Abstract
Aim
The aim of our study was to compare traumatic injuries observed after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) by means of standard (manual) or assisted (mechanical) chest compression by Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System, 2nd generation (LUCAS™2) device.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted including cases from 2011 to 2013, analysing consecutive autopsy reports in two groups of patients who underwent medicolegal autopsy after unsuccessful CPR. We focused on traumatic injuries from dermal to internal trauma, collecting data according to a standardised protocol.
Results
The study group was comprised of 26 cases, while 32 cases were included in the control group. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by LUCAS™2 was longer than manual CPR performed in control cases (study group: mean duration 51.5 min; controls 29.4 min; p = 0.004). Anterior chest lesions (from bruises to abrasions) were described in 18/26 patients in the LUCAS™2 group and in 6/32 of the control group. A mean of 6.6 rib fractures per case was observed in the LUCAS™2 group, but this was only 3.1 in the control group (p = 0.007). Rib fractures were less frequently observed in younger patients. The frequency of sternal factures was similar in both groups. A few trauma injuries to internal organs (mainly cardiac, pulmonary and hepatic bruises), and some petechiae (study 46 %; control 41 %; p = 0.79) were recorded in both groups.
Conclusion
LUCAS™2-CPR is associated with more rib fractures than standard CPR. Typical round concentric skin lesions were observed in cases of mechanical reanimation. No life-threatening injuries were reported. Petechiae were common findings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kouwenhoven WB, Jude JR, Knickerbocker GG (1960) Closed chest cardiac massage. JAMA 173:1064–1067
Jude JR, Kouwenhoven WB, Knickerbocker GG (1961) Cardiac arrest: report of application of external cardiac massage on 118 patients. JAMA 178:1063–1070
Plaisance P, Adnet F, Vicaut E et al (1997) Benefit of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation as a pre-hospital advances cardiac life support. A randomised multicentre study. Circulation 95:955–961
Wik L (2000) Automatic and manual mechanical external chest compression devices for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 47:7–25
Steen S, Liao Q, Pierre L, Paskevicius A, Sjöberg T (2002) Evaluation of LUCAS, a new device for automatic mechanical compression and active decompression resuscitation. Resuscitation 55:285–299
Gaxiola A, Varon J (2008) Evolution and new perspective of chest compression mechanical devices. Am J Emerg Med 26:923–931
Rubertsson S, Karlsten R (2005) Increased cortical blood flow with LUCAS: a new device for mechanical chest compressions compared to standard external compressions during experimental cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 65:357–363
Tambe SP, Rasmussen VG, Modrau IS (2012) Continuous mechanical chest compression using the LUCAS-2 device as a bridge to emergency aortic valve surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 26:e50–e52. doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2012.03.015
Putzer G, Braun P, Zimmermann A, Pedross F, Strapazzon G, Brugger H, Paal P (2013) LUCAS compared to manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation is more effective during helicopter rescue—a prospective, randomised, cross-over manikin study. Am J Emerg Med 31:384–389. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2012.07.018
Himmelhoch SR, Dekker A, Gazzniga AB (1964) Closed-chest cardiac resuscitation. A prospective clinical and pathological study. N Engl J Med 270:118–122
Buschmann CT, Tsokos M (2009) Frequent and rare complications of resuscitation attempts. Intensive Care Med 35:397–404. doi:10.1007/s00134-008-1255-9
Pinto DC, Haden-Pinneri K, Love JC (2013) Manual and automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR): a comparison of associated injury patterns. J Forensic Sci 58:904–909. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.12146
Baubin M, Sumann G, Rabl W, Eibl G, Wenzel V, Mair P (1999) Increased frequency of thorax injuries with ACD-CPR. Resuscitation 41:33–38
Hoke RS, Chamberlain D (2004) Skeletal chest injuries secondary to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 64:327–338
Smekal D, Johansson J, Huzevka T, Rubertsson S (2009) No difference in autopsy detected injuries in cardiac arrest patients treated with manual chest compressions compared with mechanical compressions with the LUCAS™ device—a pilot study. Resuscitation 80:1104–1107. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.06.010
Englund E, Kongstad PC (2006) Active compression-decompression CPR necessitates follow-up post mortem. Resuscitation 68:161–162
Fanton L, David JS, Gueugniaud PY, Malicier D (2008) Forensic aspects of automated chest compression. Resuscitation 77:273–274. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.12.012
Mateos-Rodriguez A, Pardillos-Ferrer L, Navalpotro JM et al (2010) Kidney transplant function using organs from non-heart-beating donors maintained by mechanical chest compressions. Resuscitation 81:904–907. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.024
Wang CH, Chou NK, Becker LB et al (2014) Improved outcome of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest—a comparison with that for extracorporeal rescue for in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 85:1219–1224. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.06.022
Field JM, Hazinski MF, Sayre MR et al (2010) Part 1: Executive summary. 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 122:640–656. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970889
Idris AH, Becker LB, Ornato JP et al (1996) Utstein-style guidelines for uniform reporting of laboratory CPR research. A statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the American Heart Association, the American College of Emergency Physicians, the American College of Cardiology, the European Resuscitation Council, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the Institute of Critical Care Medicine, the Safar Center for Resuscitation Research, and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Writing Group. Circulation 94:2324–2336
European Concil of Legal Medicine, Harmonization of medico-legal autopsy, Updated version October 2012, available at http://eclm.org/docs/Documents/Harmonization_of_Medico_legal_Autopsy_Protocol_.pdf. Accessed 13 October 2014
Smekal D, Lindgren E, Sandler H, Johansson J, Rubertsson S (2014) CPR-related injuries after manual or mechanical chest compressions with the LUCAS™ device: a multicentre study of victims after unsuccessful resuscitation. Resuscitation. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.017
Baubin M, Rabl W, Pfeiffer KF, Benzer A, Gilly H (1999) Chest injuries after active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR) in cadavers. Resuscitation 43:9–15
Krischer JP, Fine EG, Davis JH, Nagel EL (1987) Complications of cardiac resuscitation. Chest 92:287–291
Liao Q, Sjöberg T, Paskevicius A, Wohlfart B, Steen S (2010) Manual versus mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. An experimental study in pigs. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 10:53. doi:10.1186/1471-2261-10-53
Xanthos T, Pantazopoulos I, Roumelioti H et al (2011) A comparison of autopsy detected injuries in a porcine model of cardiac arrest treated with either manual or mechanical chest compressions. Eur J Emerg Med 18:108–110. doi:10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32833e79cf
McKay DR, Fawzy HF, McKay KM, Nitsch R, Mahoney JL (2010) Are chest compressions safe for the patient reconstructed with sternal plates? Evaluating the safety of cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a human cadaveric model. J Cardiothorac Surg 5:64. doi:10.1186/1749-8090-5-64
Cho J, Chung HS, Chung SP, Kim Y-M, Cho YS (2010) Airway scope vs. Macintosh laryngoscope during chest compressions on a fresh cadaver model. Am J Emerg Med 28:741–744
Wininger KL (2007) Chest compressions: biomechanics and injury. Radiol Technol 78:269–274
Lederer W, Mair D, Rabl W, Baubin M (2004) Frequency of rib and sternum fractures associated with out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation is underestimated by conventional chest X-ray. Resuscitation 60:157–162
Oberladstaetter D, Braun P, Freund MC, Rabl W, Paal P, Baubin M (2012) Autopsy is more sensitive than computed tomography in detection of LUCAS-CPR related non-dislocated chest fractures. Resuscitation 83:e89–e90. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.12.003
Hashimoto Y, Moriya F, Furumiya J (2007) Forensic aspects of complications resulting from cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Legal Med 9:94–99
Hood I, Ryan D, Spitz WU (1988) Resuscitation and petechiae. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 9:35–37
Raven KP, Reay DT, Harruff RC (1999) Artifactual injuries of the larynx produced by resuscitative intubation. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 20:31–36
Maxeiner H (2001) Congestion bleeding of the face and cardiopulmonary resuscitation—an attempt to evaluate their relationship. Forensic Sci Int 117:191–198
Maxeiner H, Jekat R (2010) Resuscitation and conjunctival petechial haemorrhages. J Forensic Leg Med 17:87–91. doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2009.09.010
Bush CM, Jones JS, Cohle SD, Johnson H (1996) Paediatric injuries from cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Ann Emerg Med 28(1):40–44
Perkins GD, Woollard M, Cooke MW et al (2010) Pre-hospital randomised assessment of a mechanical compression device in cardiac arrest (PaRAMeDIC) trial protocol. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 18:58. doi:10.1186/1757-7241-18-58
Rubertsson S, Silfverstolpe J, Rehn L et al (2013) The study protocol for the LINC (LUCAS in cardiac arrest) study: a study comparing conventional adult out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a concept with mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 21:5. doi:10.1186/1757-7241-21-5
Rubertsson S, Lindgren E, Smekal D et al (2014) Mechanical chest compressions and simultaneous defibrillation vs. conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the LINC randomised trial. JAMA 311:53–61. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.282538
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their gratitude to Aurélie Bornand and Paula Reynaud for their help with review of literature and data collection and to Hélène Deham for her comments on biostatistics.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lardi, C., Egger, C., Larribau, R. et al. Traumatic injuries after mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation (LUCAS™2): a forensic autopsy study. Int J Legal Med 129, 1035–1042 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1146-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1146-x