Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum is safe even for high-risk patients

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Because of absorbed carbon dioxide (CO2) and elevated intraabdominal pressure (IAP), CO2 pneumoperitoneum (CO2PP) has potentially harmful intraoperative circulatory and ventilatory effects. Although not clinically significant for healthy patients, these effects are assumed to be deleterious for patients with a high risk for anesthesia (American Society of Anesthesiology [ASA] 3 and 4) and significant cardiopulmonary, renal, or hepatic diseases. The authors assessed CO2PP-related adverse effects by comparing ASA 3 and 4 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with or without CO2PP.

Methods

A total of 20 successive ASA 3 and 4 patients who underwent LC were randomized into CO2PP (n = 10) and abdominal wall elevator (Laparolift) (n = 10) groups. The parameters for perioperative hemodynamics, ventilation, perfusion of intraabdominal organs, and blood chemistry were recorded periodically from before the induction of the anesthesia until postoperative day 2 and compared between the groups.

Results

Mean age, height, weight, the proportional number of ASA 3 vs ASA 4 patients, the volume of perioperative fluid loading, and the dose of analgesics did not differ significantly between the groups. The length of the operation was 49.9 ± 10.6 min for the CO2PP group and 50.6 ± 17.2 min for Laparolift group (nonsignificant difference). The mean central venous pressure (CVP) 30 min after insufflation was higher (12.3 ± 4.8 vs 7.9 ± 3.7 mmHg) and the (Gastric Mucosal pH) pHi at the end of the operation was lower (7.29 ± 0.07 vs 7.35 ± 0.04) in the CO2PP group than in the Laparolift group (p < 0.05). Later, CVP and pHi did not differ significantly. Other parameters of hemodynamics including oxygenation, perfusion, and blood chemistry did not differ significantly.

Conclusions

For LC for patients with an ASA 3 and 4 risk for anesthesia, no significant adverse effects could be attributed to CO2 pneumoperitoneum. For high-risk patients, preoperative preparation and active perioperative monitoring are essential for safe anesthesia for LC with or without CO2PP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bardoczky GI, Engelman E, Levarlet M, Simon P (1993) Ventilatory effects of pneumoperitoneum monitored with continuous spirometry. Anaesthesia 48: 309–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Carry PY, Gallet D, Francois Y, Perdrix JP, Sayag A, Gilly F, Eberhard A, Banssillon V, Baconnier P (1998) Respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the effects of the abdominal wall lift. Anesth Analg 87: 1393–1397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Galizia G, Prizio G, Lieto E, Castellano P, Pelosio L, Imperatore V, Ferrara A, Pignatelli C (2001) Hemodynamic and pulmonary changes during open, carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and abdominal wall-lifting cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc 15: 477–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harman PK, Kron IL, McLachlan HD, Freedlender AE, Nolan S (1982) Elevated intraabdominal pressure and renal function. Ann Surg 196: 594–597

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hasukic S (2005) Postoperative changes in liver function tests: randomized comparison of low- and high-pressure laparoscopiccholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 19: 1451–1455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirvonen EA, Nuutinen LS, Kauko M (1995) Ventilatory effects, blood gas changes, and oxygen consumption during laparoscopic hysterctomy. Anesth Analg 80: 961–966

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Joris JL, Noirot DP, Legrand MJ, Jacquet NJ, Lamy ML (1996) Hemodynamic changes during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 76: 1067–1071

