Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The effect of a clinical pathway for enhanced recovery of rectal resections on perioperative quality of care

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

There is ample evidence of the benefits of clinical pathways (CPs), but this study is the first to investigate the potential additional benefits of a CP for rectal resections in a setting with an already established policy of enhanced postoperative recovery.

Methods

We compared 36 patients who underwent rectal resections with ileostomy placement and were treated according to a CP (CP group) with 67 patients treated before CP implementation (prepathway group). Indicators of process quality were placement of central venous line and epidural catheter, day of removal of Foley catheter in relation to removal of the epidural catheter, day of first mobilization, day of resumption of regular diet, day of first passage of stool through the stoma, and length of stay. Outcome quality was assessed by morbidity, mortality, reoperation, and readmission rates.

Results

We found that patients in the CP group resumed regular diet significantly sooner (p = 0.001). There were no significant differences regarding the day of first mobilization (p = 0.69), epidural catheter (p = 0.74), central venous line placement (p = 0.92), and removal of Foley catheter (p = 0.23). The first stool was passed through the stoma earlier (p = 0.04) in the prepathway group. Median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the CP group (12.5 vs. 15.0 days; p = 0.008). There were no significant changes in outcome quality, except for a significantly higher need for revisional surgery in the CP group (13.9 vs. 3 %, p = 0.05).

Conclusions

After implementation of a CP for rectal resections, one parameter of process quality improved and length of stay decreased.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Donabedian A (1988) The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 260(12):1743–1748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roeder N, Hensen P, Hindle D, Loskamp N, Lakomek HJ (2003) Clinical pathways: effective and efficient inpatient treatment. Chirurg 74(12):1149–1155. doi:10.1007/s00104-003-0754-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinsman L, Rotter T, James E, Snow P, Willis J (2010) What is a clinical pathway? Development of a definition to inform the debate. BMC Med 8:31. doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, Machotta A, Gothe H, Willis J, Snow P, Kugler J (2010) Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD006632. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006632.pub2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ronellenfitsch U, Rossner E, Jakob J, Post S, Hohenberger P, Schwarzbach M (2008) Clinical pathways in surgery: should we introduce them into clinical routine? A review article. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 393(4):449–457. doi:10.1007/s00423-008-0303-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kehlet H (2008) Fast-track colorectal surgery. Lancet 371(9615):791–793. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60357-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, Xynos E, Tekkis PP (2009) Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Color Dis 24(10):1119–1131. doi:10.1007/s00384-009-0703-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwenk W (2009) Fast track rehabilitation in visceral surgery. Chirurg 80(8):690–701. doi:10.1007/s00104-009-1676-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J, Nygren J, Lassen K, Andersen J, Kessels AG, Revhaug A, Kehlet H, Ljungqvist O, Fearon KC, von Meyenfeldt MF (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94(2):224–231. doi:10.1002/bjs.5468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Schwarzbach M, Hasenberg T, Linke M, Kienle P, Post S, Ronellenfitsch U (2011) Perioperative quality of care is modulated by process management with clinical pathways for fast-track surgery of the colon. Int J Color Dis 26(12):1567–1575. doi:10.1007/s00384-011-1260-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW (2003) Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46(7):851–859. doi:10.1097/01.DCR.0000075209.09377.00

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Melbert RB, Kimmins MH, Isler JT, Billingham RP, Lawton D, Salvadalena G, Cortezzo M, Rowbotham R (2002) Use of a critical pathway for colon resections. J Gastrointest Surg 6(5):745–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pritts TA, Nussbaum MS, Flesch LV, Fegelman EJ, Parikh AA, Fischer JE (1999) Implementation of a clinical pathway decreases length of stay and cost for bowel resection. Ann Surg 230(5):728–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stephen AE, Berger DL (2003) Shortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colon resection. Surgery 133(3):277–282. doi:10.1067/msy.2003.19S0039606002216256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmiegel W, Pox C, Adler G, Fleig W, Folsch UR, Fruhmorgen P, Graeven U, Hohenberger W, Holstege A, Junginger T, Kuhlbacher T, Porschen R, Propping P, Riemann JF, Sauer R, Sauerbruch T, Schmoll HJ, Zeitz M, Selbmann HK (2004) S3-Guidelines Conference “Colorectal Carcinoma” 2004. Z Gastroenterol 42(10):1129–1177. doi:10.1055/s-2004-813699

