Skip to main content
Log in

Pharmacokinetics and penetration of moxifloxacin into infected diabetic foot tissue in a large diabetic patient cohort

  • Pharmacokinetics and Disposition
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Physiological changes occurring in patients with diabetes may affect the pharmacokinetics and penetration of antimicrobial agents into peripheral tissue. We examined the pharmacokinetics and the penetration of moxifloxacin into perinecrotic tissue of diabetic foot lesions in patients with diabetic foot infections (DFI).

Patients and methods

Adult patients suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus and hospitalized for DFI (Texas classification of at least B2) were treated with 400 mg moxifloxacin intravenously (IV) or orally (PO) once daily. The pharmacokinetics of moxifloxacin and its concentration 3 h after administration in samples of perinecrotic tissue resected from infected diabetic foot wounds were determined at steady state (days 4–8).

Results

A total of 53 patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 (mean age 69.4 ± 10.8 years) were included in the study, of whom 28 received PO and 25 IV moxifloxacin therapy for a median of 8 days. In the PO and IV subgroups, the mean maximum observed plasma concentration (C max) in plasma was 2.69 and 4.77 mg/l at a median of 2 [time to reach C max (T max) range 1.0–8.0 h] and 1 h after administration, respectively. A mean area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 until the last quantifiable plasma concentration (AUC0-24 h) of 29.36 mg h/l (PO) and 27.09 mg h/l (IV) was achieved. Mean moxifloxacin concentrations in perinecrotic tissue of infected diabetic foot wounds following PO or IV administration were 1.79 ± 0.82 and 2.20 ± 1.54 μg/g, thus exceeding the MIC90 (minimum inhibitory concentration required to inhibit growth of 90% of organisms) for Staphylococcus aureus (0.25 mg/l) by seven- and eightfold and the MIC90 for Escherichia coli (0.06 mg/l) by 29-fold and 36-fold, respectively. The mean tissue-to-plasma ratios of moxifloxacin concentration 3 h after administration were 1.01 ± 0.57 (PO) and 1.09 ± 0.69 (IV). Significant differences between the routes of administration were observed for T max and C max (P < 0.01), but not for other clinically relevant parameters (AUC0-24; moxifloxacin DFI tissue concentration).

Conclusions

The plasma concentration–time curve of moxifloxacin in diabetic patients is similar to that of healthy volunteers. We also observed a good penetration of moxifloxacin into inflamed DFI tissue which taken together with the possibility of sequential IV/PO therapy suggest that moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily is a therapeutic option in the treatment of DFI caused by susceptible organisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lipsky BA, Berendt AR, Deery HG, Embil JM, Joseph WS, Karchmer AW, LeFrock JL, Lew DP, Mader JT, Norden C, Tan JS (2004) Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic foot infections. Clin Infect Dis 39:885–910. http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/424846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lipsky BA, Giordano P, Choudhri S, Song J (2007) Treating diabetic foot infections with sequential intravenous to oral moxifloxacin compared with piperacillin–tazobactam/amoxicillin–clavulanate. J Antimicrob Chemother 60:370–376. http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/60/2/370?etoc

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stengel D, Graninger W (2005) Antimicrobial treatment of diabetic foot infections. Effects of primary and secondary prevention measures on amputation rates. Chemotherapie J 14:191–197. http://www.wissenschaftliche-verlagsgesellschaft.de/CTJ/CTJ2005/CTJ-6-05/stengel-1.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  4. Oberdorfer K, Swoboda S, Hamann A, Baertsch U, Kusterer K, Born B, Hoppe-Tichy T, Geiss HK, von Baum H (2004) Tissue and serum levofloxacin concentrations in diabetic foot infection patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 54:836–839. http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/54/4/836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Majcher-Peszynska J, Haase G, Saß M, Mundkowski R, Pietsch A, Klammt S, Schareck W, Drewelow B (2008) Pharmacokinetics and penetration of linezolid into inflamed soft tissue in diabetic foot infections. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 64:1093–1100. http://www.springerlink.com/content/703t7j5qr1w41165/

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Edmiston CE, Krepel CJ, Seabrook GR, Somberg LR, Nakeeb A, Cambria RA, Towne JB (2004) In vitro activities of moxifloxacin against 900 aerobic and anaerobic surgical isolates from patients with intra-abdominal and diabetic foot infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:1012–1016. http://aac.asm.org/cgi/content/full/48/3/1012?view=long&pmid=14982797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Joukhadar C, Stass H, Müller-Zellenberg U, Lackner E, Kovar F, Minar E, Müller M (2003) Penetration of moxifloxacin into healthy and inflamed subcutaneous adipose tissues in humans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:3099–3103. http://aac.asm.org/cgi/content/full/47/10/3099?view=long&pmid=14506015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wacke R, Förster S, Adam U, Mundkowski RG, Klar E, Hopt UT, Drewelow B (2006) Penetration of moxifloxacin into the human pancreas following a single intravenous or oral dose. J Antimicrob Chemother 58:994–999. http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/58/5/994

