Skip to main content
Log in

As time goes by? The fallacy of thrombolysis in STEMI networks

  • Critical Perspective
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is superior to thrombolysis (TL) as reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). TL is a rapidly available, but semi-effective therapy (effective reperfusion in 50% of patients only), whereas PPCI is a potentially delayed, but highly effective therapy (effective reperfusion in >90%). Since TL loses its efficacy beyond 2–3 h after symptom onset, it is a significant reperfusion alternative to PPCI in early presenters only. The individual decision to treat an early presenter with PPCI or TL requires the evaluation of the time delay between potential start of TL or PPCI, the PCI-related delay (PRD). PRD is greatest, if TL is given in the prehospital setting. Until now, prehospital TL as the most rapidly available reperfusion strategy has failed to demonstrate any prognostic or even any other relevant benefit compared to PPCI in any subgroup of patients, even with time delays for PPCI of up to several hours. On average, a median PRD of at least 90–120 min can be considered a time corridor of prognostic superiority of PPCI over TL. This is already achieved in contemporary registries and myocardial infarction networks.

Therefore, the efforts should not focus on the implementation of a dual reperfusion strategy (PPCI, and prehospital TL in selected cases) in established or upcoming myocardial infarction networks, but concentrate on the availability of PPCI in less than 2 h. TL, as rapid as possible, i.e. prehospital, is a vital treatment option in case of non-existing PPCI facilities within a median time limit of 2 h or even more, a scenario not existing or easily to eliminate in European countries by implementing well organized myocardial infarction networks. This is the mission to be accomplished.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Crea F, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fox K, Huber K, Kastrati A, Rosengren A, Steg PG, Tubaro M, Verheugt F, Weidinger F, Weis M, Vahanian A, Camm J, De Caterina R, Dean V, Dickstein K, Filippatos G, Funck-Brentano C, Hellemans I, Kristensen SD, McGregor K, Sechtem U, Silber S, Tendera M, Widimsky P, Zamorano JL, Silber S, Aguirre FV, Al-Attar N, Alegria E, Andreotti F, Benzer W, Breithardt O, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Dudek D, Gulba D, Halvorsen S, Kaufmann P, Kornowski R, Lip GY, Rutten F (2008) Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 29(23):2909–2945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Widimsky P (2010) Primary angioplasty vs. thrombolysis: the end of the controversy? Eur Heart J 31(6):634–636

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Lamas GA, Mullany CJ, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Smith SC Jr, Anbe DT, Kushner FG, Ornato JP, Jacobs AK, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Buller CE, Creager MA, Ettinger SM, Halperin JL, Hunt SA, Lytle BW, Nishimura R, Page RL, Riegel B, Tarkington LG, Yancy CW (2008) 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 51(2):210–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nallamothu BK, Bradley EH, Krumholz HM (2007) Time to treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 357(16):1631–1638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boersma E (2006) Does time matter? A pooled analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous coronary intervention and in-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction patients. Eur Heart J 27(7):779–788

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eagle KA, Nallamothu BK, Mehta RH, Granger CB, Steg PG, Van de Werf F, Lopez-Sendon J, Goodman SG, Quill A, Fox KA (2008) Trends in acute reperfusion therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction from 1999 to 2006: we are getting better but we have got a long way to go. Eur Heart J 29(5):609–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kalla K, Christ G, Karnik R, Malzer R, Norman G, Prachar H, Schreiber W, Unger G, Glogar HD, Kaff A, Laggner AN, Maurer G, Mlczoch J, Slany J, Weber HS, Huber K (2006) Implementation of guidelines improves the standard of care: the Viennese registry on reperfusion strategies in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (Vienna STEMI registry). Circulation 113(20):2398–2405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL (2003) Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 361(9351):13–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nallamothu B, Fox KA, Kennelly BM, Van de Werf F, Gore JM, Steg PG, Granger CB, Dabbous OH, Kline-Rogers E, Eagle KA (2007) Relationship of treatment delays and mortality in patients undergoing fibrinolysis and primary percutaneous coronary intervention. The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events. Heart 93(12):1552–1555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pinto DS, Kirtane AJ, Nallamothu BK, Murphy SA, Cohen DJ, Laham RJ, Cutlip DE, Bates ER, Frederick PD, Miller DP, Carrozza JP Jr, Antman EM, Cannon CP, Gibson CM (2006) Hospital delays in reperfusion for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: implications when selecting a reperfusion strategy. Circulation 114(19):2019–2025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stenestrand U, Lindback J, Wallentin L (2006) Long-term outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention vs prehospital and in-hospital thrombolysis for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 296(14):1749–1756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zahn R, Schiele R, Schneider S, Gitt AK, Wienbergen H, Seidl K, Voigtlander T, Gottwik M, Berg G, Altmann E, Rosahl W, Senges J (2001) Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: can we define subgroups of patients benefiting most from primary angioplasty? Results from the pooled data of the Maximal Individual Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry and the Myocardial Infarction Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 37(7):1827–1835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bjorklund E, Stenestrand U, Lindback J, Svensson L, Wallentin L, Lindahl B (2006) Pre-hospital thrombolysis delivered by paramedics is associated with reduced time delay and mortality in ambulance-transported real-life patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 27(10):1146–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonnefoy E, Steg PG, Boutitie F, Dubien PY, Lapostolle F, Roncalli J, Dissait F, Vanzetto G, Leizorowicz A, Kirkorian G, Mercier C, McFadden EP, Touboul P (2009) Comparison of primary angioplasty and pre-hospital fibrinolysis in acute myocardial infarction (CAPTIM) trial: a 5-year follow-up. Eur Heart J 30(13):1598–1606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradley EH, Herrin J, Wang Y, Barton BA, Webster TR, Mattera JA, Roumanis SA, Curtis JP, Nallamothu BK, Magid DJ, McNamara RL, Parkosewich J, Loeb JM, Krumholz HM (2006) Strategies for reducing the door-to-balloon time in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 355(22):2308–2320

