Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of prehospital endotracheal intubation performed by emergency physicians: retrospective survey of a single emergency medical center in Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Advanced airway management in the prehospital setting is a serious issue in Japan because emergency medical technicians are not authorized to perform such management, whereas physicians—who are authorized to perform advanced airway management—do not usually engage in prehospital emergency medical activity. The purpose of this investigation was to investigate the success rate for endotracheal intubation (ETI) procedures and other methods of airway management employed by physicians in the prehospital setting in a single institution, as well as to examine the risk factors associated with difficult or failed endotracheal intubation (D/F ETI).

Methods

We performed a retrospective survey of patients treated in the prehospital setting by emergency physicians of the Hyogo Emergency Medical Center from 2004 to 2011. Patients were divided into two groups: a cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) group and a non-CPA group. Data on cases of D/F ETI were obtained, and risk factors for these two groups were identified using univariate and statistical analysis.

Results

During the investigation period, ETI was attempted in the prehospital setting on 742 eligible patients; in 30 (4.04 %) of these cases, the attempts at ETI proved difficult or failed. Of those 30 patients, 13 patients received a surgical airway (attempts to provide a surgical airway failed in two patients), a blind ETI was performed in four, a video-assisted airway device was used in another four, and esophageal intubation was performed in four patients. Bag-valve ventilation alone was performed in one patient. The incidence of D/F ETI was higher in the non-CPA group than in the CPA group (6.27 vs. 2.63 %: p < 0.05). Facial or neck injury was a risk factor for D/F ETI in the prehospital setting in the CPA group (odds ratio 7.855; 95 % CI 1.754–36.293: p = 0.042). On the other hand, no risk factors for D/F ETI in the prehospital setting in the non-CPA group were identified.

Conclusion

The success rate for ETI performed by physicians in the prehospital setting at a single emergency medical center was high, and the incidence of D/F ETI was 4.31 %. The success rate for ETI in the CPA group was greater than that in the non-CPA group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Breckwoldt J, Klemstein S, Brunne B, Schnitzer L, Mochmann HC, Arntz HR. Difficult prehospital endotracheal intubation—predisposing factors in a physician based EMS. Resuscitation. 2011;82:1519–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Helm M, Hossfeld B, Schäfer S, Hoitz J, Lampl L. Factors influencing emergency intubation in the pre-hospital setting—a multicentre investigation in the German Helicopter Emergency Medical Service. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96:67–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sollid SJ, Lossius HM, Søreide E. Pre-hospital intubation by anaesthesiologists in patients with severe trauma: an audit of a Norwegian helicopter emergency medical service. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2010;14:18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Warner KJ, Sharar SR, Copass MK, Bulger EM. Prehospital management of the difficult airway: a prospective cohort investigation. Emerg Med. 2009;36:257–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang HE, Mann NC, Mears G, Jacobson K, Yealy DM. Out-of-hospital airway management in the United States. Resuscitation. 2011;82:378–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jones JH, Murphy MP, Dickson RL, Somerville GG, Brizendine EJ. Emergency physician-verified out-of-hospital intubation: miss rates by paramedics. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:707–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jemmett ME, Kendal KM, Fourre MW, Burton JH. Unrecognized misplacement of endotracheal tubes in a mixed urban to rural emergency medical services setting. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10:961–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of difficult airway. Anesthesiology. 2003;98:1269–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Henderson JJ, Popat MT, Latto IP. Difficult Airway Society. Difficult Airway Society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation. Anaesthesia. 2004;59:675–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bair AE, Panacek EA, Wisner DH, Bales R, Sakles JC. Cricothyrotomy: a 5-year experience at one institution. J Emerg Med. 2003;24:151–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cobas MA, De la Peña MA, Manning R, Candiotti K, Varon AJ. Prehospital intubations and mortality: a level 1 trauma center perspective. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:489–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Struck MF, Wittrock M, Nowak A. Prehospital Glidescope video laryngoscopy for difficult airway management in a helicopter rescue program with anaesthetists. Eur J Emerg Med. 2011;18:282–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bjoernsen LP, Lindsay B. Video laryngoscopy in the prehospital setting. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2009;24:265–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Timmermann A, Russo SG, Eich C, Roessler M, Braun U, Rosenblatt WH, Quintel M. The out-of-hospital esophageal and endobronchial intubations performed by emergency physicians. Anesth Analg. 2007;104:619–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Combes X, Jabre P, Jbeili C, Leroux B, Bastuji-Garin S, Margenet A, Adnet F, Dhonneur G. Prehospital standardization of medical airway management: incidence and risk factors of difficult airway. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:828–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang HE, Kupas DF, Paris PM, Bates RR, Costantino JP, Yealy DM. Multivariate predictors of failed prehospital endotracheal intubation. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10:717–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Davis DP, Ochs M, Hoyt DB, Bailey D, Marshall LK, Rosen P. Paramedic-administered neuromuscular blockade improves prehospital intubation success in severely head-injured patients. J Trauma. 2003;55:713–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lieutaud T, Billard V, Khalaf H, Debaene B. Muscle relaxation and increasing doses of propofol improve intubating conditions. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50:121–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fakhry SM, Scanlon JM, Robinson L, Askari R, Watenpaugh RL, Fata P, Hauda WE, Trask A. Prehospital rapid sequence intubation for head trauma: conditions for a successful program. J Trauma. 2006;60:997–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fullerton JN, Roberts KJ, Wyse M. Should non-anaesthetists perform pre-hospital rapid sequence induction? An observational investigation. Emerg Med J. 2011;28:428–31.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kei Kamiutsuri.

About this article

Cite this article

Kamiutsuri, K., Okutani, R. & Kozawa, S. Analysis of prehospital endotracheal intubation performed by emergency physicians: retrospective survey of a single emergency medical center in Japan. J Anesth 27, 374–379 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1528-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-012-1528-x

Keywords

Navigation