    Google Scholar 

  8. Junghans T, Modersohn D, Dorner F, Neudecker J, Haase O, Schwenk W (2006) Systematic evaluation of different approaches for minimizing hemodynamic changes during pneumoperitoneum. Surg Endosc 20: 763–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kendall A, Bhatt S, Oh T (1995) Pulmonary consequences of carbon dioxide insufflation for laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Anaesthesia 50: 286–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Knolmayer TJ, Bowyer MW, Egan JC, Asbun HJ (1998) The effects of pneumoperitoneum on gastric blood flow and traditional hemodynamic measurements. Surg Endosc 12: 115–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Koivusalo AM, Kellokumpu I, Ristkari S, Lindgren L (1997) Splanchnic and renal deterioration during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparison of the carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum and the abdominal wall lift method. Anesth Analg 85: 886–891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McLaughlin J, Scheeres D, Dean R, Bonnell B (1995) The adverse hemodynamic effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 9: 121–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meierhenrich R, Gauss A, Vandenesch P, Georgieff M, Poch B, Schutz W (2005) The effects of intraabdominally insufflated carbon dioxide on hepatic blood flow during laparoscopic surgery assessed by transesophageal echocardiography. Anesth Analg 100: 340–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meininger D, Byhahn C, Mierdl S, Westphal K, Zwissler B (2005) Positive end-expiratory pressure improves arterial oxygenation during prolonged pneumoperitoneum. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 49: 778–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miki Y, Iwase K, Kamiike W, Taniguchi E, Sakaguchi K, Sumimura J, Matsuda H, Nagai I (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and time course changes in renal function. Surg Endosc 11: 838–841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Morino M, Giraudo G, Festa V (1998) Alterations in hepatic function during laparoscopic surgery: an experimental clinical study. Surg Endosc 12: 968–972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, Bergamaschi R, Bonjer HJ, Cuschieri A, Fuchs KH, Jacobi C, Jansen FW, Koivusalo AM, Lacy A, McMahon MJ, Millat B, Schwenk W (2002) The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16: 1121–1143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Leary E, Hubbard K, Tormey W, Cunningham A (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystevtomy: haemodynamic and neuroendocrine response after pneumoperitoneum and changes in position. Br J Anaesth 76: 640–644

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paolucci V, Gutt CN, Schaeff B, Encke A (1995) Gasless laparoscopy in abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 9: 497–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rademaker BM, Meyer DW, Bannenberg JJ, Klopper PJ, Kalkman CJ (1995) Laparoscopy without pneumoperitoneum: effects of abdominal wall retraction versus carbon dioxide insufflation on hemodynamics and gas exchange in pigs. Surg Endosc 9: 797–801

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sato K, Kawamura T, Wakusawa R (2000) Hepatic blood flow and function in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg 90: 1198–1202

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schilling MK, Redaelli C, Krahenbuhl L, Signer C, Buchler MW (1997) Splanchnic microcirculatory changes during CO2 laparoscopy. J Am Coll Surg 184: 378–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Struthers AD, Cuschieri A (1998) Cardiovascular consequences of laparoscopic surgery. Lancet 352: 568–570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Thoelke MH, Merkelbach D, Ehmann T, Henrich P, Engelhardt GH, Brandt L (1995) The abdominal lift: is there any advantage for the critically ill patient? Endosc Surg Allied Technol. 3: 180–182

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Windberger UB, Auer R, Keplinger F, Langle F, Heinze G, Schindl M, Losert UM (1999) The role of intraabdominal pressure on splanchnic and pulmonary hemodynamic and metabolic changes during carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum. Gastrointest Endosc 49: 84–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Wittgen C, Andreus C, Fitzgerald S, Baudendistel L, Dahms T, Kaminski D (1991) Analysis of the hemodynamic and ventilatory effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 126: 997–1001

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Helsinki University, Kasarmikatu 11-13, 00100, Helsinki, Finland

    A.-M. Koivusalo, P. Pere & M. Valjus

  2. Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmanin Katu 4, 00290, Helsinki, Finland

    T. Scheinin

Authors
  1. A.-M. Koivusalo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. Pere
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Valjus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Scheinin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A.-M. Koivusalo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koivusalo, AM., Pere, P., Valjus, M. et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum is safe even for high-risk patients. Surg Endosc 22, 61–67 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9300-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-007-9300-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation