Abstract
The variety of sometimes contradictory results of studies of the impact of secondary cognitive tasks on postural balance may be attributed to the heterogeneity of balance challenges and tasks deployed and frequent lack of quantitative comparability of tasks. We deployed a wide range of quantitatively graded difficulties of both balance challenge and cognitive tasking to obtain an overview of the spectrum of their interactions in a multi-tasking situation. A differential comparison of the effects of verbally versus spatially loaded tasks, balanced for difficulty, was made and unlike any other study, we contrived to incorporate falls as an experimental variable. In the first study subjects stood in tandem on beams of either 2, 3 and 6 cm or 3, 6 and 8 cm width (according to ‘best performance’ ability) while performing mental verbal or spatial ‘Stroop’ tasks. The design was a between groups (sixteen subjects each) comparison (to reduce learning effect) of sway, fall rate and task error, balanced for order. Measurements were taken of centre of pressure, sway velocity at the hip and head displacement. For any beam width there were no within-subject correlations between sway magnitudes and frequency of falls. Spatial task errors increased with balance challenge (hence with magnitude of sway) but verbal performance was maintained independently of balance challenge. The results of the first study provided statistical power estimates for the design of the second focussed experiment which made a within group (twenty four subjects) comparison of the impact of spatial versus verbal tasks on balancing on the hardest beam. The spatial task significantly elevated the incidence of falls whereas the verbal task had no effect on fall rate. The spatial task raised the incidence of falling by 50% (P = 0.0008) in comparison with ‘no task’. The verbal task had no effect (P = 0.07). We conclude that sway magnitude is a poor index of multi-task load. Multi-tasking can increase the chance of falling and spatial processing may have a specific impact on balance. The significant elevation of fall frequency during cognitive tasking shows that the ‘posture first’ principal can be transgressed although the necessary condition for transgression may be that the subject is willing to take risks believing that he can arrest any fall.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
When evaluating the many studies on multi tasking during postural challenge it should be remembered that one reason for the variable findings is that the ‘no task condition’ is a potential source of noise since the untaxed subject may self generates mental distractions.
References
Adkin AL, Frank JS, Carpenter MG, Peysar GW (2000) Postural control is scaled to level of postural threat. Gait Posture 12:87–93
Andersson G, Yardley L, Luxon L (1998) A dual-task study of interference between mental activity and control of balance. Am J Otol 19:632–637
Andersson G, Hagman J, Talianzadeh R, Svedberg A, Larsen HC (2002) Effect of cognitive load on postural control. Brain Res Bull 58:135–139
Andersson G, Hagman J, Talianzadeh R, Svedberg A, Larsen HC (2003) Dual-task study of cognitive and postural interference in patients with vestibular disorders. Otol Neurotol 24:289–293
Ashburn A, Stack E (2000) Fallers and non-fallers with Parkinson’s disease (PD): the influence of a dual task on standing balance. Mov Disord 15
Bloem BR, Valkenburg VV, Slabbekoorn M, van Dijk JG (2001) The multiple tasks test. Strategies in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res 137:478–486
Bouisset S, Duchene J (1994) Is body balance more perturbed by respiration in seating than in standing posture? Neuroreport 5:957–960
Bourke PA, Duncan J, Nimmo-Smith I (1996) A general factor involved in dual task performance decrement. Q J Exp Psychol 49A:525–545
Brauer SG, Woollacott M, Shumway-Cook A (2001) The interacting effects of cognitive demand and recovery of postural stability in balance-impaired elderly persons. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:489–496
Camicioli R, Howieson D, Lehman S, Kaye J (1997) Talking while walking: the effect of a dual task in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 48:955–958
Carpenter MG, Frank JS, Silcher CP (1999) Surface height effects on postural control: a hypothesis for a stiffness strategy for stance. J Vestib Res 9:277–286
Chen HC, Schultz AB, Ashton-Miller JA, Giordani B, Alexander NB, Guire KE (1996) Stepping over obstacles: dividing attention impairs performance of old more than young adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 51:116–122
Dault MC, Geurts AC, Mulder TW, Duysens J (2001) Postural control and cognitive task performance in healthy participants while balancing on different support-surface configurations. Gait Posture 14:248–255
Ehrenfried T, Guerraz M, Thilo KV, Yardley L, Gresty MA (2003) Posture and mental task performance when viewing a moving visual field. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 17:140–153
Gresty M, Waters S, Bray A, Bunday K, Golding J (2003) Impairment of spatial cognitive function with preservation of verbal performance during spatial disorientation. Curr Biol 13:829–830
