Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prevalence of workplace bullying and risk groups: a representative population study

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 12 March 2009

Abstract

Objectives

To estimate the prevalence of bullying and to identify risk groups in a representative population sample.

Methods

The data for this study was taken from the second Danish Psychosocial Work Environment Study (DPWES). The sample consisted of 3,429 employees between 20 and 59-years. The response rate for the study was 60.4%.

Results

The study showed that 8.3% of the respondents had been bullied within the past year, 1.6% of the sample reported daily to weekly bullying. Co-workers (71.5%) and managers/supervisors (32.4%) were most often reported as perpetrators of bullying, but bullying from subordinates (6%) was also reported. We found significant differences in the prevalence of bullying for both occupational status and work process, a variable characterizing the employees main task in their job. Unskilled workers reported the highest prevalence of bullying, while managers/supervisors the lowest prevalence. People working with things (male-dominated occupations) and people working with clients/patients (female-dominated occupations) reported higher prevalence of bullying than people working with symbols or customers. No significant gender or age differences were found.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that types of work and gender ratio are risk factors in the onset of workplace bullying. Future studies should take into account the type of work and the gender ratio of the organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  • Agervold M, Mikkelsen EG (2004) Relationships between bullying, psychosocial work environment and individual stress reactions. Work Stress 8:336–351. doi:10.1080/02678370412331319794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkqvist K, Österman K, Hjelt-Bäck M (1994) Aggression among university employees. Aggress Behav 20:173–184. doi :10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:3 ≤ 173::AID-AB2480200304 ≥ 3.0.CO;2-D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie H, Jennifer D, Neto C, Angulo JC, Pereira B, Del Barrio C, et al. Sheehan, M.; Ramsey, S.; Patrick, J. (2000) Comparing the nature of workplace bullying in two European countries: Portugal and UK. Transcending boundaries: integrating people, processes and systems, Brisbane, 6-9-2000

  • Dansk fagkode (The Danish job classification) (1986) The Directorate of Labour, Copenhagen. på NFA

  • Dansk Branchekode (2003) DB03 Danish Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities 2003 (in danish). Danmarks Statistik (Statistics Denmark), Copenhagen 2002. på NFA

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen S (1996) Bullying and harassment at work: epidemiological and psychosocial aspects. University of Bergen, Afhandlingen haves.

  • Einarsen S (2000) Harassment and bullying at work: a review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggress Violent Behav 5:379–401. doi:10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00043-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen S, Raknes BI (1997) Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence Vict 12:247–263

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen S, Skogstad A (1996) Bullying at work: epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. Eur Work Organ Psychol 5:185–201. doi:10.1080/13594329608414854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen S, Zapf D (2003) Individual antecedents of bullying: victims and perpetrators. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. international perspectives in research and practice.. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 165–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (2003) The concept of bullying at work: the European tradition. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. international perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 3–30.

  • Feveile H, Olsen O, Hogh A (2007) A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: response patterns in a survey. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:27. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-7-27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel H, Cooper CL (2000) Destructive conflict and bullying at work. University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoel H, Cooper CL, Faragher B (2001) The experience of bullying in Great Britain: the impact of organizational status. Eur Work Organ Psychol 10:443–465. doi:10.1080/13594320143000780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoel H, Einarsen S, Keashley L, Zapf D, Cooper CL (2003) Bullying at work. The way forward. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 412–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1980) Cultures consequences: international differences in work related values. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G (1991) Cultures and organzations: software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogh A, Dofradottir A (2001) Coping with bullying in the workplace. Eur Work Organ Psycho 10:485–495. doi:10.1080/13594320143000825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubert AB, van Veldhoven M (2001) Risk sectors for undesirable behaviour and mobbing. Eur Work Organ Psychol 10:415–424. doi:10.1080/13594320143000799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leymann H (1992) Vuxenmobbning på svenska arbetsplatser. Stockholm: Arbetarskyddsstyrelsen; Report No.: 1. kopi

  • Leymann H (1996) The content and development of mobbing at work. Eur Work Organ Psychol 5:165–184. doi:10.1080/13594329608414853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkelsen EG, Einarsen S (2001) Bullying in Danish work-life: prevalence and health correlates. Eur Work Organ Psychol 10:393–413. doi:10.1080/13594320143000816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moayed FA, Daraiseh N, Shell R, Salem S (2006) Workplace bullying: a systematic review of risk factors and outcomes. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 7:311–327. doi:10.1080/14639220500090604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niedhammer I, David S, Degioanni S (2007) Economic activities and occupations at high risk for workplace bullying: results from a large-scale cross-sectional survey in the general working population in France. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 80:346–353. doi:10.1007/s00420-006-0139-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niedl K (1996) Mobbing and well-being: economic and personnel development implications. Eur Work Organ Psychol 5:239–249. doi:10.1080/13594329608414857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quine L (1999) Workplace bullying in NHS trust: staff questionnaire survey. BMJ 318:228–232

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner C, Hoel H (1997) A summary review of literature relating to workplace bullying. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 7(3):181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner C, Keashly L (2005) Bullying at work: a perspective from Britain and North America. In: Fox S, Spector PE Counterproductive work behavior. Investigations of actors and targets. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 271–296

  • Rayner C, Hoel H, Cooper CL (2002) Workplace bullying. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Salin D (2001) Prevalence and forms of bullying among business professionals: a comparison of two different strategies for measuring bullying. Eur Work Organ Psychol 10:425–441. doi:10.1080/13594320143000771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemiatycki J, Campbell S, Richardson L, Aubert D (1984) Quality of response in different population groups in mail and telephone surveys. Am J Epidemiol 120:302–314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorsted BL (2007) Forskerbeskyttelse i CPR. Det 29. symposium i anvendt statistikÅrhus Universitet: Danmarks Statistik van der Zouwen, J. and de Leeuw, E. D. (1991) The relationship between mode of administration and quality of data in survey research. Bull Methodol Sociol 31:49–60

  • van der Zouwen J, de Leeuw ED (1991) The relationship between mode of administration and quality of data in survey research. Bull Methodol Sociol 31:49–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartia M (1996) The sources of bullying—psychological work environment and organizational climate. Eur Work Organ Psychol 5:203–214. doi:10.1080/13594329608414855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vartia M (2003) Workplace bullying—a study on the work environment, well-being and health. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health

  • Vartia M, Hyyti J (2002) Gender differences in workplace bullying among prison officers. Eur Work Organ Psychol 11(1):113–126. doi:10.1080/13594320143000870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf D, Einarsen S (2005) Mobbing at work: escalated conflicts in organizations. In: Fox S, Spector PE Counterproductive work behavior. investigations of actors and targets. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 237–270

  • Zapf D, Einarsen S, Hoel H, Vartia M (2003) Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace international perspectives in research and practice, 1st edn edn. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 103–126

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Lersø Parkallé 105, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Adriana Ortega, Annie Høgh, Jan Hyld Pejtersen & Ole Olsen

Authors
  1. Adriana Ortega
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Annie Høgh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan Hyld Pejtersen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ole Olsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adriana Ortega.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00420-009-0409-6

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ortega, A., Høgh, A., Pejtersen, J.H. et al. Prevalence of workplace bullying and risk groups: a representative population study. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 82, 417–426 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0339-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-008-0339-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation