Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fantoni translaryngeal tracheostomy versus ciaglia blue rhino percutaneous tracheostomy: A retrospective comparison

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the operative technique and complications of the Fantoni tracheostomy (TLT) with those of the Ciaglia Blue Rhino tracheostomy (CBR). We also compared the costs of mini-invasive tracheostomy with those of surgical tracheostomy (ST).

Methods

Between January 1998 and January 2006, 530 patients needed emergency intubation and protracted assisted ventilation in our department. We performed 470 mini-invasive tracheostomies: as TLT in 350 and as CBR in 120. The time between intubation and tracheostomy was 4 ± 1 days. Interventions were carried out in our intensive care unit (ICU).

Results

One hundred and nine patients died within 20 ± 5 days of intervention, but 361 are still alive after 100 ± 3 months. TLT and CBR complications were independent of the operative technique (P = 0.74, r = 0.285 vs P = 0.61, r = 0.271) or procedure time (P = 0.95, r = 0.297 vs P = 0.92, r = 0.295). Ciaglia Blue Rhino tracheostomy was noted to have a cost-benefit advantage over TLT and ST (P = 0.0002, P = 0.009, P = 0.22, respectively). The average time until decannulation was 20 ± 1 days.

Conclusions

Mini-invasive tracheostomies are easy, safe, and fast. Ciaglia Blue Rhino tracheostomy took less time to perform and had fewer complications than TLT, because the technique was simpler.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ciaglia P, Firshing R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A new simple bedside procedure: preliminary report. Chest 1985;87:715–719.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Griggs WM, Worthley LI, Gilligan JE, Thomas PD, Myburg JA. A simple percutaneous tracheostomy technique. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990;170:543–545.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fantoni A, Ripamonti D. A non-derivative, non-surgical tracheostomy: the translaryngeal method. Intensive Care Med 1997;23:386–392.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciaglia P. Technique, complications, and improvements in percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Chest 1999;115:1229–1230.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Divisi D, Altamura G, Battaglia C, Di Francescantonio W, Rosa E, Torresini G, et al. La trachéotomie translaryngée selon la tecnique de Fantoni: à propos de 104 observations. Ann Chir 2002;127:130–137.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Velmahos GC, Gomez H, Boicey CM, Demetriades D. Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy: prospective evaluation of a modifi cation of the current technique in 100 patients. World J Surg 2000;24:1109–1115.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kost KM. Percutaneous tracheostomy: comparison of Ciaglia and Griggs techniques. Crit Care 2000;4:143–146.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hinerman R, Alvarez F, Keller CA. Outcome of bedside percutaneous tracheostomy with bronchoscopic guidance. Intensive Care Med 2000;26:1850–1856.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Byhahn C, Wilke HJ, Lischke V, Rinne T, Westphal K. Bedside percutaneous tracheostomy: clinical comparison of Griggs and Fantoni techniques. World J Surg 2001;25:296–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sheu CC, Tsai JR, Hung JY, Cheng MH, Chong IW, Hwang JJ, et al. A simple modification of Ciaglia Blue Rhino technique for tracheostomy: using a guidewire dilating forceps for initial dilation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2007;31:114–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cantais E, Kaiser E, Le-Goff Y, Palmier B. Percutaneous tracheostomy: prospective comparison of the translaryngeal technique versus the forceps-dilational technique in 100 critically ill adults. Crit Care Med 2002;30:815–819.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anon JM, Escuela MP, Gomez V, Moreno A, Lopez J, Diaz R, et al. Percutaneous tracheostomy: Ciaglia Blue Rhino versus Griggs’ guide wire dilating forceps. A prospective randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2004;48:451–456.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ambesh SP, Pandey CK, Srivastava S, Agarwal A, Singh DK. Percutaneous tracheostomy with single dilatation technique: a prospective, randomized comparison of Ciaglia Blue Rhino versus Griggs’ guidewire dilating forceps. Anesth Analg 2002;95:1739–1745.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Byhahn C, Wilke HJ, Halbig S, Lischke V, Westphal K. Percutaneous tracheostomy: Ciaglia Blue Rhino versus the basic Ciaglia technique of percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Anesth Analg 2000;91:882–886.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Johnson JL, Cheatham ML, Sagraves SG, Block EF, Nelson LD. Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy: a comparison of single-versus multiple-dilator techniques. Crit Care Med 2001;29:1251–1254.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fikkers BG, Staatsen M, Lardenoije SG. Comparison of two percutaneous tracheostomy techniques, guide wire dilating forceps and Ciaglia Blue Rhino: a sequential cohort study. Crit Care 2004;8:R299–R305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Teoh N, Parr MJ, Finfer SR. Bacteriemia following percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Anaesth Intensive Care 1997;25:354–357.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobs S, Al Rasheed AM, Abdulsamat W, Al Barrak A, Al Omer NF, Tjan D, et al. Effects of a simple protocol on infective complications in intensive care unit patients undergoing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. Respir Care 2003;48:29–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cobean R, Beals M, Moss C, Bredenberg CE. Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy. A safe, cost-effective bedside procedure. Arch Surg 1996;131:265–271.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bowen CPR, Whitney LR, Truwit JD, Durbin CG, Moore MM. Comparison of safety and cost of percutaneous versus surgical tracheostomy. Am Surg 2001;67:54–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Grover A, Robbins J, Bendick P, Gibson M, Villalba M. Open versus percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: efficacy and cost analysis. Am Surg 2001;67:297–302.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Divisi, D., Altamura, G., Di Tommaso, S. et al. Fantoni translaryngeal tracheostomy versus ciaglia blue rhino percutaneous tracheostomy: A retrospective comparison. Surg Today 39, 387–392 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3899-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-008-3899-z

Key words

Navigation