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG (1992) CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infec Control Hosp Epidemiol 13(10):606–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu SS, Carpenter RL, Mackey DC, Thirlby RC, Rupp SM, Shine TS, Feinglass NG, Metzger PP, Fulmer JT, Smith SL (1995) Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on rate of recovery after colon surgery. Anesthesiology 83(4):757–765

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Scott AM, Starling JR, Ruscher AE, DeLessio ST, Harms BA (1996) Thoracic versus lumbar epidural anesthesia’s effect on pain control and ileus resolution after restorative proctocolectomy. Surgery 120(4):688–695

    Google Scholar 

  19. Henriksen MG, Jensen MB, Hansen HV, Jespersen TW, Hessov I (2002) Enforced mobilization, early oral feeding, and balanced analgesia improve convalescence after colorectal surgery. Nutrition 18(2):147–152

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jakobsen DH, Sonne E, Andreasen J, Kehlet H (2006) Convalescence after colonic surgery with fast-track vs conventional care. Color Dis 8(8):683–687. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2006.00995.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S (2009) Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 13(3):569–575. doi:10.1007/s11605-008-0592-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou ZG, Hu M, Li Y, Lei WZ, Yu YY, Cheng Z, Li L, Shu Y, Wang TC (2004) Laparoscopic versus open total mesorectal excision with anal sphincter preservation for low rectal cancer. Surg Endosc 18(8):1211–1215. doi:10.1007/s00464-003-9170-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Trastulli S, Cirocchi R, Listorti C, Cavaliere D, Avenia N, Gulla N, Giustozzi G, Sciannameo F, Noya G, Boselli C (2012) Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Color Dis 14(6):e277–e296. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.02985.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Baldini G, Bagry H, Aprikian A, Carli F (2009) Postoperative urinary retention: anesthetic and perioperative considerations. Anesthesiology 110(5):1139–1157. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819f7aea

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Changchien CR, Yeh CY, Huang ST, Hsieh ML, Chen JS, Tang R (2007) Postoperative urinary retention after primary colorectal cancer resection via laparotomy: a prospective study of 2,355 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 50(10):1688–1696. doi:10.1007/s10350-007-0305-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Saint S, Lipsky BA (1999) Preventing catheter-related bacteriuria: should we? Can we? How? Arch Intern Med 159(8):800–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Clarke A (1996) Why are we trying to reduce length of stay? Evaluation of the costs and benefits of reducing time in hospital must start from the objectives that govern change. Qual Health Care 5(3):172–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown C, Hofer T, Johal A, Thomson R, Nicholl J, Franklin BD, Lilford RJ (2008) An epistemology of patient safety research: a framework for study design and interpretation. Part 2. Study design. Qual Saf Health Care 17(3):163–169. doi:10.1136/qshc.2007.023648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250(2):187–196. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. De Allegri M, Schwarzbach M, Loerbroks A, Ronellenfitsch U (2011) Which factors are important for the successful development and implementation of clinical pathways? A qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf 20(3):203–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all involved staff members who participated in the design and implementation of the CP. We thank Miriam Linke and Hannah Weißschuh for assisting in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68135, Mannheim, Germany

    J. Hardt, T. Hasenberg, S. Post, P. Kienle & U. Ronellenfitsch

  2. Department of Surgery, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Gotenstrasse 6-8, 68150, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    M. Schwarzbach

Authors
  1. J. Hardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Schwarzbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. T. Hasenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S. Post
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Kienle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. U. Ronellenfitsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Ronellenfitsch.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 51 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hardt, J., Schwarzbach, M., Hasenberg, T. et al. The effect of a clinical pathway for enhanced recovery of rectal resections on perioperative quality of care. Int J Colorectal Dis 28, 1019–1026 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1650-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-013-1650-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation