Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predictors of very low adherence with medications for osteoporosis: towards development of a clinical prediction rule

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

We developed a clinical prediction rule score to predict medication non-adherence for women prescribed osteoporosis treatment. When combined into a summative score, 62% with seven or more points on the score demonstrated very low adherence. This compares with 17% subjects with fewer than seven points (c-statistic = 0.74).

Introduction

Medication non-adherence is extremely common for osteoporosis; however, no clear methods exist for identifying patients at risk of this behavior. We developed a clinical prediction rule to predict medication non-adherence for women prescribed osteoporosis treatment.

Methods

Women undergoing bone mineral density testing and fulfilling WHO criteria for osteoporosis were invited to complete a questionnaire and then followed for 1 year. Adjusted logistic regression models were examined to identify variables associated with very low adherence (medication possession ratio <20%). The weighted variables, based on the logistic regression, were summed, and the score was compared with the proportion of subjects with very low adherence.

Results

One hundred forty two women participated in the questionnaire and were prescribed an osteoporosis medication. After 1 year, 36% (n = 50) had very low adherence. Variables associated with very low adherence included prior non-adherence with chronic medications, agreement that side effects are concerning, agreement that she is taking too many medications, lack of agreement that osteoporosis is a worry, lack of agreement that a fracture will cause disability, lack of agreement that medications help her stay active, and frequent use of alcohol. When combined into a summative score, 36 of the 58 subjects (62%) with seven or more points on the score demonstrated very low adherence. This compares with 14 of the 84 (17%) subjects with fewer than seven points (c-statistic = 0.74).

Conclusion

We developed a brief clinical prediction rule that was able to discriminate between women likely (and unlikely) to experience very low adherence with osteoporosis medications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB (2003) Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc 51(3):364–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Melton LJ 3rd (2003) Adverse outcomes of osteoporotic fractures in the general population. J Bone Miner Res 18(6):1139–1141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Milch VE, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Center JR (2009) Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. JAMA 301(5):513–521

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH, Wong JB, King A, Tosteson A (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005–2025. J Bone Miner Res 22(3):465–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cranney A, Guyatt G, Griffith L, Wells G, Tugwell P, Rosen C (2002) Osteoporosis methodology group and the osteoporosis research advisory G. Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. IX: summary of meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 23(4):570–578

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Solomon DH, Finkelstein JS, Katz JN, Mogun H, Avorn J (2003) Underuse of osteoporosis medications in elderly patients with fractures. Am J Med 115(5):398–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Solomon DH, Morris C, Cheng H, Cabral D, Katz JN, Finkelstein JS, Avorn J (2005) Medication use patterns for osteoporosis: an assessment of guidelines, treatment rates, and quality improvement interventions. Mayo Clin Proc 80(2):194–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Solomon DH, Avorn J, Katz JN, Finkelstein JS, Arnold M, Polinski JM, Brookhart MA (2005) Compliance with osteoporosis medications. Arch Intern Med 165(20):2414–2419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kothawala P, Badamgarav E, Ryu S, Miller RM, Halbert RJ (2007) Systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world adherence to drug therapy for osteoporosis. Mayo Clin Proc 82(12):1493–1501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cramer JA, Gold DT, Silverman SL, Lewiecki EM (2007) A systematic review of persistence and compliance with bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 18(8):1023–1031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rabenda V, Hiligsmann M, Reginster JY (2009) Poor adherence to oral bisphosphonate treatment and its consequences: a review of the evidence. Expert Opin Pharmacother 10(14):2303–2315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Haynes RB, Ackloo E, Sahota N, McDonald HP, Yao X (2008) Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD000011

  13. Gleeson T, Iversen MD, Avorn J, Brookhart AM, Katz JN, Losina E, May F, Patrick AR, Shrank WH, Solomon DH (2009) Interventions to improve adherence and persistence with osteoporosis medications: a systematic literature review. Osteoporos Int 20(12):2127–2134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cook PF, Emiliozzi S, McCabe MM (2007) Telephone counseling to improve osteoporosis treatment adherence: an effectiveness study in community practice settings. Am J Med Qual 22(6):445–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Clowes JA, Peel NF, Eastell R (2004) The impact of monitoring on adherence and persistence with antiresorptive treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(3):1117–1123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Choudhry NK, Shrank WH, Levin RL, Lee JL, Jan SA, Brookhart MA, Solomon DH (2009) Measuring concurrent adherence to multiple related medications. Am J Manage Care 15(7):457–464

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yood RA, Mazor KM, Andrade SE, Emani S, Chan W, Kahler KH (2008) Patient decision to initiate therapy for osteoporosis: the influence of knowledge and beliefs. J Gen Intern Med 23(11):1815–1821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45(6):613–619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was supported by a grant to Fallon Clinic from Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Dr. Solomon receives salary support from Amgen for work on rheumatoid arthritis as well as support from the Arthritis Foundation, AHRQ, and the NIH (AR 055989, AR 047782) on osteoporosis and adherence. Dr. Brookhart is supported by a career development award from the National Institute on Aging (AG27400). He has received grant support from Amgen for unrelated projects and has served on scientific advisory boards for Amgen without receiving compensation.

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Robert Yood has received funding by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation for clinical research, and he is a subinvestigator for a pharmaceutical drug trial funded by Merk.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. H. Solomon.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 77 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Logistic regression for <20% and <80%, odds ratios (95% CI) (DOC 31 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Solomon, D.H., Brookhart, M.A., Tsao, P. et al. Predictors of very low adherence with medications for osteoporosis: towards development of a clinical prediction rule. Osteoporos Int 22, 1737–1743 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1381-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1381-4

Keywords

Navigation