Hunter MC, Hoffman MA (2001) Postural control: visual and cognitive manipulations. Gait Posture 13:41–48
Kerr B, Condon SM, McDonald LA (1985) Cognitive spatial processing and the regulation of posture. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 11:617–622
Lajoie Y, Teasdale N, Bard C, Fleury M (1993) Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Exp Brain Res 97:139–144
Lundin-Olsson L, Nyberg L, Gustafson Y (1997) “Stops walking when talking” as a predictor of falls in elderly people. Lancet 349:617
Maki BE, McIlroy WE (1996) Influence of arousal and attention on the control of postural sway. J Vestib Res 6:53–59
Maki BE, Whitelaw RS (1993) Influence of expectation and arousal on center-of-pressure responses to transient postural perturbations. J Vestib Res 3:25–39
Marchese R, Bove M, Abbruzzese G (2003) Effect of cognitive and motor tasks on postural stability in Parkinson’s disease: a posturographic study. Mov Disord 18:652–658
Marsh AP, Geel SE (2000) The effect of age on the attentional demands of postural control. Gait Posture 12:105–113
Maylor EA, Wing AM (1996) Age differences in postural stability are increased by additional cognitive demands. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 51:P143–154
Maylor EA, Allison S, Wing AM (2001) Effects of spatial and nonspatial cognitive activity on postural stability. Br J Psychol 92:319–338
McNevin NH, Wulf G (2002) Attentional focus on supra-postural tasks affects postural control. Hum Mov Sci 21:187–202
Morris M, Iansek R, Smithson F, Huxham F (2000) Postural instability in Parkinson’s disease: a comparison with and without a concurrent task. Gait Posture 12:205–216
Pashler H (1994) Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. Psychol Bull 116:220–244
Pellecchia GL (2003) Postural sway increases with attentional demands of concurrent cognitive task. Gait Posture 18:29–34
Rankin JK, Woollacott MH, Shumway-Cook A, Brown LA (2000) Cognitive influence on postural stability: a neuromuscular analysis in young and older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:112–119
Redfern MS, Jennings JR, Martin C, Furman JM (2001) Attention influences sensory integration for postural control in older adults. Gait Posture 14:211–216
Redfern MS, Talkowski ME, Jennings JR, Furman JM (2004) Cognitive influences in postural control of patients with unilateral vestibular loss. Gait Posture 19:105–114
Riley MA, Baker AA, Schmit JM (2003) Inverse relation between postural variability and difficulty of a concurrent short-term memory task. Brain Res Bull 62:191–195
Riley MA, Baker AA, Schmit JM, Weaver E (2005) Effects of visual and auditory short-term memory tasks on the spatiotemporal dynamics and variability of postural sway. J Mot Behav 37:311–324
Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M, Kerns KA, Baldwin M (1997) The effects of two types of cognitive tasks on postural stability in older adults with and without a history of falls. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 52:232–240
Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott M (2000) Attentional demands and postural control: the effect of sensory context. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:10–16
Simoneau M, Teasdale N, Bourdin C, Bard C, Fleury M, Nougier V (1999) Aging and postural control: postural perturbations caused by changing the visual anchor. J Am Geriatr Soc 47:235–240
Stelmach GE, Zelaznik HN, Lowe D (1990) The influence of aging and attentional demands on recovery from postural instability. Aging (Milano) 2:155–161
Swan L, Otani H, Loubert PV, Sheffert SM, Dunbar GL (2004) Improving balance by performing a secondary cognitive task. Br J Psychol 95:31–40
Teasdale N, Bard C, La Rue J, Fleury M (1993) On the cognitive penetrability of posture control. Exp Aging Res 19:1–13
Vuillerme N, Nafati G (2005) How attentional focus on body sway affects postural control during quiet standing. Psychol Res:1–9
Vuillerme N, Nougier V, Teasdale N (2000) Effects of a reaction time task on postural control in humans. Neurosci Lett 291:77–80
Winter DA, Patla AE, Prince F, Ishac M, Gielo-Perczak K (1998) Stiffness control of balance in quiet standing. J Neurophysiol 80:1211–1221
Yardley L, Gardner M, Leadbetter A, Lavie N (1999) Effect of articulatory and mental tasks on postural control. Neuroreport 10:215–219
Yardley L, Gardner M, Bronstein A, Davies R, Buckwell D, Luxon L (2001) Interference between postural control and mental task performance in patients with vestibular disorder and healthy controls. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 71:48–52
Acknowledgments
This project was supported by the Medical Research Council of Great Britain award no GO300407. The Stroop tests used in the experiments were developed in collaboration with Prof. Lucy Yardley, University of Southampton, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barra, J., Bray, A., Sahni, V. et al. Increasing cognitive load with increasing balance challenge: recipe for catastrophe. Exp Brain Res 174, 734–745 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0519-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0519-2