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Brown JP, Mahmud E, Dunford JV, Ben-Yehuda O (2008) Effect of prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram on activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory and door-to-balloon time in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 101(2):158–161

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Canto JG, Zalenski RJ, Ornato JP, Rogers WJ, Kiefe CI, Magid D, Shlipak MG, Frederick PD, Lambrew CG, Littrell KA, Barron HV (2002) Use of emergency medical services in acute myocardial infarction and subsequent quality of care: observations from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Circulation 106(24):3018–3023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Curtis JP, Portnay EL, Wang Y, McNamara RL, Herrin J, Bradley EH, Magid DJ, Blaney ME, Canto JG, Krumholz HM (2006) The pre-hospital electrocardiogram and time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 2000–2002: findings from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(8):1544–1552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Danchin N, Coste P, Ferrieres J, Steg PG, Cottin Y, Blanchard D, Belle L, Ritz B, Kirkorian G, Angioi M, Sans P, Charbonnier B, Eltchaninoff H, Gueret P, Khalife K, Asseman P, Puel J, Goldstein P, Cambou JP, Simon T (2008) Comparison of thrombolysis followed by broad use of percutaneous coronary intervention with primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction: data from the french registry on acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (FAST-MI). Circulation 118(3):268–276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Danchin N, Durand E, Blanchard D (2008) Pre-hospital thrombolysis in perspective. Eur Heart J 29(23):2835–2842

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Diercks DB, Kirk JD, Lindsell CJ, Pollack CV Jr, Hoekstra JW, Gibler WB, Hollander JE (2006) Door-to-ECG time in patients with chest pain presenting to the ED. Am J Emerg Med 24(1):1–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL (2006) Comparison of primary and facilitated percutaneous coronary interventions for ST-elevation myocardial infarction: quantitative review of randomised trials. Lancet 367(9510):579–588

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McNamara RL, Herrin J, Bradley EH, Portnay EL, Curtis JP, Wang Y, Magid DJ, Blaney M, Krumholz HM (2006) Hospital improvement in time to reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction, 1999 to 2002. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(1):45–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McNamara RL, Wang Y, Herrin J, Curtis JP, Bradley EH, Magid DJ, Peterson ED, Blaney M, Frederick PD, Krumholz HM (2006) Effect of door-to-balloon time on mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 47(11):2180–2186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zahn R, Vogt A, Zeymer U, Gitt AK, Seidl K, Gottwik M, Weber MA, Niederer W, Modl B, Engel HJ, Tebbe U, Senges J (2005) In-hospital time to treatment of patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty: determinants and outcome. Results from the registry of percutaneous coronary interventions in acute myocardial infarction of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausarzte. Heart 91(8):1041–1046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuch B, von Scheidt W, Ehmann A, Kling B, Greschik C, Hoermann A, Meisinger C (2009) Extent of the decrease of 28-day case fatality of hospitalized patients with acute myocardial infarction over 22 years: epidemiological versus clinical view: the MONICA/KORA Augsburg infarction registry. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2(4):313–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Löwel HMC, Heier M, Hörmann A, von Scheidt W (2006) Herzinfarkt und koronare Sterblichkeit in Süddeutschland. Dt Ärztebl 103:A616–A622

