher M, Portet F (2011) Distant speech recognition in a smart home: comparison of several multisource ASRs in realistic conditions. In: Interspeech 2011, Florence, pp 2273–2276

  30. Lines L, Hone KS (2006) Multiple voices, multiple choices: older adults’ evaluation of speech output to support independent living. Gerontechnol J 5(2):78–91

    Google Scholar 

  31. López-Cózar R, Callejas Z (2010) Multimodal dialogue for ambient intelligence and smart environments. In: Nakashima H, Aghajan H, Augusto JC (eds) Handbook of ambient intelligence and smart environments. Springer, USA, pp 559–579

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Marek K, Rantz M (2000) Aging in place: a new model for long-term care. Nurs Admin Q 24(3):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  33. Moncrieff S, Venkatesh S, West GAW (2007) Dynamic privacy in a smart house environment. In: IEEE Multimedia and Expo, pp 2034–2037

  34. Mozer MC (2005) Smart environments: technologies, protocols, and applications. Wiley, London

  35. Mäyär F, Soronen A, Vanhala J, Mikkonen J, Zakrzewski M, Koskinen I, Kuusela K (2006) Probing a proactive home: challenges in researching and designing everyday smart environments. Hum Technol 2:158–186

    Google Scholar 

  36. Noury N, Rumeau P, Bourke A, ÓLaighin G, Lundy J (2008) A proposal for the classification and evaluation of fall detectors. IRBM 29(6):340–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Popescu M, Li Y, Skubic M, Rantz M (2008) An acoustic fall detector system that uses sound height information to reduce the false alarm rate. In: Proceedings of 30th annual international of conference of the IEEE-EMBS 2008, pp 4628–4631

  38. Rantz M, Porter R, Cheshier D, Otto D, Servey C, Johnson R, Aud M, Skubic M, Tyrer H, He Z, Demiris G, Alexander G, Taylor G (2008) TigerPlace, a State-Academic-Private project to revolutionize traditional Long-Term care. J Housing Elderly 22(1):66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Reidel K, Tamblyn R, Patel V, Huang A (2008) Pilot study of an interactive voice response system to improve medication refill compliance. BMC Med Inform Decis Making 8:46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Rialle V, Noury FDN, Bajolle L, Demongeot J (2002) Health “smart” home: information technology for patients at home. Telemed J E Health 8(4):395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rialle V, Ollivet C, Guigui C, Hervé C (2008) What do family caregivers of alzheimers disease patients desire in smart home technologies? Contrasted results of a wide survey. Methods Inf Med 47(1):63–69

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rodin J (1986) Aging and health: effects of the sense of control. Science 233(4770):1271–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rougui J, Istrate D, Souidene W (2009) Audio sound event identification for distress situations and context awareness. In: 31st Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC’09). Minneapolis, USA, pp 3501–3504

  44. Slavk P, Nêmec V, Sporka A (2005) Speech based user interface for users with special needs. In: Matoušek V, Mautner P, Pavelka T (eds) Text, speech and dialogue, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3658. Springer, Berlin, pp 743–743

    Google Scholar 

  45. Syndicat National des Professionnels Infirmiers: Délires technologiques: les “robots infirmiers”. http://www.syndicat-infirmier.com/Delires-technologiques-les-robots.html (2007). [in French]

  46. Szecsi T, Mamun K, Hasan K, Islam A, Griffin C, Hoque M (2008) Hospital robot module development in the iward project. In: 6th CIRP international conference on intelligent computation in manufacturing engineering (CIRP ICME ’08), Naples, Italy

  47. Vacher M, Fleury A, Portet F, Serignat JF, Noury N (2010) Complete sound and speech recognition system for health smart homes: application to the recognition of activities of daily living, Intech Book, pp 645–673

  48. Vacher M, Istrate D, Portet F, Joubert T, Chevalier T, Smidtas S, Meillon B, Lecouteux B, Sehili M, Chahuara P, Mniard S (2011) The sweet-home project: audio technology in smart homes to improve well-being and reliance. In: 33rd Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC’11), p. 4

  49. Vacher M, Portet F, Fleury A, Noury N (2011) Development of audio sensing technology for ambient assisted living: applications and challenges. Int J E-Health Med Commun 2(1):35–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Weiser M (1991) The computer for the 21st century. Scientif Am 265(3):66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zajicek M (2001) Interface design for older adults. In: WUAUC’01: proceedings of the 2001 EC/NSF workshop on Universal accessibility of ubiquitous computing. ACM, New York, pp 60–65

  52. Ziefle M, Wilkowska W (2010) Technology acceptability for medical assistance. Pervas Health

  53. Zouba N, Bremond F, Thonnat M, Anfosso A, Pascual E, Mallea P, Mailland V, Guerin O (2009) A computer system to monitor older adults at home: preliminary results. Gerontechnol J 8(3):129–139

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the participants (seniors, relatives and carers) who accepted to perform this experiment and kindly gave their time and Nicolas Bonnefond for being such a good wizard. Thanks are extended to Thierry Chevalier for his help in defining the protocol and to our reviewer for checking the English of the early draft. This work is supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-09-VERS-011).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire d’Informatique de Grenoble UMR 5217, UJF-Grenoble 1/Grenoble-INP /UPMF-Grenoble 2/CNRS, 38041, Grenoble, France

    François Portet, Michel Vacher & Brigitte Meillon

  2. MULTICOM, Floralis - UJF Filiale, 6, allée de Bethléem, 38610, Gières, France

    Caroline Golanski & Camille Roux

Authors
  1. François Portet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michel Vacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Caroline Golanski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Camille Roux
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Brigitte Meillon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to François Portet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Portet, F., Vacher, M., Golanski, C. et al. Design and evaluation of a smart home voice interface for the elderly: acceptability and objection aspects. Pers Ubiquit Comput 17, 127–144 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0470-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0470-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation