Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative study of living conditions in cancer patients who have returned to work after curative treatment

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Goals of work

The goal of this study was to explore living conditions among disease-free cancer survivors participating in the labour force after successful primary treatment. Their living conditions were compared with the conditions of matched controls from the general Norwegian population.

Patients and methods

Living conditions are social indicators that stimulate social inclusion and reduce exclusion such as economy, employment, health, housing and social participation. A questionnaire covering living conditions with established questions from population surveys was mailed to 852 cancer survivors and 1,548 controls. Valid responses were obtained from 51% cancer survivors (216 women with breast cancer, 49 men with prostate cancer, and 165 with testicular cancer) and 39% controls (317 women and 279 men).

Main results

Compared to their controls cancer survivors showed no difference in work hours or full-time jobs, but reported significantly poorer physical and mental work capacity. This was associated with significantly more somatic diseases among survivors and poorer general health status in male survivors. The survivors had significantly smaller households and more living space than controls. No significant differences were observed concerning economy or social participation, except that significantly more female survivors than controls stated that they had enough friends.

Conclusions

In spite of poorer health, tumour-free survivors after breast, testicular, and prostate cancer report mostly equal living conditions compared to matched controls. The protection hypothesis of holding jobs as a precondition for normal living condition was confirmed in our study of a sample of cancer survivors with good outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arozullah AM, Calhoun EA, Wolf M, Finley DK, Fitzner KA, Heckinger EA, Gorby NS, Schumack GT, Bennett CL (2004) The financial burden of cancer: estimate from a study of insured women with breast cancer. J Support Oncol 3:271–278

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson T, Cantillon B, Marlier E, Nolan B (2002) Social indicators. The EU and social inclusion. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bednarek HL, Bradley CJ (2005) Work and retirement after cancer diagnosis. Res Nurs Health 28:126–135

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley CJ, Bednarek H (2002) Employment patterns of long-term cancer survivors. Psychooncology 11:188–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bradley CJ, Bednarek HL, Neumark D (2002) Breast cancer and women’s labour supply. Health Serv Res 37:1309–1328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradley CJ, Bednarek HL, Neumark D (2002) Breast cancer survival, work, and earnings. J Health Econ 21:757–779

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bradley CJ, Bednarek HL, Neumark D, Schemk M (2005) Short-term effect of breast cancer on labor market attachment: result from a longitudinal study. Health Econ 24:137–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cancer Registry of Norway (2002) Cancer in Norway 2000. Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dahl A, Haaland CF, Mykletun A, Bremnes R, Dahl O, Klepp O, Wist E, Fosså SD (2005) Study of anxiety disorder and depression in long-term survivors of testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:2389–2395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Erikson R, Goldtorpe JH (1992) The constant flux. A study of class mobility in industrial societies. Clarendon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krokstad S, Westin S (2002) Health inequalities by socioeconomics status among men in the Nord-Trøndelag health study, Norway. Scan J Public Health 30:113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kunst AE, Mackenbach JP (1994) Measuring socioeconomic inequalities in health. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kåresen R, Langmark F (2000) Kreftopererte kvinners psykiske, sosiale og økonomiske forhold (in Norwegian). Tidskr Nor Lægeforen 120:2741–2748

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lauzier S, Mausell E, De Koninck M, Drolet M, Hébert-Croteau N, Robert J (2005) Conceptualization and sources of costs from breast cancer: findings from patient and caregiver focus groups. Psychooncology 14:351–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Main DS, Nowels CT, Cavender TA, Etschamaier M, Steiner JF (2005) A qualitative study of work and work return in cancer survivors. Pschooncology 14:992–1004. DOI 10.1002/pon.913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maunsell E, Brisson C, Dubois L, Lauzier S, Fraser A (1999) Work problems after breast cancer: an exploratory qualitative study. Psychooncology 8:467–473

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Maunsell E, Drolet M, Brissin J, Brisson C, Mâsse B, Deshênes L (2004) Work situation after breast cancer: result from a population-based study. J Nat Cancer Inst 24:1813–1822

    Google Scholar 

  18. Short PF, Vasey JJ, Tunceli K (2005) Employment pathways in a large cohort of adult survivors. Cancer 103:1292–1301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Spelten ER, Sprangers MAG, Verbeek JHAM (2002) Factors reported to influence the return to work of cancer survivors: a literature review. Psychooncology 11:124–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Spelten ER, Verbeek JH, Uitterhoeve AL, Ansink AC, van der Lelie J, de Reijke TM, Kammeijer M, de Haes JC, Sprangers MA (2003) Cancer, fatigue and the return of patients to work—a prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer 39:1562–1567

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Office for National Statistics (2000) Standard occupational classification 2000 (SOC2000). http://www.statistics.gov.uk/methods-Quality/ns_sec/soc2000.asp

  22. Statistics Norway (2005) http://www.ssb.no

  23. Steiner JF, Cavender TA, Main DS, Bradley CJ (2004) Assessing the impact of cancer on work outcomes. What are the research needs? Cancer 8:1703–1711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taskila-Åbrandt T, Pukkala E, Martikainen R, Karjalainen A, Hietanen A (2004) Employment status of Finnish cancer patients in 1997. Psychooncology 14:221–226

    Google Scholar 

  25. Verbeek J, Spelten E, Kammeijer M, Spangers M (2003) Return to work of cancer survivors, a prospective cohort study into quality of rehabilitation by occupational physicians. Occup Environ Med 60:352–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Veronesi U, von Kleist, Redmond K, Costa A, Delvaux N, Freilich G, Galus A, Hudson T, McVie JG, Macnamara C, Meunir F, Pecorelli S, Serin D, CAWAC Study Group (1999) Caring about women and cancer (CAWAC): a European survey of the perspectives and experiences of women with female cancer. Eur J Cancer 12:1667–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was sponsored by a research grant from The Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation (grant no. H0-54010/002) and a grant from the Nordic Cancer Union.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sævar B. Gudbergsson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gudbergsson, S.B., Fosså, S.D., Borgeraas, E. et al. A comparative study of living conditions in cancer patients who have returned to work after curative treatment. Support Care Cancer 14, 1020–1029 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0042-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0042-9

Keywords

Navigation