    Google Scholar 

  28. BM Silber S, Hasenfuß G, Falk V, Kastrati A, Weis M, Hamm CW (2010) Kommentare zu den Leitlinien der Europäischen Gesellschaft für Kardiologie (ESC) zur Diagnostik und Therapie von Patienten mit ST-Streckenhebungsinfarkt (STEMI). Kardiologe 4:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Terkelsen CJ, Christiansen EH, Sorensen JT, Kristensen SD, Lassen JF, Thuesen L, Andersen HR, Vach W, Nielsen TT (2009) Primary PCI as the preferred reperfusion therapy in STEMI: it is a matter of time. Heart 95(5):362–369

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Van de Werf F (2006) Primary versus tenecteplase-facilitated percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (ASSENT-4 PCI): randomised trial. Lancet 367(9510):569–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Verheugt FW (2009) Routine angioplasty after fibrinolysis—how early should “early” be? N Engl J Med 360(26):2779–2781

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Edmond JJ, Juergens CP, French JK (2009) The pharmaco-invasive approach to STEMI: when should fibrinolytic-treated patients go to the “cath lab”? Postgrad Med J 85(1004):331–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Eitel I, Franke A, Schuler G, Thiele H ST-segment resolution and prognosis after facilitated versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Clin Res Cardiol 99(1):1–11

  34. Buckley JW, Nallamothu BK (2010) Percutaneous coronary intervention after successful fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Better late than never. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(2):111–113

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cantor WJ, Fitchett D, Borgundvaag B, Ducas J, Heffernan M, Cohen EA, Morrison LJ, Langer A, Dzavik V, Mehta SR, Lazzam C, Schwartz B, Casanova A, Goodman SG (2009) Routine early angioplasty after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 360(26):2705–2718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Di Mario C, Dudek D, Piscione F, Mielecki W, Savonitto S, Murena E, Dimopoulos K, Manari A, Gaspardone A, Ochala A, Zmudka K, Bolognese L, Steg PG, Flather M (2008) Immediate angioplasty versus standard therapy with rescue angioplasty after thrombolysis in the Combined Abciximab REteplase Stent Study in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CARESS-in-AMI): an open, prospective, randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet 371(9612):559–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Scheller B, Hennen B, Hammer B, Walle J, Hofer C, Hilpert V, Winter H, Nickenig G, Bohm M (2003) Beneficial effects of immediate stenting after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 42(4):634–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Steg PG, Bonnefoy E, Chabaud S, Lapostolle F, Dubien PY, Cristofini P, Leizorovicz A, Touboul P (2003) Impact of time to treatment on mortality after prehospital fibrinolysis or primary angioplasty: data from the CAPTIM randomized clinical trial. Circulation 108(23):2851–2856

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Gershlick AH, Stephens-Lloyd A, Hughes S, Abrams KR, Stevens SE, Uren NG, de Belder A, Davis J, Pitt M, Banning A, Baumbach A, Shiu MF, Schofield P, Dawkins KD, Henderson RA, Oldroyd KG, Wilcox R (2005) Rescue angioplasty after failed thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 353(26):2758–2768

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Sutton AG, Campbell PG, Graham R, Price DJ, Gray JC, Grech ED, Hall JA, Harcombe AA, Wright RA, Smith RH, Murphy JJ, Shyam-Sundar A, Stewart MJ, Davies A, Linker NJ, de Belder MA (2004) A randomized trial of rescue angioplasty versus a conservative approach for failed fibrinolysis in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the Middlesbrough Early Revascularization to Limit INfarction (MERLIN) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(2):287–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Thilo C BA, Kuch B, von Scheidt W (2010) Herzinfarktnetzwerk Region Augsburg (HERA)—Einjahresergebnisse. Notfall Rettungsmed. doi:10.1007/s10049-010-1335-6