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Citron DM, Goldstein EJC, Merriam CV, Lipsky BA, Abramson MA (2007) Bacteriology of moderate-to-severe diabetic foot infections and in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents. J Clin Microbiol 45:2819–2828. http://jcm.asm.org/cgi/content/full/45/9/2819?view=long&pmid=17609322

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Edmiston CE, Krepel CJ, Kehl KS, Seabrook GR, Somberg LB, Almassi GH, Smith TL, Loehrl TA, Brown KR, Lewis BD, Towne JB (2005) Comparative in vitro antimicrobial activity of a novel quinolone, garenoxacin, against aerobic and anaerobic microbial isolates recovered from general, vascular, cardiothoracic and otolaryngologic surgical patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:872–878. http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/56/5/872

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vick-Fragoso R, Hernández-Oliva G, Cruz-Alcázar J, Amábile-Cuevas CF, Arvis P, Reimnitz P, Bogner JR, The STIC Study Group (2009) Efficacy and safety of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin vs intravenous/oral amoxicillin/clavulanate for complicated skin and skin structure infections. Infection 37(5):407–417. http://www.springerlink.com/content/c622602821776232/

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim A, Suecof LA, Sutherland CA, Gao L, Kuti JL, Nicolau DP (2008) In vivo microdialysis study of the penetration of daptomycin into soft tissues in diabetic versus healthy volunteers. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52(11):3941–3946. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2573116/pdf/0589-08.pdf

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stass H, Kubitza D (1999) Pharmacokinetics and elimination of moxifloxacin after oral and intravenous administration in man. J Antimicrob Chemother 43:83–90. http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/43/suppl_2/83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stass H, Dalhoff A (2005) The integrated use of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models for the definition of breakpoints. Infection 33:29–35. http://www.springerlink.com/content/j651rt2833463465/

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Burkhard O, Welte T (2009) 10 years' experience with the pneumococcal quinolone moxifloxacin. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 7(6):645–668. http://www.expert-reviews.com/doi/abs/10.1586/eri.09.46?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dncbi.nlm.nih.gov

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gyssens IC, Dryden M, Kujath P, Nathwani D, Schaper N, Arvis P, Reimnitz P, Alder J, Hampel B. Efficacy of IV/oral moxifloxacin in the treatment of complicated skin and skin-structure infections: results of the RELIEF study. In: 19th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Helsinki, P1785. http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/eccmid19/abstract.asp?id=75391

  17. Wirtz M, Kleeff J, Swoboda S, Halaceli I, Geiss HK, Hoppe-Tichy T, Büchler MW, Friess H (2004) Moxifloxacin penetration into human gastrointestinal tissues. J Antimicrob Chemother 53(5):875–877. http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/53/5/875

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Soman A, Honeybourne D, Andrews J, Jevons G, Wise R (1999) Concentrations of moxifloxacin in serum and pulmonary compartments following a single 400 mg oral dose in patients undergoing fibre-optic bronchoscopy. J Antimicrob Chemother 44(6):835–838. http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/44/6/835

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schaper N, Dryden M, Kujath P, Nathwani D, Arvis P, Reimnitz P, Alder J, Hampel B, Gyssens IC (2010) Efficacy of IV/PO moxifloxacin and IV piperacillin/tazobactam followed by PO amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of diabetic foot infections: results of the RELIEF study. In: 20th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Vienna, P1550. http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/123359225/PDFSTART

  20. Bergogne-Berezin E (2002) Clinical role of protein binding of quinolones. Clin Pharmacokinet 41(10):741–750. http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/adis/cpk/2002/00000041/00000010/art00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pascual A, García I, Ballesta S, Perea EJ (1999) Uptake and intracellular activity of moxifloxacin in human neutrophils and tissue-cultured epithelial cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43(1):12–15. http://aac.asm.org/cgi/reprint/43/1/12

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors express their thanks for the excellent technical assistance provided by Katrin Kroesche and Andrea Bruss. We thank Klaus A. Schmidt, Aachen, for his assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported in part by an unrestricted grant by Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany.

Conflict of interest statement:

J.M.P. has received speaking fee from Bayer Vital GmbH.

M.S. has no conflict of interest.

S.S. has no conflict.

V.C. has received research support from Bayer Vital GmbH.

A.G. has received research support from Bayer Vital GmbH.

R.L. has received a speaking fee from Bayer Vital GmbH.

R.G.M.has received research grants from Bayer Vital GmbH.

C.L. has no conflict.

P.K. has received a speaking fee from Bayer Vital GmbH.

B.R. has received research grants from Bayer Vital GmbH.

H.H.K. has received a speaking fee from Bayer Vital GmbH.

W.S. has no conflict.

E.K. has received research grants from Bayer Vital GmbH.

B.D. has served as a consultant and received research grants from Bayer Vital GmbH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jolanta Majcher-Peszynska.

Additional information

The results of an interim analysis of this study were presented at the 16th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ECCMID), Nice, France, April 2006; abstract P1516. Available at: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/eccmid16/abstract.asp?id=50311

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Majcher-Peszynska, J., Sass, M., Schipper, S. et al. Pharmacokinetics and penetration of moxifloxacin into infected diabetic foot tissue in a large diabetic patient cohort. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 67, 135–142 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0903-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-010-0903-5

Keywords

Navigation