  42. Zeymer U, Arntz HR, Dirks B, Ellinger K, Genzwurker H, Nibbe L, Tebbe U, Senges J, Schneider S (2009) Reperfusion rate and inhospital mortality of patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction diagnosed already in the prehospital phase: results of the German Prehospital Myocardial Infarction Registry (PREMIR). Resuscitation 80(4):402–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lambert L, Brown K, Segal E, Brophy J, Rodes-Cabau J, Bogaty P (2010) Association between timeliness of reperfusion therapy and clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 303(21):2148–2155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Danchin N, Blanchard D, Steg PG, Sauval P, Hanania G, Goldstein P, Cambou JP, Gueret P, Vaur L, Boutalbi Y, Genes N, Lablanche JM (2004) Impact of prehospital thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction on 1-year outcome: results from the French Nationwide USIC 2000 Registry. Circulation 110(14):1909–1915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Kaul S, Diamond GA (2010) Trial and error. How to avoid commonly encountered limitations of published clinical trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(5):415–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stone GW, Pocock SJ (2010) Randomized trials, statistics, and clinical inference. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(5):428–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Nallamothu BK, Bates ER (2003) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: is timing (almost) everything? Am J Cardiol 92(7):824–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. De Luca G, Cassetti E, Marino P (2009) Percutaneous coronary intervention-related time delay, patient’s risk profile, and survival benefits of primary angioplasty vs lytic therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Emerg Med 27(6):712–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Tarantini G, Razzolini R, Napodano M, Bilato C, Ramondo A, Iliceto S (2010) Acceptable reperfusion delay to prefer primary angioplasty over fibrin-specific thrombolytic therapy is affected (mainly) by the patient’s mortality risk: 1 h does not fit all. Eur Heart J 31(6):676–683

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Widimsky P, Wijns W, Fajadet J, de Belder M, Knot J, Aaberge L, Andrikopoulos G, Baz JA, Betriu A, Claeys M, Danchin N, Djambazov S, Erne P, Hartikainen J, Huber K, Kala P, Klinceva M, Kristensen SD, Ludman P, Ferre JM, Merkely B, Milicic D, Morais J, Noc M, Opolski G, Ostojic M, Radovanovic D, De Servi S, Stenestrand U, Studencan M, Tubaro M, Vasiljevic Z, Weidinger F, Witkowski A, Zeymer U (2010) Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction in Europe: description of the current situation in 30 countries. Eur Heart J 31(8):943–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Bongard V, Puel J, Savary D, Belle L, Charpentier S, Cottin Y, Soulat L, Elbaz M, Miljkovic D, Steg PG (2009) Predictors of infarct artery patency after prehospital thrombolysis: the multicentre, prospective, observational OPTIMAL study. Heart 95(10):799–806

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Mandelzweig L, Battler A, Boyko V, Bueno H, Danchin N, Filippatos G, Gitt A, Hasdai D, Hasin Y, Marrugat J, Van de Werf F, Wallentin L, Behar S (2006) The second Euro Heart Survey on acute coronary syndromes: Characteristics, treatment, outcome of patients with ACS in Europe, the Mediterranean Basin in 2004. Eur Heart J 27(19):2285–2293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K, Thuesen L, Kelbaek H, Thayssen P, Abildgaard U, Pedersen F, Madsen JK, Grande P, Villadsen AB, Krusell LR, Haghfelt T, Lomholt P, Husted SE, Vigholt E, Kjaergard HK, Mortensen LS (2003) A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 349(8):733–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Mueller UM EI, Eckrich K et al (2010) Impact of minimising door-to-balloon times in st-elevation myocardial infarction to less than 30 minutes on outcome—an analysis over an 8-year period in a tertiary care centre. Clin Res Cardiol (in press)

  55. van de Loo A, Saurbier B, Kalbhenn J, Koberne F, Zehender M (2006) Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction: direct transportation to catheterization laboratory by emergency teams reduces door-to-balloon time. Clin Cardiol 29(3):112–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bohmer E, Hoffmann P, Abdelnoor M, Arnesen H, Halvorsen S (2010) Efficacy and safety of immediate angioplasty versus ischemia-guided management after thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction in areas with very long transfer distances results of the NORDISTEMI (NORwegian study on DIstrict treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 55(2):102–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Vermeer F, Oude Ophuis AJ, vd Berg EJ, Brunninkhuis LG, Werter CJ, Boehmer AG, Lousberg AH, Dassen WR, Bar FW (1999) Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities: a safety and feasibility study. Heart 82(4):426–431

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Investigators TEftG (1993) An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. The GUSTO investigators. N Engl J Med 329(10):673–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Ellis SG, Tendera M, de Belder MA, van Boven AJ, Widimsky P, Janssens L, Andersen HR, Betriu A, Savonitto S, Adamus J, Peruga JZ, Kosmider M, Katz O, Neunteufl T, Jorgova J, Dorobantu M, Grinfeld L, Armstrong P, Brodie BR, Herrmann HC, Montalescot G, Neumann FJ, Effron MB, Barnathan ES, Topol EJ (2008) Facilitated PCI in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 358(21):2205–2217

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfgang von Scheidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

von Scheidt, W., Thilo, C. As time goes by? The fallacy of thrombolysis in STEMI networks. Clin Res Cardiol 100, 867–877 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-011-0332-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-011-0332-1

Keywords

Navigation